Skip to main content

The Distinction between Self- and Other-Related Failure Outcome Expectancies: An Internal Domain Study of Indian and Norwegian Students

  • Chapter
The Self in European and North American Culture: Development and Processes

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 84))

Abstract

Inspired by the worry — emotionality distinction suggested by (1967), much research in test anxiety has emphasized the importance of self-related cognitions. In fact self-related cognitions seem to have been the focus of test anxiety research since the introduction of the worry construct in late 60’s and early 70’s. Sarason is one of those who have most thoroughly explicated this view. (1975b) stated that “Perhaps anxiety, while important, is not quite so pivotal. Perhaps the more basic process is not anxiety, but self-preoccupation or self-focusing.” (p. 35). The self-related cognitions concept has been incorporated later in the framework of trait-state anxiety theory (Spielberger, Anton, & Bedell, 1976; Spielberger, Gonzales, Taylor, Algaze, & Anton, 1978) in terms of the worry component of the trait test anxiety construct. The self-focusing aspect of worry has been considered to be a key construct in a cognitiveattentional approach to test anxiety (Sarason, 1972, 1975a, 1975b; Wine, 1971, 1980). (1987) are among those who have most strongly emphasized the notion of self-focus. (1992) stated that self-related thoughts are seen as a necessary ingredient of the anxiety experience (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1992). Recently self-related cognitions have entered an integrated theory of achievement anxiety from a self-worth perspective, which emphasizes the notion of anxiety as a failure-of-self (Covington, 1992). In spite of the emphasis that is put on the self-related cognitions, these cognitions are not fully understood with respect to their nature and measurement and how they may be related to academic performance. This implies that what types of self-related thoughts that are supposed to be measured by instruments of worry remained rather unelaborated. This state of affairs suggests that how individualand group differences in test anxiety mirror self-related cognitions still remains an open question. A reasonable point of departure to scrutinize this problem would be to examine measures of worry as well as emotionality with respect to the extent and type of selfrelated cognitions they may be measuring.

This study was supported by research grants provided by Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway. The authors would like to acknowledge stud. psychol. Birthe K. Engelsen for her assistance in collecting data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, J.W. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.W. (1974). The mainsprings of achievement-oriented activity. In J.W. Atkinson, & J.O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and Achievement (pp. 13–41). Washington, D.C.: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J., & Hagtvet, K.A. (in press). The interplay among design, data analysis, and theory in the measurement of coping. In N.S. Endler and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J., Moulin-Julian, M., Schwarzer, C., Seipp, B., & El-Zahhar, N. (1992). Cross-validation of a revised test anxiety scale using multi-national samples. In K.A. Hagtvet, & T.B. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances of Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 7, pp. 332–343). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakar, R.M., & Rommetveit, R. (1975). Utterances in vacuo and in contexts: An experimental and theoretical exploration of some interrelationships between what is heard and what is seen or imagined. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 4, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R.L., (1992). Elements of Generalizability Theory. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B.J. (1994). Effects of culture, gender, and age on the structure and the level of trait test anxiety: An integrative research review of the Test Anxiety Inventory. Manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A.H. (1980). Self-Consciousness and Social Anxiety. Oxford: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A.H. (1986). Two kinds of shyness. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation (pp. 65–75). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1986). Functional and dysfunctional responses to anxiety: The interaction between expectancies and self-focused attention. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation (pp. 111–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Klahr, D. (1987). Further explorations of a control-process model of test anxiety. In R. Schwarzer, H.M. v.d. Ploeg, & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 5, pp. 15–22). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (1966). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In R.B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (pp. 174–243). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M.V. (1992). Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M.F., & Buss, A.H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 43, 522–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, G.M., Jackson, D.M., Astilla, E., & Elwood, B. (1983). Personality measurement: Do the scales have similar meanings in another culture? In S.H. Irvine and J.W. Berry (Eds.), Human Assessments and Cultural Factors (pp. 377–392). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet, K.A. (1978). Components of test anxiety measured in and out of explicitly defined situational contexts. Psychological Reports, 40, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet, K.H. (1989). The Construct of Test Anxiety: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Bergen/London: Sigma Forlag/Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet, K.A. (1993). Analyzing data from structured measurement designs: Links between correlationally-oriented analysis of variance, covariance modeling, and generalizability theory. Invited address: Department of Educational Psychology, Research and Measurement, College of Education, The University of Georgia, Athens, USA, January 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagtvet, K.A., & Undheim, J.O. (1988). The Norwegian experience of test use: A selective review of Norwegian tests and measurement in a cultural context. In S.H. Irvine, & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Human Abilities in Cultural Contexts (pp. 263–281). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C.W., & Kaiser, H.F. (1964). Oblique factor analytic solutions by orthogonal transformations. Psychometrika, 29, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D., & El-Zahhar, N. (1992). Cross-cultural differences in test anxiety: Establishing transliteral equivalence. In K.A. Hagtvet, & T.B. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances of Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 7, pp. 103–113). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodapp, V. (1989). Anxiety, fear of failure, and achievement: Two path-analytic models. Anxiety Research, 2, 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodapp, V. (1991). Das Prüfungsängstlichkeitsinventar TAI-G: Eine erweiterte und modifizierte Version mit vier Komponenten. [The Test Anxiety Inventory TAI-G: An extended and modified version with four components]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 5, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodapp, V. (1992). Achievement, stress, and test anxiety: A validation study of the TAI-G. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference of the Stress and Anxiety Research Society. Leuven, July 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, S.H., & Berry, J.W. (1988). The abilities of mankind: A revaluation. In S.H. Irvine, & J.W. Berry (Eds.). Human Abilities in Cultural Contexts (pp. 1–59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jerusalem, M. (1985). A longitudinal field study with trait worry and trait emotionality: Methodological problems. In H.M. van der Ploeg, R. Schwarzer, & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 4, pp. 23–34). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakkar, S. (1982). Shamans, Mystics and Doctors: A Psychological Enquiry into India and its healing traditions. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, R.M., & Morris, L.W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological Reports, 20, 975–978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Losiak, W. (1992). Polish adaptation of Spielberger’s Test Anxiety Inventory. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference of the Stress and Anxiety Research Society. Leuven, July 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Man, F., Stuchlik, L., & Hagtvet, K.A. (1992). The effects of cognitive interference and experimentally manipulated failure on information processing in a complex strategic game. In K.A. Hagtvet, & T.B. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances of Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 7, pp. 332–343). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.G. (1994s). Cultural diversity in the morsality of caring: Individually oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codes. Cross-Cultural Research, 28, 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (1984). An expectancy-value model of anxiety. In H.M. van der Ploeg, R. Schwarzer, & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.). Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 3, pp. 53–72). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (1990). Social support, achievement evaluations, and self-concepts in adolescence. In L. Oppenheimer (Ed.), The Self-Concept.: European Perspectives on its Development, Aspects, and Applications (pp. 107–120). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y.H. (1983). Psychometric approaches to intergroup comparison: The problem of equivalence. In S.H. Irvine, & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Human Assessment and Cultural Factors (pp. 237–257). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A.R., & Woolever, D.K. (1988). Expectancy and self-focused attention: Experimental support for the self-regulation model of test anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rommetveit, R. (1974). On Message Structure. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R., & Srivastava, R.K. (1986). Dialogues on Development. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I.G. (1972). Experimental approaches to test anxiety: Attention and the uses of information. In C.D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 381–403). New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I.G. (1975a). Test anxiety, attention and the general problem of anxiety. In C.D. Spielberger, & I.G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and Anxiety (Vol. 1, pp. 165–187). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I.G. (1975b). Anxiety and self-preoccupation. In I.G. Sarason, & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and Anxiety (Vol. 2, pp. 27–44). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason. I.G. (1986). Test anxiety, worry, and cognitive interference. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation (pp. 19–33). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S.B., Davidson, K.S., Lighthall, F.F., Waite, R.R., & Ruebush, B.K. (1960). Anxiety in Elementary School Children: A Report of Research. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. (1984). Worry and emotionality as separate components in test anxiety. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. (1986). Self-related cognitions in anxiety and motivation: An introduction. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.). Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1992). Advances in anxiety theory: A cognitive process approach. In K.A. Hagtvet and T.B. Johnsen (Ed.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 7, pp. 2–17). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Quast, H.H. (1985). Multidimensionality of the anxiety experience: Evidence for additional components. In H.M. van der Ploeg, R. Schwarzer, & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.). Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 4, pp. 3–14). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J.B.P. (1981). The Hindu (Indian) Identity. Paper presented at the XIII Internationalen Symposium der Deutschen Akademie für Psychoanalyse (DAP), 11–16, Dezember, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C.D. (1980). Test Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C.D., Anton, W.D., & Bedell, J. (1976). The nature and treatment of test anxiety. In M. Zuckerman, & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Emotions and Anxiety: New Concepts, Methods, and Applications (pp. 317–345). New York, NY: Erlbaum /Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C.D., Gonzales, H.P., Taylor, C.J., Algaze, B., & Anton, W.D. (1978). Examination stress and test anxiety. In C.D. Spielberger and I.G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and Anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 167–191). New York, NY: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C.D., & Vagg, P.R. (1987). The treatment of test anxiety: A transactional process model. In R. Schwarzer, H.M. van der Ploeg, & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 5, pp. 179–186). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, R.G. (1988). Aligning development to values in India. In D. Sinha, & H.S.R. Kao (Eds.), Social Values and Development: Asian Perspectives (pp. 315–333). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J.D. (1971). Test Anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 92–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J.D. (1980). Cognitive attentional theory of test anxiety. In I.G. Sarason (Ed.), Test Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 349–385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., & Nevo, B. (1992). Test anxiety in examinees in a college admission testing situation: Incidence, dimensionality, and cognitive correlates. In K.A. Hagtvet, & T.B. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances of Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 7, pp. 288–303). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, J., Hocevar, D., Bachelor, P., & Meinke, D.L. (1992). An analysis of the Sarason (1984) four-factor conceptualization of test anxiety. In K.A. Hagtvet, & T.B. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances of Test Anxiety Research (Vol. 7, pp. 103–113). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hagtvet, K.A., Sharma, S. (1995). The Distinction between Self- and Other-Related Failure Outcome Expectancies: An Internal Domain Study of Indian and Norwegian Students. In: Oosterwegel, A., Wicklund, R.A. (eds) The Self in European and North American Culture: Development and Processes. NATO ASI Series, vol 84. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0331-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0331-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4146-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0331-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics