Skip to main content

Detection of Liver Lesions: CT-Arterial Portogrophy vs Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI

  • Chapter
  • 64 Accesses

Part of the book series: Series in Radiology ((SERA,volume 25))

Abstract

My first experiences with computed angioportography or computed angio-tomography (CTA or CTAP) of the liver began about sixteen years ago at M.D. Anderson. At the time of its introduction it was a technique that was viewed with a degree of scepticism by clinicians and it has taken a considerable time for it to become more widely accepted, both in the USA and worldwide. Even now, although it is being used much more prior to surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colon carcinoma, it is still a highly invasive technique. It is not suitable for use in all cases and so the techniques does have restrictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Small WC, Chezmar JL, Bernadino ME. CT angiography and CT arterial portography in evaluation of hepatic adenomas. JCAT 1994;18:266–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson RC, Thompson GH, Chezmar, JL, Harned RKI, Fernandez MP. CT during arterial portography: diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 1992;12:705–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson RC. Techniques for computed tomography of the liver. Radiol Clin N Am 1991;29:1199–212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tyrell RT, Kaufman SL, Bernadino ME. Straight line sign: appearance and significance during CT portography. Radiology. 1989;173:635–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Bernadino ME. Hepatic tumours: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology. 1989;172:27–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heiken JP, Weyman PJ, Lee JK, Balfe DM, Picus D, Brunt EM, Flye MW. Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography and MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171:47–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Murray DR, Bernadino ME. Preoperative localization of focal liver lesions to specific liver segments: utility of CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1990;176: 89–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernardino, M.E. (1995). Detection of Liver Lesions: CT-Arterial Portogrophy vs Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI. In: Balzer, T., Hamm, B., Niendorf, HP. (eds) Contrast Agents in Liver Imaging. Series in Radiology, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0477-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0477-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4213-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0477-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics