Abstract
One of the reasons for the lack of consensus on how to measure orthographic processing is that orthographic processing involves multiple kinds of orthographic knowledge and different investigators are focusing on different kinds of orthographic knowledge (see Introduction to Volume I). Table 1 from that introduction is reproduced on page 2 to provide a conceptual framework for discussing the kind(s) of orthographic knowledge considered by the author(s) of each of the chapters in Volume II.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott, R.D., & Berninger, V. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 478–508.
Abbott, R., & Berninger, V. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In G. Reid Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities. New views on measurement issues (pp. 163–183). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Berninger, V. (1987). Global, component, and serial procedures for printed words in beginning reading, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 387–418.
Berninger, V. (1989). Orchestration of multiple codes in developing readers: An alternative model of lexical access. International Journal of Neuroscience, 48, 85–104.
Berninger, V. (1994). Reading and writing acquisition, A developmental neuropsychological perspective. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (1994). Multiple orthographic and phonological codes in literacy acquisition: An evolving research program. In V.W. Berninger (Ed), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 277–317). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., & Shurtleff, H. (1990). Developmental changes in interrelationships among visible language codes and oral language codes and reading and spelling. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 45–67.
Berninger, V., Chen, A., & Abbott, R. (1988). A test of the multiple connections model of reading acquisition. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42, 283–295.
Berninger, V., Proctor, A., DeBruyn, I., & Smith, R. (1988). Relationship between levels of oral and written language in beginning readers. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 341–357.
Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Readig and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257–280.
Berninger, V., Yates, C., & Lester, K. (1991). Multiple orthographic codes in reading and writing acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 115–149.
Calfee, R.C., & Henry, M.K. (1985). Project READ: An inservice model for training classroom teachers in effective reading instruction. In J.V. Hoffman (Ed.), Effective teaching of reading: Research and practice (pp. 199–229). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
Carr, T., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 5 (pp. 1–82). New York: Academic Press.
Ehri, L. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In V. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 311–338). London: Academic Press.
Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to reading. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Estes, W.K., Allmeyer, D.H., & Reder, S.M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 1–15.
Gough, P., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gough, P.B., & Walsh, M.A. (1991). Chinese, Phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher of English. In S.A. Brady & D.P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 199–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Henderson, L. (1984) (Ed.). Introduction to Orthographies and reading. Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 1–9). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Henry, M. (1989). Children’s word structure knowledge: Implications for decoding and spelling instruction. Reading and Writing, 1, 135–152.
Henry, M. (1993). Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 227–241.
Hilgard, E., & Bower, G. (1975). Theories of learning. Fourth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jackson, N., & Butterfield, E. (1989). Reading-level matched designs: Myths and realities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 387–412.
Johnson, N. (1978). Coding processes in memory. In W.K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 6, pp. 87–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johnson, N. (1979). The role of letters in word identification: A test of the pattern-unit model Memory & Cognition, 7, 496–504.
Lehmkuhle, S. (1993a). Neurological basis of visual processes in reading. In D. Willows, R. Kruk, & E. Corcos, Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities (pp. 77–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lehmkuhle, S. (1993b). A defective visual pathway in children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 989–996.
Lehmkuhle, S. (in press). Deficits in parallel visual processing in children with reading disability and in the elderly. In L. Dillala & S. Clancy (Eds.), Assessments of biological mechanisms across the life span. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Livingstone, M.S., Rosen, G.D., Drislane, F., & Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 88, 7943–7947.
Lovegrove, W., Bowling, A., Badcock, D., & Blackwood, M. (1980). Specific reading disability: Differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. Science, 210, 439–440.
Lovegrove, W., & Williams, M. (1993). Visual temporal processing deficits in specific reading disability. In D. Willows, R. Kruk, & E. Corcos (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities (pp. 311–329). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
Olson, R., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In V.W. Berninger (Ed), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27–71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Perfetti, C. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, I. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 321–339.
Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
Stanovich, K. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.
Van Orden, G., Pennington, B., & Stone, G. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 1–35.
Vellutino, F., Scanion, D., & Tanzman, M. (1991). Bridging the gap between cognitive and neuropsychological conceptualizations of reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 181–203.
Venezky, R. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
Venezky, R., & Massaro, D. (1979). The role of orthographic regularity in word recognition. In L. Resnick & P. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading. Volume 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wagner, R., & Barker, T. (1994). The development of orthographic processing ability. In V.W. Berninger (Ed), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 243–276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wijk, A. (1966). Rules of pronunciation for the English language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berninger, V.W. (1995). Introduction to the Varieties of Orthographic Knowledge II: Relationships to Phonology, Reading, and Writing. In: Berninger, V.W. (eds) The Varieties of Orthographic Knowledge. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0385-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0385-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4172-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0385-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive