Abstract
Robert Cohen’s contribution to the philosophy and history of science is well documented in his own writings, and in the prodigious publications of his Boston Colloquium. Less well known are his collegial connections with those in other fields. For some years he and I have been colleagues and friends, and have often made common cause at Boston University between his Center for the Philosophy and History of Science, and my Institute for Philosophy and Religion. Our office complexes are at opposite ends of the Philosophy Department at Boston University, and the symbolism of that spatial balance is significant for a Department which has historically made substantive contributions in both fields. Philosophers of religion, alas, have seldom known much about the history and philosophy of science, whereas philosophers of science have occasionally been quite knowledgeable about religious matters. Cohen is in this tradition. In a university community which boasts a number of “Rennaissance” men and women, Cohen is nevertheless distinctive in the broad range of his interests and sympathies, and his specific knowledge in a wide variety of fields. He and I have often discussed issues in the philosophy of religion, and on one occasion did a joint paper on scientific and religious ways of knowing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
De Anima, III, ch. 9.
John Herman Randall, Jr., Aristotle (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960), p. 77.
“Therefore, since everything is a possible object of thought, mind in order, as Anaxagoras says, to dominate, that is to know, must be pure from all admixture…” De Anima, III, ch. 4: 429a 18–20. All Aristotle quotations are from Richard McKeon, The Basic Works of Aristotle (New York: Random House, 1941).
De Anima, III, ch. 5, 430a, 15–20.
Posterior Analytics, II, ch. 19, 100b, 10–12.
Herman Randall, Jr., Aristotle (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960), p. 103.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), pp. 71–105.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), p. 71.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951),p. 72.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), p. 73.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), 77.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951),p. 81.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), p. 79.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951),p. 83.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), p. 110.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), pp. 111–112.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951), p. 113.
Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Vol. 1 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rouner, L.S. (1995). Science, Religion, and the Quest for Truth. In: Gavroglu, K., Stachel, J., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Science, Mind and Art. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 165. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0469-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0469-2_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2990-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0469-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive