Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 16))

  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

The effect of the dynamic hydraulic diffusivity in kinematic-with-diffusion overland flow modeling has been tested. Unlike the kinematic hydraulic diffusivity, the dynamic hydraulic diffusivity is a function of the Vedemikov number. The results of numerical experiments showed a small lag in the rising limb when comparing two equilibrium rising hydrographs using kinematic and dynamic hydraulic diffusivities. The existence of the lag is attributed to the error of the solution that specifically excludes inertia. The error was quantified by integrating the absolute value of the difference between the two rising hydrographs, dividing this difference by the total runoff volume and expressing it as a percentage. The error is small and likely to be within 0.35 percent for a wide range of realistic flow conditions. Since the dynamic effect is shown to be small throughout a wide range of bottom slopes, a diffusion wave model with inertia may be all that is required to model the overland flow dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chow, V. T., and Ben-Zvi, A. (1973). “Hydrodynamic Modeling of Two-dimensional Watershed Flow.” Journal of the Hydraulics Division ,ASCE, 99(11), 2023–2040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craya, A. (1952). “The Criterion of the Possibility of Roll Wave Formation.” Gravity Waves, National Bureau of Standards Circular No. 521 ,141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunge, J. A. (1969). “On the Subject of a Flood Propagation Computation Method (Muskingum Method).” Journal of Hydraulic Research ,7(2), 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooge, J. C. I. (1973). Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems. Tech. Bull., No. 1468, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooge, J. C. I., Strupczewski, W. B., and Napiorkowski, J. J. (1982). “Hydrodynamic Derivation of Storage Parameters in the Muskingum Model.” Journal of Hydrology ,54,371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, S. (1951). “On the Propagation of Flood Waves.” Bulletin Disaster Prevention Research Institute ,Kyoto University, 1(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEC-1, Flood Hydrograph Package: User’s Manual. (1990). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif., September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perumal, M. (1992). Comment on “New Perspective on the Vedernikov Number.” Water Resources Research ,28(6), 1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, V. M., and Simons, D. B. (1977). “Shallow Wave Propagation in Open Channel Flow.” Journal of the Hydrauclis Division ,ASCE, 103(12), 1461–1476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, V. M., and Yevjevich, V. (1978). “Muskingum-Cunge Method with Variable Parameters.” Journal of the Hydraulics Division ,ASCE, 104(12), 1663–1667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, V. M. (1986). “Diffusion Wave Modeling of Catchment Dynamics.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ,ASCE, 112(8), 716–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, V. M. (1989a). Engineering Hydrology, Principles and Practices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, V. M. (1989b). “Diffusion Wave Overland Flow Module.” Technical Report prepared for USGS Water Resources Division, Stennis Space Center, Miss., June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, V. M. (1991a). “The Kinematic Wave Controversy.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ,ASCE, 117(4), 511–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, V. M. (1991b). “New Perspective on the Vedernikov Number.” Water Resources Research ,27(7), 1777–1779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayfur, G., M. L. Kavvas, and R. S. Govindaraju. (1993). Applicability of St. Venant Equations for Two-dimensional Overland Flow Over Rough Infiltrating Surfaces. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ,119:51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooding, R. A. (1965). “A Hydraulic Model for the Catchment-Stream Problem.” Journal of Hydrology ,3, 254–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ponce, V.M., Dillenberger, K.T. (1996). Effect of Vedernikov Number on Overland Flow Dynamics. In: Singh, V.P., Kumar, B. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydrology and Water Resources, New Delhi, India, December 1993. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0389-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0389-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4174-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0389-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics