Summary
The common cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) provides a major focus for improvement of crop quality through genetic engineering. Identification of ripening-related cDNAs has enabled the modification of specific aspects of ripening by manipulating gene expression in transgenic plants. By utilizing ‘antisense RNA’ to modify expression of ripening genes, we have inhibited the production of the cell wall - metabolising enzymes polygalacturonase and pectinesterase and created transgenic plants that contain, effectively, single, targeted mutations affecting these genes. Furthermore, this approach has been used with previously unidentified cDNA clones to enable both functional identification and manipulation of genes involved in ethylene production (ACC oxidase) and carotenoid biosynthesis (phytoene synthase). The use of antisense RNA targeted to specific genes to alter ripening phenotypes and improve commercial utility of fruit by affecting shelf-life, processing characteristics and nutritional content is discussed.
We have used the extreme ripening-impaired mutant, ripening inhibitor (rin) to identify additional genes implicated in the ripening process. This approach has resulted in the cloning of several novel ripening-related mRNAs which are now being studied by antisense experiments. This may enable identification and manipulation of additional genes involved in processes such as softening, flavour and aroma generation and susceptibility to pathogens.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Abbreviations
- ACC:
-
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
- PE:
-
pectinesterase
- PG:
-
polygalacturonase
- SAM:
-
S-adenosyl methionine
- SARs:
-
scaffold attachment regions
References
Allen, G.C., G.E. Hall, L.C. Childs,A.K. Wiessinger, S. Spiker & W.F. Thompson, 1993. Scaffold attachmentregionsincrease reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant cells. Plant Cell5: 603–613.
Armstrong, G.A.,M. Alberti & J.E. Hearst, 1990. Conserved enzymes mediate the earlyreactions of carotenoid biosynthesis in non-photosynthetic and photosyntheticprokaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 9975–9979.
Bird, C.R.,C.J.S. Smith, J.A. Ray, P. Moureau, M.W. Bevan, A.S. Bird, S. Hughes, P.C.Morris, D. Grierson & W. Schuch, 1988. The tomato polygalacturonase geneand ripening specific expression in transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 11:651–662.
Bird, C.R., J.A.Ray, J.D. Fletcher, J.M. Boniwell, A.S. Bird, C. Teulieres, I. Blain, P.M.Bramley & W. Schuch, 1991. Using antisense RNA to study genefunction: Inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis in transgenic tomatoes.Bio-Technology 9: 635–639.
Bouzayen, M., A.Hamilton, S. Picton, S. Barton & D. Grierson, 1992. Identification of genesfor the ethylene-forming enzyme and inhibition of ethylene synthesis intransgenic plants using antisense genes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 20: 76–79.
Breyne, P., M.Van Montague, A. Depiicker & G. Gheysen, 1992. Characterisation of a plantscaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgeneexpression in tobacco. Plant Cell 4: 463–471.
Crookes, P.R.& D. Grierson, 1983. Ultrastructure of tomato fruit ripening and the roleof polygalacturonase isoenzymes in cell wall degradation. Plant Physiol. 72:1088–1093.
Davies, K.M.& D. Grierson, 1989. Identification of cDNA clones for tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum) mRNAs that accumulate during fruit ripening andleaf senescence in response to ethylene. Planta 179: 73–80.
DellaPenna, D.,D.C. Alexander & A.B. Bennett, 1986. Molecular cloning of tomato fruitpolygalacturonase: analysis of polygalacturonase mRNA levels during ripening.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA83: 6420–6424.
Fray, R.G. &D. Grierson, 1993. Identification and genetic analysis of normal and mutantphytoene synthase genes of tomato by sequencing, complementation andco-suppression. Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 589–602.
Giovannoni, J.J.,D. DellaPenna, A.B. Bennett & R.L. Fischer, 1989. Expression of a chimericpolygalacturonase gene in transgenicrin (ripening inhibitor) tomatofruit results in polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening. Plant Cell1: 53–63.
Gray, J.E., S.Picton, J. Shabbeer, W. Schuch & D. Grierson, 1992. Molecular biology offruit ripening and its manipulation with antisense genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 69–87.
Gray, J.E., S.Picton & D. Grierson, 1994. The use of transgenic and naturally occurringmutants to understand and manipulate tomato fruit ripening. Plant, Cell &Environ. 17: 557–571.
Grierson, D.,M.J. Maunders, A. Slater, J. Ray, C.R. Bird, W. Schuch, M.J. Holdsworth, G.A.Tucker & J.E. Knapp,1986a.Gene expression during tomato ripening. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314:399–410.
Grierson, D.,G.A. Tucker, J. Keen, J. Ray, C.R. Bird & W. Schuch, 1986b. Sequencing andidentification of a cDNA clone for tomato polygalacturonase. Nucl. Acids Res.14: 8595–8603.
Grierson, D.,M.E. Purton,J.E.Knapp&B. Bathgate, 1987. Tomato ripening mutants. In: H. Thomas & D. Grierson(Eds) Developmental Mutants in Higher Plants, pp. 73–94. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge.
Grierson, D.& W. Schuch, 1993. Control of ripening. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B342,241–250.
Hall, L.N., G.A.Tucker, C.J.S. Smith, C.F. Watson, G.B. Seymour, Y. Bundick, J.M. Boniwell,J.D. Fletcher, J.A. Ray, W. Schuch, C.R. Bird & D. Grierson, 1993.Antisense inhibition of pectinesterase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes.The Plant Journal 3: 121–129.
Hamilton, A.J., G.W. Lycett & D.Grierson, 1990. Antisense gene that inhibits synthesis of the hormone ethylenein transgenic plants. Nature 346: 284–287.
Hamilton, A.J.,M. Bouzayen & D. Grierson, 1991. Identification of a tomato gene for theethylene forming enzyme by expression in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:7434–7437.
Hobson, G.E.,1965. The firmness of tomato fruit in relation to polygalacturonase activity.J. Hort.Sci. 40:66–72.
Holdsworth, M.J.,C.R. Bird, J. Ray, W. Schuch & D. Grierson, 1987. Structure and expressionof an ethylene-related mRNA from tomato. Nucl. Acids.Res. 15: 731–739.
Holdsworth, M.J.,W. Schuch & D. Grierson, 1988. Organisation and expression of awound/ripening-related small multigene family from tomato. Plant Mol. Biol. 11: 81–88.
John, P., 1991.How plant molecular biologists revealed a surprising relationship between twoenzymes, which took an enzyme out of a membrane where it was not located, andput it into the soluble phase where it could be studied. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9: 192–194.
Kramer, M., R.A.Sanders, R.E. Sheehy, M. Melis, M. Kuchn & W.R. Hiatt, 1990. Fieldevaluation of tomatoes with reduced polygalacturonase by antisense RNA. In: A.B. Bennett& S.D. O’Niel (Eds) Horticultural Biotechnology, pp. 347–355. Wiley- Liss,New York.
Kramer, M., R.Sanders, H. Bolkan, C. Waters, R.E. Sheehy & R.W. Hiatt, 1992. Postharvestevaluation of transgenic tomatoes with reduced levels of polygalacturonase:Processing, firmness and disease resistance. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1:241–255.
Lincoln, J.E., S.Cordes,E.Read & R.L. Fischer, 1987. Regulation of gene expression by ethylene duringLycopersicon esculentum (Tomato) fruit development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:2793–2797.
Murray, A.J.,G.E. Hobson, W. Schuch & C.R. Bird, 1993. Reduced ethylene biosynthesis inEFE-antisense tomatoes has differential effects on the ripening process.Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2: 301–313.
Nicholass, F.J.,C.F. Watson, C.J.S. Smith, W. Schuch, C.R. Bird & D. Grierson, 1995. Highlevels of ripening-specific reporter gene expression directed by tomato fruitpolygalacturonase gene flanking regions. Plant Mol. Biol., in press.
Oeller, P.W., L.M. Wong,L.P. Taylor, D.A. Pike & A. Theolo- gis, 1992. Reversible inhibition oftomato fruit senescence by antisense 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylatesynthase. Science 254: 427–439.
Peach, C. &J. Velten,1991.Transgeneexpressionvariability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genesdriven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 49–60.
Peñarrubia, L.,M. Aguilar, L. Margossian & R.L. Fischer, 1992. An antisense genestimulates ethylene hormone production during tomato fruit ripening. Plant Cell4: 681–687.
Picton, S., S.L.Barton, M. Bouzayen, A.J. Hamilton & D. Grierson, 1993a. Altered fruitripening and leaf senescence in tomatoes expressing an antisenseethylene-forming enzyme transgene. The Plant Journal 3: 469–481.
Picton, S., J.E.Gray, S. Barton, U. AbuBaker, A. Lowe & D. Grierson, 1993b. cDNA cloningand characterisation of novel ripening-related mRNAs with altered patterns ofaccumulation in theripening inhibitor (rin) tomato ripening mutant.Plant Mol.Biol.23: 193–207.
Picton, S., J.E.Gray, S. Payton, S. Barton, A. Lowe & D. Grierson, 1993c. A histidinedecarboxylase-like mRNA is involved in tomato fruit ripening. Plant Mol. Biol. 23:627–631.
Picton, S., J.E.Gray & D. Grierson, 1994. Ethylene genes and fruit ripening. In: P.J.Davies (Ed) Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, inpress. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
Ray, J., C. Bird,M. Maunders, D. Grierson & W. Schuch, 1987. Sequence of pTOM 5, a ripeningrelated cDNA from tomato. Nucl. Acids Res. 15: 10587.
Redenbaugh, K.,W. Hiatt, B. Martineau, M. Kramer, R. Sheehy, R. Sanders, C. Houck & D.Emlay, 1991. Safety assessment of genetically engineered fruits and vegetables.A case study of the Flavr Savr™ tomato. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
Schuch, W., G.Hobson, K. Kanczler, G. Tucker, D. Robertson, D. Grierson, S. Bright & C.Bird, 1991. Improvement of tomato fruit quality through genetic engineering.HortScience 26: 1517–1520.
Seymour, G.B.,R.G. Fray, P. Hill & G.A. Tucker, 1993. Down- regulation of twonon-homologous endogenous tomato genes with a single chimeric sense geneconstruct. Plant Mol.Biol. 23: 1–9.
Sheehy, R.E., J.Pearson, C.J. Brady & W.R. Hiatt, 1987. Molecular characterization oftomato fruit polygalacturonase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 208: 30–36.
Sheehy, R.E., M.Crammer & W.R. Hiatt, 1988. Reduction of polygalacturonase activity intomato fruit by antisense RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:8805–8809.
Slater, A., M.J.Maunders, K. Edwards, W. Schuch & D. Grierson, 1985. Isolation andcharacterization of cDNA clones for tomato polygalacturonase and other ripeningrelated proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. 5: 137–147.
Smith, C.J.S., A.Slater & D. Grierson, 1986. Rapid appearance of a mRNA correlated withethylene synthesis encoding a protein of MW 35,000. Planta 168: 94–100.
Smith, C.J.S.,C.F. Watson, J. Ray,C.R.Bird, P.C. Morris, W. Schuch & D. Grierson, 1988. Antisense RNA inhibition ofpolygalacturonase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes. Nature 334: 724–726.
Smith, C.J.S.,C.F. Watson, P.C. Morris, C.R. Bird, G.B. Seymour, J.E. Gray, C. Arnold, G.A.Tucker, W. Schuch, S. Harding & D. Grierson, 1990. Inheritance and effecton ripening of antisense polygalacturonase genes in transgenic tomatoes. Plant Mol. Biol. 14:369–379.
Spanu, P., D. Reinhart & T. Boller,1991. Analysis and cloning of the ethylene-forming enzyme from tomato byfunctional expression of its mRNA inXenopus laevis oocytes. EMBO J. 10:2007–2013.
Tieman, D.M.,R.W. Harriman,G. Ramamohan & A.K. Handa, 1992. An antisense pectinmethylesterase genealters pectin chemistry and soluble solids in tomato fruit. Plant Cell 4:667–679.
van der Krol, A.R., P.E.Lenting, J.Veenstra, I.M. Van der Meer, R.E. Koes, A.G.M. Gerats, J.N.M. Mol & A.R. Stuitje, 1988. An anti-sense chalcone synthase gene in transgenic plantsinhibits flower pigmentation. Nature 333: 866–869.
Yang, S.F. &N.E. Hoffman, 1984. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants.Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35: 155– 189.
Yang, S.F., 1985.Biosynthesis and action of ethylene. HortScience 20: 41–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Picton, S., Gray, J.E., Grierson, D. (1995). The manipulation and modification of tomato fruit ripening by expression of antisense RNA in transgenic plants. In: Cassells, A.C., Jones, P.W. (eds) The Methodology of Plant Genetic Manipulation: Criteria for Decision Making. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0357-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0357-2_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4159-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0357-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive