Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Ecology, Economy & Environment ((ECEE,volume 5))

  • 250 Accesses

Abstract

The Great Plains is a vast and diverse area. Its 10 states, covering almost one-third of the U.S. land mass, are mostly semiarid. Because of its size and geographic definition, the region has dramatic extremes in elevation, temperature, precipitation, and in wind direction and velocity. The growing season varies from 110 to more than 300 days. Annual precipitation ranges from 12 to more than 30 inches. The semiarid character results in important parts of the region being on the extensive margin between cropping and rangeland grazing. Further, year-to-year variability in precipitation gives rise to strategies for which risk management is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bajwa, R. S., W. M. Crosswhite, J. E. Hostetler, and O. W. Wright. 1992. Agricultural irrigation and water use. Agricultural Information Bulletin 638. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangsund, Dean A., and F. Larry Leistritz. 1991. Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains. Agricultural Economics Report 275-S. North Dakota State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Robert M., Melvin D. Skold, James S. Berry, and William P. Kemp. 1992. The economics threshold for grasshopper control on public rangelands. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(l):56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Plains Agricultural Council. 1992. Agriculture and water quality in the Great Plains: Status and recommendations. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 140. Water Quality Task Force (Ronald D. Lacewell, Chairman), Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorson, Ardell D. 1990. Cropping systems and N fertilization for efficient water use in the central Great Plains. In Conservation tillage: Proceedings, Great Plains Conservation Tillage Symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 131. Bismark, North Dakota: Great Plains Agricultural Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, Ralph E., and Olaf E. Kula. 1991. Economics of livestock and crop production on post-CRP land. In The Conservation Reserve-Yesterday, today, and tomorrow: Symposium proceedings, Washington,DC, Jan. 14, 1991, ed. L. A. Joyce, J. E. Mitchell, and M. D. Skold. USDA-FS General Technical Report RM-203. Fort Collins: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, John S. 1990. Conservation tillage systems in Kansas. In Conservation tillage: Proceedings, Great Plains Conservation Tillage Symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 131. Bismark, North Dakota: Great Plains Agricultural Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • High Plains Associates (Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc., Black and Veatch, Arthur D. Little, Inc.). 1982. Six-state High Plains-Ogallala aquifer regional resources study. Report to the U.S. Department of Commerce and the High Plains Study Council, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, Fred, Judy Sommer, and Mindy Petrulis. 1991. Agriculture in the Great Plains: An assessment of its importance to the region’s economy. In Proceedings, Great Plains Agricultural Council. Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, Linda A. 1989. An analysis of the range forage situation in the United States: 1989–2040. USDA-FS General Technical Report RM-180. Fort Collins: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, Linda, and Melvin D. Skold. 1988. Implications of changes in the regional ecology of the Great Plains. In Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program in the Great Plains: Symposium proceedings, Denver, Colorado, Sept. 16–18, 1987, ed. J. E. Mitchell. USDA-FS General Technical Report RM-158. Fort Collins: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraenzel, Carl F. 1955. The Great Plains in transition. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Kenneth R. 1991. Cattle feeding, 1962–89 location and feedlot size. Agricultural Economic Report 642. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchler, August W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. New York: American Geographical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonnell, Lawrence J. 1990. The water transfer process as a management option for meeting changing water demands, Vols. I and II. Boulder, Colorado: Water Resources Law Center, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. A., and D. G. Westfall. 1990. Sustainable dryland agroecosystems. In Conservation tillage: Proceedings, Great Plains Conservation Tillage Symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 131. Bismark, North Dakota: Great Plains Agricultural Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Dean (private communication). 1992. Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,U.S. Department of Agriculture, Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salassi, Michael E. 1990. Representative U.S. wheat farms. Statistical Bulletin 786. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salassi, Michael E., William D. McBride, and Robert A. Pelly. 1991. Representative U.S. corn farms. Statistical Bulletin 820. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, J. S., M. G. Moravek, E. E. Alberts, and K. D. Frank. 1991. Maize production impact on groundwater quality. Journal of Environmental Quality 20:12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skold, Melvin D. 1977a. Natural resource conservation and use implications of price and income policies. In Farm and Food Policy Symposium: Proceedings. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 84. Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional potentials for cropland use shifts. Natural Resource Economics Working Paper 23. Washington,D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropland retirement policies and their effects on land use in the Great Plains. Journal of Production Agriculture 2(3):197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communication to Great Plains Agricultural Council correspondents. Great Plains Agricultural Council, Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic issues related to sustainable agricultural systems in the Great Plains. In Sustainable agriculture for the Great Plains: Symposium proceedings. USDA-ARS-89. Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skold, Melvin D., and Robert A. Young. 1987. The role of natural resources in a changing Great Plains economy. In The rural Great Plains of the future: Symposium proceedings. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 125. Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. R., M. D. Skold, and W. O. Willis. 1979. The economics of snow management: An application of game theory. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 4(2):61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B. A. 1990. Limits, bounds, and the future of conservation tillage in the Great Plains. In Conservation tillage: Proceedings, Great Plains Conservation Tillage Symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 131. Bismark, North Dakota: Great Plains Agricultural Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John D. 1984. Land use in the Great Plains. AGES 840329. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Natural Resources Economics Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. 1989. 1987 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1, Geographic Area Series. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1991. Agricultural statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA/ERS). 1992. RTD updates: Conservation reserve. Washington, D.C.: USDA-ERS, Resources and Technology Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA/SCS). 1987. The second RCA appraisal (Review draft). Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, B. K., M. J. Shaffer, M. K. Brodahl, D. Dubois, and D. G. Wagner. 1993. Regional distributions of NO3-N leaching. Unpublished manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skold, M.D. (1995). Agricultural Systems and Technologies of the Great Plains. In: Johnson, S.R., Bouzaher, A. (eds) Conservation of Great Plains Ecosystems: Current Science, Future Options. Ecology, Economy & Environment, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0439-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0439-5_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4196-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0439-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics