Abstract
The radiological evaluation of the liver using computed tomography (CT) has progressively evolved since its introduction in the early 1970s. This has been particularly true during the last decade. Numerous CT techniques have been described and are constantly being modified as the technology evolves. The ultimate goal is to attain the highest sensitivity and specificity for focal and diffuse liver disease using CT. This has become even more important with the advent of MR imaging as a competing modality for liver imaging.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology. 1990; 176:181–3.
Burgener FA, Hamlin DJ. Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT: Comparison between bolus and infusion techniques. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140:291–5.
Burgener FA, Hamlin DJ. Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT: Bolus versus infusion. Am J Roentgenol. 1981; 137:617–22.
Cox IH, Foley WD, Hoffmann RG. Right window for dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology. 1991:181:18–21.
Marchai GJ, Baert AL, Wilms GE. CT of noncystic liver lesions: Bolus-enhancement. Am J Roentgenol. 1980; 135:57–65.
Young SW, Turner RJ, Castellino RA. A strategy for the contrast enhancement of malignant tumors using dynamic computed tomography and intravascular pharmacokinetics. Radiology. 1980;137:137–47.
Berland LL, Lee JY. Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremental computer tomography. Invest Radiol. 1988;23:918–22.
Dean PB, Violante MR, Mahoney BS. Hepatic CT contrast enhancement: Effect of dose, duration of infusion, and time elapsed following infusion. Invest Radiol. 1980;15:158–61.
Brink JA, Heiken JP, Balfe DM, Sagel SS, DiCroce J, Vannier MW. Spiral CT: decreased spatial resolution in vivo due to broadening of section-sensitivity profile. Radiology. 1992; 185:469–74.
Urban BA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, Kawashima A, Hennessey JG, Siegelman SS. Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: Comparison of 4-and 8-mm inter-scan spacing. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:783–5.
Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchai G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology. 1992;185:29–35.
Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, Davros WJ, Carter LM, Griego D, Weltman DI, Ascher SM, Cooper CJ. Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen. Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160:719–25.
Kalender WA, Polacin A. Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. Med Phys. 1991;18:910–5.
Zwicker C, Larger MF, Langer R, Rosenkranz K, Keske U. Spiral CT of hypervascular liver tumors and liver transplants. Radiology. 1991;181(P):95.
Bluemke DA, Fishman EK. Spiral CT arterial portography of the liver. Radiology. 1993;186:576–9.
Polger M, Seltzer SE, Adams DF, Silverman SG. Impact of intravenous contrast agent dose reduction in spiral CT of the liver. Radiology. 1992; 185(P): 110.
Polger M, Seltzer SE, Adams DF, Silverman SG, Savci G. Spiral CT of the liver: potential for improved hepatic enhancement. Acad Radiol. 1994; in press.
Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Forman HP, DiCroce J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: Comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Radiology. 1993; 187:327–31.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sica, G.T., Polger, M. (1995). Spiral CT of the Liver. In: Balzer, T., Hamm, B., Niendorf, HP. (eds) Contrast Agents in Liver Imaging. Series in Radiology, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0477-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0477-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4213-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0477-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive