Abstract
Shape optimization is a branch of the optimal control theory in which the control variable is connected with the geometry of the problem. The aim is to find a shape from an a priori defined class of domains, for wich the corresponding cost functional attains its minimum. Shape optimization of mechanical systems, behaviour of which is described by equations, has been very well analyzed from the mathematical, as well as from the mechanical point of view, see [1], [2], [3] and references therein. The aim of this contribution is to extend results to the case, in which the system is described by the so called variational inequalities. There are two reasons for doing that: 1) The behavior of many mechanical models can be described just using the framework of variational inequalities, see [4], [5]. 2) The optimal control of systems governed by variational inequalities has one specific feature, compared with problems governed by equations, namely the whole problem is nonsmooth. By nonsmoothness we mean the fact that the mapping: Control variable → state → cost functional is not continuously differentiable. Therefore we have to be very careful wi+h the choice of numerical minimization methods. In classical optimization problems we also often meet the situation when the resulting function which has to be minimized is nonsmooth in the above mentioned sense. But this is due to the nonsmoothness of the cost functional itself, or by the presence of constraints, etc. Such kind of explicit nonsmoothness can be usually overcome by introducing dummy variables, e.g. The source of the nonsmoothness in our kind of problems is different, namely it is due to the nonsmoothness of the inner mapping: control variable → state, i.e. this phenomena is more implicit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pironneau, O. (1984), “Optimal shape design for elliptic systems,” Springer series in Computational Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Banichuk, N. V. (1983), “Problems and methods of optimal structural design,” Plenum Press, New York.
Haug, E. J., Choi, K. K., Komkov (1986), “Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems,” Academic Press, Orlando.
Duvaut, G., Lions, J. L. (1976), “Inequalities in mechanics and physics,” Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 219, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Panagiotopoulos, P. D. (1985), “Inequality problems in mechanics and applications,” Birk-häuser, Boston.
Benedict, R. L., Taylor, J. E. (1981), Optimal design for elastic bodies in contact, in “Optimization of distributed parameter structures, Part II,” Haug, E. J. and Céa, J. (eds.), Nato Advances Study Institute Series, Series E, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen aan der Rijn, pp. 1553–1599.
Hlavaček, I., Haslinger, J., Nečas, J., Lovišek, J. (1988), “Numerical solution of variational inequalities,” Springer Series in Applied Mathematical Sciences 66, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Kikuchi, N., Oden, J. T. (1988), “Study of variational inequalities and finite element methods,” Mathematics and Computer Sciences for Engineers, SIAM.
Haslinger, J., Neittaanmäki, P. (1988), “Finite element approximation for optimal shape design: Theory and applications,” J. Wiley & Sons.
Necas, J. (1967), “Les méthodes directes en théorie des equations elliptiques,” Masson, Paris.
Céa, J. (1978), “Lectures on optimization theory and algorithms,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Glowinski, R., Lions, J. L., Trémolières, R. (1981), “Numerical analysis of variational inequalities, studies in mathematics and its applications,” North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Mignot, F. (1976), Contrôle dans les inéquations variationnelles elliptiques, J. Funct. Anal. 22, 25–39.
Sokolowski, J. (1981), Sensitivity analysis for a class of variational inequalities, in (Haug, Céa, 1981, Part II, see [6]).
Kiwiel, K. C. (1985), “Methods of descent for non-differentiable optimization,” Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1133, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Lemarechal, CL, Miffeir, R. (1978), “Nonsmooth optimization,” Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Klarbring, A., Haslinger, J. (1993), On almost constant contact stress distribution by shape optimization, Struct. Optim. 3, 213–216.
Haslinger, J., Klarbring, A., Shape optimization in unilateral contact problems using generalized reciprocal energy as objective functional, J. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Meth. Appl. (to appear).
Haslinger, J., Panagiotopoulos, P. D. (1984), Approximation of contact problems with friction by reciprocal variational formulations, Prod. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 98A, 365–383.
Feijoo, R. A., Fancello, E. A. (1992), A finite element approach for an optimal shape design in contact problems, in “Contact Mechanics International Symposium,” ed. A. Curnier, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 287–306.
Mäkelä, M. M., Neittaanmäki, P. (1992), “Nonsmooth optimization: Analysis and algorithms with applications to optimal control,” World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haslinger, J. (1995). Contact Shape Optimization. In: Herskovits, J. (eds) Advances in Structural Optimization. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0453-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0453-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4203-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0453-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive