Skip to main content

Universals as Tyrants and as Mediators

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 161))

Abstract

Universals play an important role in philosophical and scientific definitions of knowledge. For many writers to know means to possess an account composed of universals or, more recently, a theory. Some add that given a good theory one can forget about particulars. Thus Peter Medawar writes:

As science advances, particular facts are comprehended within, and therefore in a sense annihilated by, general statements of steadily increasing explanatory power and compass whereupon the facts need no longer be known explicitly. In all sciences we are being progressively relieved of the burden of singular instances, the tyranny of the particular. (The Art of the Soluble, London 1967, 114.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. von Soden, Leistung und Grenze Sumerischer und Babylonischer Wissenschaft, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. B.L. van der Waerden, Science Awakening, Groningen: Nordhoff 1954, chapter v.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. however D.H. Fowler, The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1987 where completely new light is thown on the problem.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For the sophists, their ancestors and their opponents cf. Fritz Wehrli, Hauptrichtungen des Griechischen Denkens, Stuttgart/Zuerich: Artemis, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Virtue is discussed in Martha C. Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. also K.J. Dover, Greek Popular Morality at the Time of Plato and Aristotle, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. George Steiner, Death of Tragedy New York: Knopf, 1961 examines why after Shakespeare and Racine tragedy seemed difficult to achieve. It was opposed in antiquity by those who, like Plato, looked for a consistent definition of virtue. Cf. Euthyphro 7bff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.B.L. Webster, Athenian Culture and Society, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1973, chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Details in Hans-Dieter Voigtlaender Der Philosoph und die Vielen, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feyerabend, P.K. (1995). Universals as Tyrants and as Mediators. In: Jarvie, I.C., Laor, N. (eds) Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 161. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4211-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0471-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics