Skip to main content

Federal Reserve Lending to Banks that Failed: Implications for the Bank Insurance Fund

  • Chapter
The Causes and Costs of Depository Institution Failures

Part of the book series: Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions ((IFMI,volume 9))

Abstract

Debate that led to passage of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) in 1991 focused on changes in public policy to reduce losses of the deposit insurance funds. One aspect of public policy subject to such scrutiny was lending by the Federal Reserve to troubled banks. Analysis prepared by Congressional staff indicated that over 300 of the banks that failed in 1985–91 were borrowing from the Fed when they failed, and that 90 percent of the banks that borrowed for extended periods of time eventually failed.1 Other evidence caused the authors of that Congressional staff study to conclude that Fed credit extended the life of borrowers that ultimately failed. Critics of Fed lending practices concluded on the basis of this evidence that lending to troubled banks increased losses to the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF).2 This concern led to constraints on Federal Reserve lending to troubled banks in FDICIA (see the next section below).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Garsson, Robert M. 1991. “Gonzalez Says Fed Actions Fueled the Bank Fund’s Losses.” American Banker, June 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. Alton 1991. “Supervision of Undercapitalized Banks: Is There a Case for Change?” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (May/June): 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. Alton 1992. “The Effects of Legislating Prompt Corrective Action on the Bank Insurance Fund.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (July/August): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. Alton 1993-“Implications of Annual Examinations for the Bank Insurance Fund.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (January/February): 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, Barbara A. 1991. “Lawmakers Attack Fed Lending: Discount Window Called Costly Prop for Shaky Banks.” American Banker, May 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Anna J. 1992. “The Misuse of the Fed’s Discount Window.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (September/ October): 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobin, Paul 1991. “Out the Window.” National Journal (June 22): 1557–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Walker F. 1988. “Lessons of the Past and Prospects for the Future in Lender of Last Resort Theory.” Proceedings of a Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (May 11-13): 533–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Walker F. 1991-“Banks are Not Special: the Federal Safety Net and Banking Powers.” In Catherine England, ed., Governing Banking’s Future: Markets vs. Regulation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Walker F. 1992. “FDICIA’s Discount Window Provisions.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Commentary (December 15).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs 1991a. The Failure of the Bank of New England Corporation and Its Affiliate Banks. Hearing, 102 Cong. 1 Sess. (Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. House of Representatives, 1991b. Failure of Madison National Bank (Hearing). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. House of Representatives, 1991C. “An Analysis of Federal Reserve Discount Window Loans to Failed Institutions.” 102 Cong. 1 Sess. (June 11).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilbert, R.A. (1995). Federal Reserve Lending to Banks that Failed: Implications for the Bank Insurance Fund. In: Cottrell, A.F., Lawlor, M.S., Wood, J.H. (eds) The Causes and Costs of Depository Institution Failures. Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0663-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0663-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4290-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0663-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics