Skip to main content

Species differences and population structure in population viability analysis

  • Chapter
Creative Conservation

Abstract

As the number of threatened species increases, and as we understand more about the extent of the problem, the need for effective and efficient means of identifying endangered species and populations becomes more pressing. However, recognizing that a species has a problem is only a first step — a second crucial stage is to be able to assess accurately the situation and to devise an appropriate management plan to aid recovery. Population viability analysis (PVA) is the methodology invoked to address these problems, and can be used in a variety of contexts (e.g. see Gilpin and Soulé, 1986). In this paper we show how different kinds of analysis are appropriate at different stages of devising a conservation management plan, and for different kinds of problem. If PVA is really to play a valuable role in the recovery of many species, close attention must be paid to the assumptions underlying different methods and to the biology of the species being considered (Caro and Durant, in press).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beudels, R., Durant, S.M. and Harwood, J. (1992) Assessing the risks of extinction for local populations of roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus). Biological Conservation, 61, 107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T.M. and Durant, S.M. (in press) The importance of behavioural ecology for conservation biology: examples from studies of Serengeti carnivores, in Serengeti II: Research, Management and Conservation of an Ecosystem (eds A.R.E. Sinclair and P. Arcese), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A.P., Mace, G.M., Poole, J. and Brett, R.A. (1992) Conservation biology: the ecology and genetics of endangered species, in Genes in Ecology (eds R.J. Berry, T.J. Crawford and G.M. Hewitt), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 405–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, S.M. (1991) Individual variation and dynamics of small populations: implications for conservation and management. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, S.M. and Harwood, J. (1992) Assessment of monitoring and management strategies for local populations of Monachus monachus, the Mediterranean monk seal. Biological Conservation, 61, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, S.M. and Harwood, J. (in press) The effects of social organisation on the genetics and extinction dynamics of small populations of Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) and mountain gorilla (Gorilla gorilla berengei). Conservation Biology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, S.M., Harwood, J. and Beudels, R. (1992) Monitoring and management strategies for endangered populations of marine mammals and ungulates, in Wildlife 2001 (eds D.R. McCullough and R.H. Barrett), Elsevier Applied Science, New York, pp. 252–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, I.R. (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations, in Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary—Ecological Perspective (eds M.E. Soulé and B.A. Wilcox), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, pp. 135–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerodette, T. and Gilmartin, W.G. (1990) Demographic consequences of changed pupping and hauling sites of the Hawaiian monk seal. Conservation Biology, 4(4), 423–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M.E. and Soulé, M.E. (1986) Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinctions, in Conservation Biology — the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. M.E. Soulé), Sinauer Associates, Michigan pp. 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. (1987) The demography of chance extinction, in Viable Populations for Conservation (ed. M.E. Soulé), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK., pp. 11–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C.R. and Clark, T.W. (1986) Determining minimum population size for recovery of the Black-footed ferret. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 8, 150–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A.H., Fossey, D. and Sabater-Pi, J. (1981) Demography of Gorilla gorilla. Journal of Zoology, London, 195, 215–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.B. and Allendorf, F.W. (1989) Genetically effective population size of large mammals: an assessment of estimators. Conservation Biology, 3(2), 181–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, S.C.T. (1974) The social organisation of the roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus) and its influence on the spatial distribution of herds in the Kruger National Park, in The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management (eds V. Geist and F. Walther), IUCN, Morges pp. 661–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science, 241, 1455–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. and Orzack, S.H. (1988) Extinction dynamics of age-structured populations in a fluctuating environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 85, 7418–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, G.M. (1988) The genetic and demographic status of the western lowland gorilla (Gorilla g. gorilla) in captivity. Journal of Zoology, London, 216, 629–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, G.M. and Lande, R. (1991) Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology, 5(2), 148–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchessaux, D. (1989) The biology, status and conservation of the monk seal (Monachus monachus). Report to the Council of Europe. Nature and Environment series No. 41, Palais de l’Europe, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S.L., Jones, H.L. and Diamond, J.M. (1988) On the risk of extinction. American Naturalist, 132, 757–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls, K., Ballou, J.D. and Templeton, A. (1988) Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conservation Biology, 2, 185–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J.M., Doerr, P.D. and Walters, J.R. (1988) Minimum viable population size of the red-cockaded woodpecker. Journal of Wildlife Management, 52(3), 385–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders, P.J.H. and Ries, E.H. (1989) Release and radio-tracking of two rehabilitated monk seals in the marine park ‘Northern Sporades’, Greece, Research Institute for Nature Management, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, G.B. (1963) The Mountain Gorilla, Ecology and Behaviour, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M.L. (1981) Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience, 31, 131–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M.L. (1983) Determining minimum viable population sizes for the grizzly bear. International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 5, 133–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. (1980) Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential, in Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, (eds M.E. Soulé and B.A. Wilcox), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass pp. 151–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. and Mills, L.S. (1992) Conservation genetics and conservation biology: a troubled marriage, in Conservation of Biodiversity for Sustainable Development (eds O.T. Sandlund, K. Hindar and A.H.D. Brown), Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp. 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G.G. (1991) Determining minimum viable populations under the Endangered Species Act. NOAA Technical Memorandum, F/NWC-198, US Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A.W. and Vedder, A. (1983) Population dynamics of the Virunga gorillas: 1959–1978. Biological Conservation, 26, 341–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durant, S.M., Mace, G.M. (1994). Species differences and population structure in population viability analysis. In: Olney, P.J.S., Mace, G.M., Feistner, A.T.C. (eds) Creative Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0721-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0721-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4311-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0721-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics