Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 5))

Abstract

In future-oriented studies, scenario building and analysis are becoming increasingly fashionable. This apparent increase in popularity is, however, somewhat misleading: many studies in trend analysis, comparisons of static equilibria, variant analysis and sensitivity analysis are presented nowadays as scenario studies . We prefer to use the term ‘scenario’ in the stricter sense: a scenario is a description of the current situation, of a possible or desirable future state as well as of the series of events that could lead from the current state of affairs to this future state

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  • CPB, 1992. A long-term scenario study of the world economy 1990–2015, Sdu Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1979. Facing the Future: Mastering the Probable and Managing the Unpredictable, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR, 1983. A Policy-Oriented Survey of the Future; Towards a Broader Perspective, Summary of the twenty-fifth Report to the Government, Staatsuitgeverij, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Ascher, W.L. (1978). Forecasting, an appraisal for policy-makers and planners, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissie van de Europese Gemeenschappen, 1968. Dossier over het gemeenschappelijk landbouwbeleid, A-F, Brussel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities, 1991. The development and future of the Common Agricultural Policy. Proposals of the Commission, COM (91) 258 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEI-DLO Landbouw-Economisch Instituut/IKC, 1994. Voorbij het verleden; Drie toekomstbeeldenvoor de Nederlandse agribusiness, 1990–2015. Onderzoeksverslag 127, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van LNV. Natuurbe leidsplan (Nature Policy Plan), Tweede Kamer 1989–1990, 21 149, nos. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRLO — Nationale Raad voor Landbouwkundig Onderzoek, 1993. Toekomstverkenning ruraal grondgebruik (Exploration of Rural Land Use in the Future), NLRO-rapport no. 93/20, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regeerakkoord (Policy Agreement), 1994, in Voorlichtingsraad, Kabinet-Kok. Keuzen voor de toekomst (The Kok Administration, Choices for the future), Sdu Uitgeverij, Den Haag, pp. 37–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichting Nederland Nu Als Ontwerp, 1987. Tentoonstelling Nieuw Nederland (Exhibition The New Netherlands), Beurs van Berlage, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J. & F. van Vught, 1981. Nederland op zoek naar zijn toekomst (The Netherlands looking for its future), Het Spectrum BV/Intermediair, Utrecht/Antwerpen, 330 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeneklaas, F.R., L.M. van den Berg, D. Slothouwer & G.F.P. IJkelenstam, 1994. Rhine Basin Study: Land use projections based on biophysicalandsocio-economicalanalysis. Volume 4. Land Use: Past, Presentand Future, DLO Winand Staring Centre/Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment (RIZA), Report 85.4, Wageningen/Lelystad.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR — Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, 1992. Ground for choices. Four perspectives for the rural areas in the European Community, Sdu Uitgeverij, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR — Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, 1989. Government and Future-Research, Summary of the Thirty-fourth Report to the Government, Staatsuitgeverij, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Fukuyama, F., 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J.W., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston Michael, D.N., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • “With both feet planted firmly in mid-air”, in: Futures, April 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, 1994. Duurzame risico’s: een blijvend gegeven. (Sustainable risks: a lasting factor). Report to the Government, SDU publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirsig, R.M., 1991. Lila; An inquiry into morals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R., 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Veeneklaas, F.R., van den Berg, L.M., Schoonenboom, I.J., van de Klundert, A.F. (1995). Scenarios as a tool. In: Schoute, J.F.T., Finke, P.A., Veeneklaas, F.R., Wolfert, H.P. (eds) Scenario Studies for the Rural Environment. Environment & Policy, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0441-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0441-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4197-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0441-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics