Skip to main content

Valuing the Benefits of Reducing the Risk of Non-Fatal Road Injuries: The Swedish Experience

  • Chapter
Contingent Valuation, Transport Safety and the Value of Life

Part of the book series: Studies in Risk and Uncertainty ((SIRU,volume 7))

Abstract

The Swedish National Road Administration’s (NRA’S) method for evaluating traffic safety effects of new roads and alternative safety improvements implies that an average casualty is set a certain cost or value. This average cost per casualty is divided into material costs and “human value”. The material costs consist of health-care costs, net lost production, costs of property damage and administration. The human value (including a value of lost consumption due to premature death) corresponds to the willingness to pay approach. This definition is considered to be theoretically consistent with the principles of cost-benefit analysis and comparable with methodology used in other European countries, e.g. in Great Britain (O’Reilly et al. 1994), see also a recent report published by the Commission of the European Communities (COST-313 1994).

The research in this study has been supported by grants from the Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board, the Swedish National Road Administration and the Swedish National Rail Administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow K.J., Solow R.M., Portney P.R., Learner E.E., Radner R. and Schuman H. (1993), ‘Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation’, Federal Register, Vol. 58, pp. 4602–4614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntman M. (1994), Metoder för insamling av uppgifter om svårt trafikskadade-några källor och tekniker, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedervall M. and Persson U. (1988), Vägtrafikolyckornas personskadekostnader. En samhällsekonomisk beräkning av 1985 års personskadekostnader totalt och fördelat på åidersgrupper, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings R.G., Brookshire D.S. and Schultze W.D. (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Rowman and Allanheld, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • COST 313-European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (1994), Socio-economic Cost of Road Accidents, Final Report, EUR 15464, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee M.W. (1974), ‘The Value of Changes in the Probability of Death or Injury’, Journal of Political Economics, Vol. 82, pp. 835–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee M.W. (1989), The Economics of Safety and Physical Risk, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee M.W., Loomes G., O’Reilly D. and Philips P.R. (1993), The Value of Preventing Non-fatal Road Injuries: Findings of a Willingness-to-pay National Sample Survey, Transport Research Laboratory, Contractor Report No. 330, Crowthorne, Berkshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRA-The Swedish National Road Administration (1992), Supplement till Effektkatalog: Kollektivtraflkinvesteringar, 1992:006, Borlänge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly D., Hopkin J., Loomes G., Jones-Lee M.J., Philips P.R., McMahon K., Ives D., Soby B., Ball D. and Kemp R. (1994), ‘The Value of Road Safety: UK Reasearch on the Valuation of Preventing Non-fatal Injuries’, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 28, pp. 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson U. (1992), Three Economic Approaches to Valuing Benefits of Traffic Safety Measures, The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson U. and Cedervall M. (1991), The Value of Risk Reduction: Results of a Swedish Sample Survey, The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, IHE Working Paper 1991: 6, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson U. and Svensson M. (1991), Revidering av Vägverkets materiella olyckskostnader-en indexuppräkning till 1993 års priser, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCB Statistics Sweden, Statistiska Meddelanden (1993), Inkornstfördelningsundersökningen 1991, Be 21 SM 9301, Örebro.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Persson, U., Lugnér Norinder, A., Svensson, M. (1995). Valuing the Benefits of Reducing the Risk of Non-Fatal Road Injuries: The Swedish Experience. In: Schwab Christe, N.G., Soguel, N.C. (eds) Contingent Valuation, Transport Safety and the Value of Life. Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0665-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0665-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4291-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0665-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics