Abstract
The concept of integrity is a normative one; it presupposes that some good is at stake. This essay does not attempt to define ‘integrity” in an ecological context but seeks to understand why integrity in that context is valuable and worthy of protection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Laura Westra, An Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity, (Lanham, MD. Rowman and Littlefield, 1994), p. 30.
Herman Daly, “Elements of Environmental Macroeconomics,” in Robert Costanza, ed., Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 33–46; especially, pp. 38–40.
Herman Daly, “Elements of Environmental Macroeconomics,” in Robert Costanza, ed., Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 38–40.
Harold Webber, “Aquabusiness,” in R. Colwell, A. Sinskey, and E. Pariser, eds., Biotechnology in the Marine Sciences, (New York: Wiley, 1984), pp. 115–116.
The literature offers two broad ways of responding to this argument. Many writers take the view that no matter how the technology of producing food and fiber progresses—no matter how far agricultural production becomes industrialized and thus becomes independent of farming—nevertheless prudence demands that we protect the soil for utilitarian reasons. For arguments of that kind, see R. Neil Sampson, Farmland or Wasteland: A Time to Choose (Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press, 1981)
John M. Harlin and Gigi M. Berardi, eds., Agricultural Soil Loss: Processes, Policies, and Prospects (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987). Many other writers take the view that even if science and technology can create abundant and cheap substitutes for soil, water, or whatever, these go only to the uses we make of the environment not to the value farms and other place shave for us. For an excellent presentation of this position, see Donald Worster, “A Sense of Soil: Agricultural Conservation and American Culture,” Agriculture and Human Values 2 (Fall 1985): 28–35, arguing that the soil has a “powerful meaning” (p. 33) for farmers and others and from this point of view, “The soil is a resource for which there is no substitute” (p. 34). For an instructive exchange of views, see Martin H. Rogoff and Stephen L. Rawlins, “Food Security: A Technological Alternative,” BioScience 37(11) (December 1987): 800–807, arguing that biotechnology can convert cheap and readily available biomass into a stable food supply, and David Orr, “Food Alchemy and Sustainable Agriculture,” BioScience 38(11) (December 1988): 801–802, arguing that even if technology is capable of making almost anything edible, we “should not confuse the results with a genuinely sustainable agriculture or culture, which rest on different premises” (p. 802). Orr observes: “Good agriculture is concern for the long-term health of the land and rural communities” (p. 802). See also the exchange of letters in Bioscience 39(6) (June 1989): 356; and Orr’s reply two issues later (p. 588).
Stephen H. Schneider, “Climate and Food: Signs of Hope, Despair, and Opportunity,” in Paul Erlich and John Holdren, eds., The Cassandra Conference (College Station: Texas A&M Press, 1985): 17–51; quotation at p. 42.
Stephen H. Schneider, “Climate and Food: Signs of Hope, Despair, and Opportunity,” in Paul Erlich and John Holdren, eds., The Cassandra Conference (College Station: Texas A&M Press, 1985): p. 42.
Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac (New York: Oxford University Press, 1966), p. 231.
George Boas, The Happy Beast: In French Thought of the Seventeenth Century (Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1933), p. 6.
See Ralph H. Lutts, The Nature Fakers: Wildlife, Science, and Sentiment (Denver: Fulcrum, 1990)
Frank Stewart, A Natural History of Nature Writing (Washington, DC: Island Press, 1995), esp. Chapter 5.
Gilbert White, The Natural History and Antiquities of Selbourne (London: Bensley, 1789), pp. 193
Gilbert White, The Natural History and Antiquities of Selbourne (London: Bensley, 1789), pp. 149
cited and quoted in Lawrence Buell, The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), p. 186.
Donald Worster, Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977), p. 10.
See Montaigne’s Essays II, xii, 2, 164.
Henry David Thoreau, Journal, vol. III, March 31, 1852.
Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Idea in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964, 1977).
Robert P. McIntosh, The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
See, for example, Donald Worster, “The Ecology of Order and Chaos,” Environmental History and Review 14 (Spring-Summer, 1990): 1–18.
Donald Worster, Nature’s Economy, p. 210.
Quoted and cited in A. O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1936, pbk. 1960), p. 71.
G. E. Hutchinson, “Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why are There So Many Kinds of Animals,” American Naturalist 93 (1959): 145–159.
G. E. Hutchinson, “Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why are There So Many Kinds of Animals,” American Naturalist 93 (1959), p. 143.
Sir Richard Blackmore, Creation, Bk. 12, 1712; quoted by Lovejoy, Sir Richard Blackmore, Creation, p. 195.
Frank B. Golley, A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), p. 107.
Frank B. Golley, A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), p. 22.
Frank B. Golley, A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), p. 108.
Stuart L. Pimm, The Balance of Nature?: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), p. 15.
See, for example, William H. Drury and Ian Nisbet, “Succession,” Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 54 (July 1973)
Joseph H. Connell and Ralph Slayter, “Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization,” The American Naturalist 111 (Nov.–Dec. 1977): 1119–44.
For a review, see Daniel Goodman, “The Theory of Diversity-Stability Relationships in Ecology,” Quarterly Review of Biology 50 (1975): 237–261.
For a review, see Scott Nixon, “Between Coastal Marshes and Coastal Waters—A Review of Twenty Years of Speculation and Research on the Role of Salt Marshes in Estuarine Productivity and Water Chemistry,” in P. Hamilton and K. MacDonald, eds., Estuarine and Wetland Processes (New York: Plenum Press, 1980).
L. Van Valen and F. Pitelka, “Intellectual Censorship in Ecology,” Ecology 55 (1974): 925–926.
Kristin Shrader-Frechette and E. D. McCoy, Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 81
cf. K. Shrader-Frechette and E. D. McCoy, “Theory Reduction and Explanation in Ecology,” Oikos 58 (1990): 109–114.
Shrader-Frechette and McCoy, Method in Ecology, p. 81.
For a review, see M. Sagoff, “Ethics, Ecology, and the Environment: Integrating Science and Law,” Tennessee Law Review 56 (Fall 1988): 77–229.
See “Preface” in Bernard Patten, ed., Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology vol. I (1971), p. xiv.
Linnie Marsh Wolfe, ed., John of the Mountains: The Unpublished Journals of John Muir (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979), p. 118.
Donald Worster, “The Ecology of Order and Chaos,” in Worster, The Wealth of Nature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 161. Worster cites as an example the work of Odum’s brother, H. T. Odum, who developed engineering models of ecosystems. See, e.g., Peter Taylor, “Technological Optimism, H.T. Odum, and the Partial Transformation of the Ecological Metaphor after World War II,” Journal of the History of Biology 21 (Summer 1988): 213–244.
Frank Forcella, “Commentary: Ecological Biotechnology,” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 65 (1984), p. 434.
J. L. Harper, “The Contributions of Terrestrial Plant Studies to the Development of the Theory of Ecology,” in C.E. Goulden, ed., The Changing Scenes in the Natural Sciences: 1776–1976 (Philadelphia: Academy of Natural Sciences, 1977), pp. 139–57.
J. L. Harper, “The Contributions of Terrestrial Plant Studies to the Development of the Theory of Ecology,” in C.E. Goulden, ed., The Changing Scenes in the Natural Sciences: 1776–1976 (Philadelphia: Academy of Natural Sciences, 1977), p. 148.
H. A. Gleason, “The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association,” Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53 (1926), p. 25.
See Robert Colwell, “What’s New? Community Ecology Discovers Biology,” in P. Price, C. Slobodchikoff, and W. Gaud, eds., A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems (New York: Wiley, 1984).
See L. B. Slobodkin, D. B. Botkin, B. Maguire, B. Moore, III, and H. Morowitz, “On the Epistemology of Ecosystem Analysis,” in V. Kennedy, ed., Estuarine Perspectives (New York: Academic Press, 1980), esp. p. 506.
Daniel Botkin, Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-first Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 62.
S. J. Gould, “Balzan Prize to Ernst Mayr,” Science 222 (1984), p. 255.
S. J. Gould, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (New York: WW. Norton, 1989), p. 283.
S. J. Gould, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (New York: WW. Norton, 1989), p. 284
E. O. Wilson, The Diversity of Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), p. 345.
E. O. Wilson, Biophilia: The Human Bond With Other Species (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), p. 115.
Ronald Dworkin, Life’s Dominion (New York: Knopf, 1993), p. 75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sagoff, M. (1995). The Value of Integrity. In: Westra, L., Lemons, J. (eds) Perspectives on Ecological Integrity. Environmental Science and Technology Library, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0451-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0451-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4202-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0451-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive