Skip to main content

The Two Traditions of Institutional Designing: Dialogue Versus Decision?

  • Chapter
Institutional Design

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 43))

Abstract

Practitioners of the arts of government, as well as their observers, have somewhat ambivalent views concerning the design of institutions within the public sector. On the one hand there is the “tireless tinkering” with institutions, ranging from the reform of a single institution or organization all the way to fundamental constitutional redesign. In practice, it appears that many people believe that structural reform is a worthy enterprise, given the amount of time and energy devoted to it. On the other hand, there is often profound skepticism about the real efficacy of conscious attempts at change. This skepticism is based in part on beliefs that institutions are highly resistant to change so that efforts at purposive transformation are likely to be thwarted by structural inertia. The skepticism may also be based on the belief that human capacities at understanding social structures and processes are sufficiently limited that attempts at imposing reforms may produce institutional outcomes worse than the problems they were intended to solve. In this view the best way to generate institutional change is to let it occur as an evolutionary process rather than imposing externally derived templates

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arblaster, Anthony. (1984). The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism. New York: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin. (1984). Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. and David Bloor. (1982). “Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge.” In M. Hollis and S. Lukes, (eds.), Rationality and Relativism (pp. 21–47). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, Henry F. (1990). Seabrook Station: Citizen Politics and Nuclear Power. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert, Richard Massen, William Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven Tipton. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert, et al. (1991). The Good Society . Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

    Google Scholar 

  • ai]Bernstein, Richard ——. (1988). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Casey. (1990). Beloved Community. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, Davis and John Dryzek. (1989). Policy Analysis by Design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Joseph and David Miller. (1991). “Elster on Self-Realization in Politics: A Critical Note.” Ethics 102(1): 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. (1991). “Introduction.” In Walter Powell and Paul DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman. (1990). “Reading Rational Choice Theory.” Rationality and Society 2(2): 172–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John. (1987). “Discursive Designs: Critical Theory and Political Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 31(3): 656–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John ——. (1990). Discursive Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, Brian. (1987). Critical Social Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, John (ed.). (1985). Critical Theory and Public Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. (1989). Unruly Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, John. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, John ——. (1991). Empowerment. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, Mary Ann. (1991). Rights Talk. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Raymond L. and John K. Schoor. (1991). Demanding Democracy after Three Mile Island. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, William T. (1989). Taming the Bureaucracy: Muscles, Prayers and Other Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafstein, Robert. (1991). Institutional Realism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. (1986). Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, Joel. (1986). “Dependent People, the State, and the Modern/Postmodern Search for the Dialogic Community.” UCLA Law Review 35(6): 999–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1990). Law and the Search for Community. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Christine. (1988). “Regulatory Reform: Creating Gaps and Creating Markets.” Law and Policy 10(2): 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, Karen and Charles Walcott. (1990). Governing Public Organizations: Politics, Structure, and Institutional Design. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenberg, James. (1986). Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870-1920. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will. (1989). Liberalism, Community, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, Christopher. (1988). “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.” In Charles Reynolds and Ralph Norman (eds.), Community in America (pp. 173–184). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen and B. Guy Peters. (1991). “The Logic of Public Policy Design: Linking Policy Actors and Plausible Instruments.” Knowledge and Policy 4(1&2): 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen and B. Guy Peters ——. (1992). “A Metatheoretic Analysis of Policy Design.” In William N. Dunn and Rita Mae Kelly (eds.), Advances in the Policy Sciences Since 1950 (pp. 201–237). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclntyre, Alisdair. (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. and Johan P. Oslen. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George and Michael M.J. Fischer. (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, Stephen and Adam Swift. (1992). Liberals and Communitarians. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert. (1986). Conservatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. (1990). Managing the Commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, Pauline V. (1992). Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael. (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York: Cam-bridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip. (1992). The Moral Commonwealth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalin, Dmitri. (1992). “Critical Theory and the Pragmatist Challenge.” American Journal of Sociology 98(2): 237–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, Günther (ed.). (1986). Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Burg, Wibren. (1990). “Jürgen Habermas on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments.” Theory, Culture and Society 7(4): 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, Cornel. (1987). The American Evasion of Philosophy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, Robert. (1991). John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Linder, S.H., Peters, B.G. (1995). The Two Traditions of Institutional Designing: Dialogue Versus Decision?. In: Institutional Design. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0641-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0641-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4279-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0641-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics