Skip to main content

Causation and Explanation in Econometrics

  • Chapter
On the Reliability of Economic Models

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 42))

Abstract

Econometric and causal modeling techniques are widely used to test causal claims both within economics and in many other areas of social sciences. My aim in this essay will be to suggest, in a rough and preliminary way, one perspective on how we should understand and evaluate these techniques. Section 2.1 reviews, very quickly, the basic apparatus of linear models. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 then discuss the idea that I take to be the key to the causal interpretability of such models—the idea of a structural or autonomous relationship. I attempt to locate this idea within a more general philosophical framework and to defend the conception of causation and explanation it embodies against various challenges. Sections 2.4 and 2.5 then explore the status of the various sorts of causal assumptions that serve as inputs to econometric techniques—assumptions about which variables to include, about causal ordering, and about the distribution of the error term. I discuss what sort of causal knowledge such input claims represent and how we can assess such claims. Section 2.6 explores similar questions concerning the output of econometric techniques—the structural models themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achen, C. (1982). Interpreting and Using Regression. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Alderich, J. (1989). “Autonomy.” In N. de Marchi and C. Gilbert (eds.), History and Methodology of Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderich, J. (1989). “Autonomy.” In N. de Marchi and C. Gilbert (eds.), History and Methodology of Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntzenius, F. (1990). “Physics and Common Causes.” Synthese 82, 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, H. (1983). Causal Modeling. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. (1991). “Toward a Methodology for Mere Mortals.” Sociological Methoodology, 315–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. (1964). Causal Inference in Non-Experimental Research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. (1991). “Are There Really Constructive Alternatives to Causal Modeling?” Sociological Methodology, 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, J. and Blau, P. (1982). “The Cost of Inequality: Metropolitan Structure and Violent Crime.” American Sociological Review 47, 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1991). “Replicability, Reproducibility and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins.” History of Political Economy 23, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J., and T. Moe. (1990). Politics, Markets and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1983). “Some Cautions Concerning the Application of Causal Modeling Methods.” Multivariate Behavioral Rsearch 18, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, T., and S. LeRoy. (1985). “Atheoretical Macroeconomics: A Critique.” Journal of Monetary Economics 16, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield et al. (1959). “Smoking and Lung Cancer: Recent Evidence and a Discussion of some Questions.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22, 173–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, J., M. Milgate, and P. Newman. (1990). Econometrics. New York: Norton. First published in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., D. R., Hendry, and F. J-F. Richard. (1983). “Exogeneity.” Econometrica 51, 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (1984). Linear Statistical Models and Related Methods. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, P. (1991). “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather.” Sociological Methodology, 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1938). “Statistical Versus Theoretical Relations in Economic Macrodynamics.” Mimeo dated July 1938. In R. Frisch (ed.), (1948), Autonomy of Economic Relations, collection of mimeo articles issued by the University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasking, D. (1955). “Causation and Recipes.” Mind 64, 474–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C., R. Scheines, P. Spirtes, and K. Kelly. (1987). Discovering Causal Structure. Orando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37, 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1988). “Causality Testing in a Decision Science.” In B. Skyrms and W. Harper (eds.), Causation, Chance and Credence, Vol. I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J (1990). “Causal Inference.” In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds.), Econometrics (from The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo, T. (1944). “The Probability Approach in Econometrics.” Econometrica 12 (Supplement).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E., and J. Jackson. (1977). Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. (1985). “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Program Statistics Research Report No. 85–63 Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K. (1988). The New Classical Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K (1990). “The Logic of Causal Inference: Econometrics and the Conditional Analysis of Causation.” Economics and Philosophy 6, 201–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K (1991). “The Causal Direction Between Money and Prices.” Journal of Mon-etary Economics 27, 381–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (1989). The Chances of Explanation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., and D. Kinder. (1987). News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1992). Rethinking Social Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1992). “Econometrics: Retrospect and Prospect.” In J. Hey (ed.), The Future of Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1973). Collected Works (vol. 14). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. (1947). “Measurement Without Theory.” Review of Economics and Statistics 31, 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learner, E. (1983). “Let’s Take the Con out of Econometrics.” American Economic Review 79, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1985). Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1976). “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” In K. Brunner and A. Meltzer (eds.), Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy supplementary series to the Journal of Monetary Economics (vol. 1). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, A. (1977). “The Immutable Laws of Nature” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1976–7. London: Compton Press, 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. C. (1965). “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2, 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. M. (1991). “Friedman is Right as Far as He Goes But There is More. It’s Worse. Statisticians Could Help.” Sociological Methodology 21, 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. (1980). “Economics as Hard Science: Realistic Goal or Wishful Thinking?” Economic Inquiry 18, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, P., and T. Bos. (1985). Stochastic Parameter Regression Models. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R., and H. Weisberg. (1984). “What Determines Vote.” In R. Niemi and H. Weisberg (eds.), Controversies in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, B., and C. Jones. (1979). “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote.” American Political Science Review 73, 1071–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1989). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Koufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (1981). “Probability, Explanation and Information.” Synthese 48, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1949). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T. (1976). “The Observational Equivalence of Natural and Unnatural Rate Theories of Macroeconomics.” Journal of Political Economy 84, 631–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheires, R. (1987). Causal Models in Social Science. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1980). “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica 48, 1–49. Skyrms, B. (1980). Causal Necessity. New Haven: Yale University Press. Sober, E. (1988). “Apportioning Causal Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 85(6), 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, F. (1985). “Income-Maintenance Policy and Work Effort: Learning From Experiments and Labor-Market Studies.” In J. Hausman and D. Wise (eds.), Social Experimentation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1970). A Probablistic Theory of Causality. Amsterdam: North Holland. Tinbergen, J. (1939). A Method and Its Applications to Investment Activity. Geneva: League of Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, E. (1975). The Manchester Union-Leader in New Hampshire Elections. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, R. (1949). “Koopmans on the Choice of Variables.” Review of Economics and Statistics 31, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Weisberg, Controversies in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1979). “Scientific Explanation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1984). “A Theory of Singular Causal Explanation.” Erkenntnis 21, 231–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1992). “Realism About Laws.” Erkenntnis 36, 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reprinted in D. Ruber, ed. (1993). Explanation (Oxford Readings in Philosophy). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1993a). “Capacities and Invariance.” In J. Earman, A. Janis, G. Massey, and N. Rescher (eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essay Concerning the Philosophy of Adolph Grünbaum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 283–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1994). “Review Essay of Humphreys’ The Chances of Explanation.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (Forthcoming a). A Theory of Explanation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (forthcoming b). “Causal Modeling, Probabilities and Invariance.” To appear in the proceedings of a conference entitled “Causality in Crisis? The New Debate About Causal Structures in the Social Sciences” held at Notre Daine University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, Hans. (1982). “Disagreement Over the Evaluation of a Controlled Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 88, 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenner, A. (1984). Basic Issues in Econometrics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodward, J. (1995). Causation and Explanation in Econometrics. In: Little, D. (eds) On the Reliability of Economic Models. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0643-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0643-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4280-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0643-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics