Skip to main content

Environmental Aspects of Subsurface Drainage Projects

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 16))

Abstract

Irrigation and drainage projects affect the physical, chemical, and biological components of the ecosystem and their eventual success depends on how adequately the environmental aspects are addressed at the planning and design phases. Drainage is generally required to combat the twin problems of waterlogging and soil salinity and to ensure sustained irrigated agriculture in the arid and semi-arid regions. While the benefits of drainage can be counted in terms of improved crop yields and increased economic gains, the cost to the environment may also be high. Environmental impacts may be positive or negative and may occur both on and off site. Their relative importance should be considered in the context of the socio-economic conditions and evaluated on both short and long term bases. The positive on site impacts of drainage projects, besides increased agricultural production and improved water regime and microclimate, also include reduction in water borne diseases and increased social, cultural and employmental opportunities. Among the negative offsite impacts, the concern for the disposal of saline drainage effluent, historically confined to major soluble salts and plant nutrients, now also includes toxic concentrations of several trace elements and pesticides. Reliable estimates of the volume and composition of drainage effluent in time arc needed to envisage and plan environmentally acceptable strategies for its disposal or treatment. Public health issues also need to be addressed.

The paper reviews the environmental issues related to drainage projects and identifies the technical options for the management, reuse and disposal of drainage effluent. Improved on-farm water management practices for minimizing the volume and salt load of drainage water, relative merits of different modes of conjuntive use of fresh and saline water including drainage effluent, and water treatment options are discussed. An example on the application of a numerical model to compare the drainage salt load under alternate drainage designs during reclamation of a 2000 ha highly waterlogged saline area in Haryana is presented. Future research and monitoring needs are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE), 1981.Irrigation scheduling for water and energy conservation in the 80’s. Proc. ASAE Irrigation Scheduling Conference, St. Joseph, Michigan, 231 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, W., 1985. The rising water table and development of waterlogging in Northwestern India. A Drainage Sub-Sector Report, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmans, C., Wesseling, J.G. and Feddes, R.A., 1983.Simulation model of the water balance of cropped soil: SWATRE. J. Hydrology. 63: 271– 286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birley, M.H., 1989. Guidelines for forecasting the vector-borne disease implications of water resources development. WHO/FAO/UNEP Panel of Experts of Environmental Management for Vector Control.PEEM Guidelines Series n2. WHO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A.K., 1985. Evaluating irrigation impact, guidelines for project management. Ceres, 106: 23– 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-ashry, M.T., Schilfgaarde, J.V. and Schiffman, S. 1985. Salinity pollution from irrigated agriculture. J. Soil and Water cons., Jan.-Feb.: 48-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feddes, R.A., Kowalik, P.J. and Zaradng, H., 1978. Simulation of water use and crop yield. Simulation monograph. PUDOC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 189

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg, S.K. 1993. Fish Culture. In: Salinity Research In H.A.U. (Ed. H.R.Manchanda, S.P.S. Karwasra, H.C. Sharma), CCS. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, India, 103– 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, T. K. and Grismer, M.E., 1989. Irrigation and drainage strategies in salinity-affected regions. J. Irri. Drain. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.,115(2), 255– 283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, C. 1976. Problems and concepts in irrigation use. In: Role of irrigation in the development of India’s agriculture, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, Bombay, pp. 10– 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, P.K. and Agnihotri, A.K., 1984. An assessment od adverse effects of canal irrigation in India. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 38: 528– 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamra, S.K., Singh, S.R., Rao, K.V.G.K. and van Genuchten, M. Th., 1991 a. A semidiscrete model for water and solute movement in tile-drained soils: 1. Governing equations and solution. Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 2439– 2447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamra, S.K., Singh, S.R., Rao, K.V.G.K. and van Genuchten, M. Th., 1991 b. A semidiscrete model for water and solute movement in tile-drained soils: 2. Field validation and applications. Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 2449– 2456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamra, S. K., Rao, K. V. G. K., Singh, O. P. and Oosterbann, R. J., 1992. Effect of drain-depth on salinity control in irrigated lands of serai-arid regions. Proc. 5th Intern. Drainage Workshop, Lahore, Pakistan, vol. II, 2.78– 2.86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamra, S.K., Rao, K. V. G. K. and Sharma, D.P., 1993. Design and evaluation of drainage measures for watertable and salinity control in arid soils. (Draft) Annual Report 1992–1993, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovda, V.A., 1983. Loss of productive land due to salinisation. Ambio., 12(2): 91– 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesaffre, B., 1992. Overview of diagnosis and identification of problematic soils. Proc. 5th Intl. Drainage Workshop, Lahore, ICID-CIID, IWASRI, Vol.1, 17– 57. .

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey, J., Roberts, C., Penberth, M. and Vasek, C., 1986. An agricultural dilemma: drainage water and toxics disposal in the San Joaquin Valley. Spec. Publ. 3319. Agric. Expt. Sta., Univ. California, Riverside, CA, U.S.A., 56pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, D.C., 1977. Multiobjective Water resources Planning. Water Resources Monograph 4, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makin, I.W. and Goldsmith, H., 1988. Selection of drainage and its phased implementation for salinity control. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 2: 109– 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minhas, P.S. and Gupta, R.K., 1992. Quality of Irrigation Water-Assessment and Management. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 123pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, J.F. and Bolton, P., 1991. Environmental effects of irrigation, drainage and flood control projects-checklist for environmental impact indication. Working Group on Environmental Impacts of Irrigation and Drainage, ICID, Draft Report OD/TN 50, HR Wallingford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nour el-Din, M.M., King, I. P. and Tanji, K. K., 1987a. A salinity management model: I. Development. J. Irri. Drain. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 113(4), 440– 453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nour el-Din, M.M., King, I. P. and Tanji, K. K., 1987b. A salinity management model: II. 1 and 2-D applications. J. Irri. Drain. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 113(4), 454– 468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbaan, R.J. and Lima Pedroso de, 1989. SALTMOD Manual, International Institue for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S., 1990. Saving water for agriculture. In: State of the World 1989: a World Watch Institute Report on Progress Towards a Sustainable Society, World Watch Institute, Washington, D.C., 39– 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, G.G.S.N. and Rao, K.V.G.K., 1990. Disposal of subsurface drainage waters through evaporation ponds in Haryana. Indian J. Agril. Sciences, 60(2): 97– 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K.V.G.K., Singh, O.P., Gupta, R.K., Kamra, S.K., Pandey, R. S., Kumbhare, P. S. and Abrol, I. P., 1986. Drainage Investigations for Salinity Control in Haryana. Bull. 10, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, J.D., 1984. New strategy for using saline waters for irrigation. In: Water Today and Tomorrow, Proc. Specialty Conference of Irrigation and Drainage Div., ASCE, Flagstaff, Ariz. (USA), July 24–26, 231– 236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, J.D., 1990. Overview: diagnosis of salinity problems and selection control practices. In: Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management (ed. K.K. Tanji). Manual 71, Amer. Soc. Civil Eng., New York, 18– 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg, I. and Shalhevet, J., 1984. (Eds.) Soil Salinity Under Irrigation : Processes and Management. Springer-Verlag, New York, 349 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Gurbachan, 1993. Agroforestry systems for optimal water use in salt affected soils. In: Sustainable Irrigation in Saline Environment (Ed. N.K. Tyagi, S.K. Kamra, P.S. Minhas and N.T.Singh), CSSRI, Karnal, India, 125– 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, R. W., 1978. A water management model for shallow watertable soils . Tech. Rep. 134, Water Resour. Res. Inst., North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanji, K.K., 1977. A conceptual hydro-salinity model for predicting salt load in irrigation return flow. Managing saline water for irrigation. Texas Tech. Univ., 49– 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanji, K. K. (Ed.), 1990. Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. Manual 71, Amer. Soc. Civil Eng., New York, 619 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen, M., 1989. Guidelines for the incorporation of health safeguards in irrigation projects through Intersectoral co-operation. WHO/FAO/UNEP Panel of Experts on Environmental Management of Vector Control. PEEM Guidelines Series n1. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 1985. Studies on the use of saline water in command areas of irrigation projects, Haryana, India: Interim technical report (draft) by Haryana Minor Irrigation and Tubewell Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA), 1988. Private communication, 94, Ferozepur Road, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamra, S.K., Rao, K.V.G.K. (1996). Environmental Aspects of Subsurface Drainage Projects. In: Singh, V.P., Kumar, B. (eds) Water-Quality Hydrology . Water Science and Technology Library, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0393-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0393-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4176-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0393-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics