Abstract
Universals play an important role in philosophical and scientific definitions of knowledge. For many writers to know means to possess an account composed of universals or, more recently, a theory. Some add that given a good theory one can forget about particulars. Thus Peter Medawar writes:
As science advances, particular facts are comprehended within, and therefore in a sense annihilated by, general statements of steadily increasing explanatory power and compass whereupon the facts need no longer be known explicitly. In all sciences we are being progressively relieved of the burden of singular instances, the tyranny of the particular. (The Art of the Soluble, London 1967, 114.)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
W. von Soden, Leistung und Grenze Sumerischer und Babylonischer Wissenschaft, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1965.
Cf. B.L. van der Waerden, Science Awakening, Groningen: Nordhoff 1954, chapter v.
Cf. however D.H. Fowler, The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1987 where completely new light is thown on the problem.
For the sophists, their ancestors and their opponents cf. Fritz Wehrli, Hauptrichtungen des Griechischen Denkens, Stuttgart/Zuerich: Artemis, 1964.
Virtue is discussed in Martha C. Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Cf. also K.J. Dover, Greek Popular Morality at the Time of Plato and Aristotle, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.
George Steiner, Death of Tragedy New York: Knopf, 1961 examines why after Shakespeare and Racine tragedy seemed difficult to achieve. It was opposed in antiquity by those who, like Plato, looked for a consistent definition of virtue. Cf. Euthyphro 7bff.
T.B.L. Webster, Athenian Culture and Society, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1973, chapter 4.
Details in Hans-Dieter Voigtlaender Der Philosoph und die Vielen, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag 1980.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feyerabend, P.K. (1995). Universals as Tyrants and as Mediators. In: Jarvie, I.C., Laor, N. (eds) Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 161. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4211-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0471-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive