Abstract
In his autobiography, physicist Otto R. Frisch tells the following revealing anecdote about Niels Bohr. Bohr, we are told, “never trusted a purely formal or mathematical argument. ‘No, no’ he would say ‘You are not thinking; you are just being logical”’ (Frisch, 1979, p. 95).1 It would be arbitrary and uncharitable to interpret Bohr’s point as implying that being logical is not a form of thinking. Rather it seems obvious that he is distinguishing between two types of thinking, logical thinking and another kind which may be appropriately labeled critical thinking. By logical thinking here Bohr seems to mean a mental activity which progresses from one thought to another in accordance with strict rules, namely rules that are clear, distinct, and exact. It might be better to call such thinking formal, or algorithmic, or deductive, in order not to limit the concept of logic to a one–sided and prejudicial conception. However, I do not want to focus on that, but rather on the other type of thinking. It is obvious from the context that critical thinking is different from logical thinking, not in the sense of being illogical, but rather in the sense that either it follows no rules or it follows rules that are not formal.2 One may speak of informal judgment to refer to this feature of critical thinking being suggested here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agassi, J. (1963), Towards an Historiography of Science. History and Theory, Beiheft 2. The Hague: Mouton.
Agassi, J. (1968), The Continuing Revolution: A History of Physics from the Greeks to Einstein. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Agassi, J. (1971), Faraday as a Natural Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Agassi, J., and I.C. Jarvie, eds. (1987), Rationality: The Critical View. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijoff.
Bartley, III, W.W., (1982), ‘Critical Study: The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Part III: Rationality, Criticism, and Logic’, Philosophia (Israel), vol. 11, pp. 121–221.
Bartley, III, W.W., (1984), The Retreat to Commitment, second edition. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Bartley, III, W.W., (1987), ‘Theories of Rationality’, in: G. Radnitsky and W.W. Bartley III (eds.), Evolutionary Epistemology, Theory of Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 205–216.
Brown, H.I. (1979), Perception, Theory and Commitment: The New Philosophy of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, H.I. (1987), Observation and Rationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, H.I. (1989), Rationality. London: Routledge.
Feyerabend, P.K. (1975), Against Method. London: NLB.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1980a), ‘The Concept of Judgment and Huygens’ Theory of Gravity’, Epistemologia (Genoa), vol. 3, pp. 185–218.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1980b), Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1984), ‘Informal Logic and the Theory of Reasoning’, Informal Logic, vol. vi, no. 2, July 1984, pp. 3–8.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1986), ‘The Methodological Background to Galileo’s Trial’, in: William A. Wal lace (ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, pp. 241–272.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1988a), ‘Empiricism, Judgment, and Argument: Toward an Informal Logic of Science’, Argumentation, vol. 2, pp. 313–335.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1988b), ‘Galileo’s Copernicanism and the Acceptability of Guiding Assumptions’ in: A. Donovan, L. Laudan, and R. Laudan (eds.), Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 49–67.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1988c), Gramsci and the History of Dialectical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Finocchiaro, M.A. editor and translator (1989a), The Galileo Affair: A Documentary History. Berke ley: University of California Press.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1989b), ‘Siegel on Critical Thinking’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 19, pp. 483–92.
Frisch, O.R. (1979), What Little I Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Galilei, G. (1967), Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (trans, by S. Drake), Second edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Koyrè, A. (1939), Etudes Galileennes, 3 vols.; Reprint. Paris: Hermann, 1966.
Kuhn, T.S. (1957), The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I., and A. Musgrave, eds. (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I., and E. Zahar (1975), ‘Why Did Copernicus’s Research Program Supersede Ptolemy’s?’, in: Westman (1975), pp. 354–383.
Levinson, P., ed. (1982), In Pursuit of Truth: Essays on the Philosophy of Karl Popper on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Humanities Press.
Lipman, M. (1988a), ‘The Critical Thinker: The Concept of Critical Thinking’, Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving, vol. 10, issue 3, May–June 1988, pp. 5–7.
Lipman, M. (1988b), ‘Critical Thinking – What Can It Be?’, Educational Leadership, vol. 46, no. 1, September 1988, pp. 38–3.
Margolis, H. (1988), Patterns, Thinking and Cognition: Toward a Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miller, D. (1982), ‘Conjectural Knowledge: Popper’s Solution to the Problem of Induction’, in: Levinson (1982), pp. 17–49.
Miller, D. (1987), ‘A Critique of Good Reasons’, in: Agassi and Jarvie (1987), pp. 343–58.
Millman, A. B. (1976), ‘The Plausibility of Research Programs’, in F. Suppe and P. D. Asquith, (eds.), PSA 1976: Proceedings of the 1976 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 140–148.
Pera, M. (1982), Apologia del metodo. Bari: Laterza.
Pera, M. (1987), ‘From Methodology to Dialectics’, in: A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986: Proceedings of the 1986 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 359–374.
Pera, M. (1988), ‘Breaking the Link Between Methodology and Rationality’, in: D. Batens and J. P. van Bendegen (eds.), Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 259–276.
Pera, M. (1991), Scienza e retorica. Bari: Laterza.
Popper, K. R. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
Popper, K. (1962a), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
Popper, K. (1962b), The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 2; Fourth edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Popper, K. (1974), ‘Reply to My Critics’, in Schilpp (1974), pp. 961–1197.
Price, D. J. de S. (1959), ‘Contra–Copernicus: A Critical Re–estimation of the Mathematical Planetary Theory of Ptolemy, Copernicus, and Kepler’, in: M. Clagett, (ed.), Critical Problems in the History of Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 197–218.
Quine, W. V. (1974), ‘On Popper’s Negative Methodology’, in: Schilpp (1974), pp. 218–220.
Schilpp, P. A., ed. (1974), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Shapere, D. (1984), Reason and the Search for Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Shapere, D. (1988a), ‘Doppelt Crossed’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 55, pp. 134–40.
Shapere, D. (1988b), ‘Rationalism and Empiricism: A New Perspective’, Argumentation, vol. 2, pp. 299–312.
Siegel, H. (1988), Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. Boston: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1995). Criticism, Reasoning, and Judgment in Science. In: Jarvie, I.C., Laor, N. (eds) Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 161. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4211-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0471-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive