Skip to main content

Methods of Evading Detection by a Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Network under Special Conditions

  • Chapter
Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 303))

  • 352 Accesses

Abstract

Progress in negotiations towards a comprehensive prohibition of nuclear testing and the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons depends to a considerable extent on the presence and effectiveness of techniques for the identification of underground nuclear explosions (UNE), techniques proposed by experts for verifying the monitoring of such agreements. It is generally considered [1, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13] that the seismic verification technique ensures, at present, a permissible level of reliability for detecting and identifying UNE with yields not less than 1 - 2 kt. This threshold could be considered as admissible from the standpoint of signing a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This is because testing a small-yield nuclear device does not allow one to create a real nuclear weapon. Nuclear charges with yields less than 1 kt cannot compete with chemical charges of the same total yield and same striking effect. However, the possibility of evading a seismic monitoring network by explosions with yields less than 1 kt should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adushkin V. and Spivak A. (1990) Methods of seismic monitoring and the problem of underground test ban. -Physics of the Earth, No. 12, 3–5 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adushkin V. and Spivak A. (1993) Geomechanics of large-scale explosions. “NEDRA”, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adushkin V., Spivak A. and Kulikov V. (1993) Influence of structure-tectonical setting of geophysical medium on the seismic effects of underground nuclear explosions. -Physics of the Earth, No. 12, 54–64 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bronnikov D. and Spivak A. (1981) Influence of the shielding gap on the explosion action in the solid medium -Physical-technical problems of mine, No. 3, 62–70 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rodin G. (1974) Seismology of underground nuclear explosions. “MIR”, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seismic verification of Nuclear Testing Treaties (1992) /Translating editors: V. Adushkin and A. Spivak. “MIR”, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sidorin A. (1994) The contribution of seismology to the arms race reduction. -Russia’s Federal System of Seismological Networks and Earthquake Prediction, No. 2, 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spivak A. (1973) The compressional waves in the solid medium due to explosion in an air-filled cavity.-Physics of burning and explosion, No. 2, 263–268 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adushkin V. and Spivak A. (1994) Geological Characterization and Mechanics of Underground Nuclear Explosions. Defense Nuclear Agency, Alexandria, VA, U.S.A.-793 p.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alewine R.W. (1985) Seismic Sensing of Soviet Tests, Defense 85, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evernden J.F., Archambeau C.B., Cranswick E. (1986) Evaluation of Seismic Decoupling and Underground Nuclear Monitoring Using High-Frequency Seismic Data. Review of Geophysics, 24, No. 2, 143–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy J.R., Bennett T.J. (1982) A Discrimination Analysis of Short Period Regional Seismic Data at Tonto Forest Observatory. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 72, No. 4, 1351–1366.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ringdal F. (1985) Seismological Verification of Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Workshop on Seismological Verification of Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, June 4–7, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spivak, A.A. (1996). Methods of Evading Detection by a Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Network under Special Conditions. In: Husebye, E.S., Dainty, A.M. (eds) Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. NATO ASI Series, vol 303. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4187-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0419-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics