Abstract
Fundamental aspects of hydropyrolysis in terms of how both reaction conditions and reactor geometry affect product yields and compositions are reviewed, followed by a description of the pressurised fluidised-bed hydroretorting (PFH) process developed at the Institute of Gas Technology (IGT) as an example of an oil shale hydroretorting process that has been successfully operated on a PDU scale. The use of low temperatures and long solids residence times in well-swept fixed-and fluidised-bed reactors are essential to achieve high selectivity to liquid products in hydropyrolysis. For oil shales, hydrogen pressures of ca 5–10 MPa are generally sufficient to approach the maximum ecomomical oil yield compared to those of over 30 MPa for coals, unless suitable dispersed catalysts are used. Hydropyrolysis oils generally more aromatic with lower heteroatom contents with increasing hydrogen pressure. The PFH process developed at IGT has been scaled-up from a 100 g batch unit to a 100 kg hr-1 semi-continous PDU. To assess the potential oil yields from PFH, a hydroretorting assay unit was used extensively . Compared to Western U.S. (Eocene, Type I kerogen) oil shales, which give high oil yields in conventional retorting processes, Eastern Devonian shales (Type II kerogens) have considerably lower atomic H/C ratios which severely restricts the attainable oil yields. In hydretorting at 538°C and 6.9 MPa, the oil yields from Eastern U.S. shales were substantially improved and usually doubled using the PFH process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G.R. Gavalas, Coal Pyrolysis, Elsevier (1985).
S.K. Chakrabartty and M.P. du Plessis, Modern Coal Pyrolysis; Information Series 95, Alberta Research Council, Canada (1985) and references therein.
S. Furfari, IEA Report No. ICTIS/TR20 (1983) and references therein.
E. Ekinci, A.E. Putun, M. Citiroglu, C.J. Lafferty and C.E. Snape, Proc. 1991 Int. Conf. on Coal Science (Newcastle). 520 and M. Citiroglu, Ph.D thesis, Istanbul Technical University (1993).
M.J. Roberts, D. Rue and F. Lau, Fuel, 1992, 71, 1433.
G. Fynes, W.R. Ladner and J.O.H. Newman, Fuel. 1980, 59, 397.
C. Bolton, C. Riemer, C.E. Snape, R.J. O’Brien and R. Kandiyoti, Fuel. 1987, 66, 1413.
H. Juntgen, Fuel. 1984, 63, 731 and references therein.
E.M. Suuberg, W.A. Peters and J.B. Howard, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Pes. Dev., 1978, 17, 37.
P. Arendt and K.-H. van Heek, Fuel, 1981, 60, 779.
J.B. Howard in Chemistry of Coal Utilisation 2nd. Supp. Vol.. (Ed. M.A. Elliott), J.Wiley, 1981, p 655.
P.T. Fallon, B. Bhatt and M. Steinberg, Fuel Process. Technol., 1980, 3, 155.
C.E. Snape, W.R. Ladner and K.D. Bartle, Fuel, 1985, 64, 1394.
C.E. Snape, C.J. Lafferty, S. Mitchell, F. Donald and C. McArthur, G. Eglinton, N. Robinson and R. Collier, Final report on EC Contract No. EN3V -0048 -UK (H), October 1991.
N. Robinson, G. Eglinton, C.J. Lafferty and C.E. Snape, Fuel. 1991, 70, 249.
R.E. Wood and W.H. Wiser, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Pes. Dev., 1976, 15(1), 144.
J.R. Kershaw, G. Barass and D. Grady, Fuel Process Technol., 1980, 3, 115.
C. Bolton, C. Riemer, C.E. Snape, F.J. Derbyshire and M.T. Terrer, Fuel. 1988, 67, 901.
C.E. Snape, C. Bolton, R.G. Dosch and H.P. Stephens, Energy & Fuels. 1989,3, 421
C.E. Snape, C. Bolton, R.G. Dosch and H.P. Stephens Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem., 1988, 33(3), 251.
D. Garg and E.N. Givens, Prepr. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem., 1983, 28(5), 200.
J.A. Ruether, J.A. Mima, R.M. Kornosky and B.C. Ha, Energy & Fuels. 1987, 1(2), 198.
C.W. Curtis and J.L. Pelligrino, Energy & Fuels. 1989, 3(2), 160.
C.E. Snape, C.J. Lafferty, H.P. Stephens, R.G. Dosch and E. Klavetter, Fuel. 1991, 70, 393.
D.K. Sharma, A. Sulimma and K.H. van Heek, Fusl, 1986, 65, 1571.
C. Braekman-Danheux, R. Cypres, A. Fontana, P. Laurent and M. Van Hoegaerden, Fuel, 1992, 71, 251.
C. Bolton, C.E. Snape and H.P. Stephens, Fuel,1989, 68, 161 and references therein.
S.D. Carter, M. Citiroglu, J. Gallacher, C.E. Snape, S.C. Mitchell and C.J. Lafferty, Proc. 1992 Eastern US Oil Shale Symp., Univ. of Kentucky and Fuel. 1994, 73, 1455.
D.V. Punwani, Presented at 12th Energy Technology Conference & Exposition, Washington, D.C., 24–26 March, 1985.
. S.A. Weil et al, Presented at Synthetic Fuels from Oil Shale II, Nashville,Tennessee, 26–29 October 1981.
M.J. Roberts et al, Proc. 1989 Eastern US Oil Shale Symp., pp 487–498, Univ. of Kentucky.
F.S. Lau and D.V. Punwani, Presented at US DoE Oil Shale Contractors meeting, 19–21 My 1988.
M.J. Roberts et al, Final Report on US DoE Contracts DE-AC21-87MC11089 (4 volumes) and Reports on US DoE Contract DOE/MC/11089-47 to 50 (March 1992).
M.J. Roberts et al, Final Report on US DoE Contract DOE/MC/11089-68 (June 1991-May 1992).
M.J. Roberts et al, Final Report on US DoE Contract DOE/MC/11089-79 (June 1992-January 1993).
P.A. Lynch et al, Prepr. Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Pet. Chem., 1984, 29(1), 71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, M.J., Snape, C.E., Mitchell, S.C. (1995). Hydropyrolysis: Fundamentals, Two-Stage Processing and PDU Operation. In: Snape, C. (eds) Composition, Geochemistry and Conversion of Oil Shales. NATO ASI Series, vol 455. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0317-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0317-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4140-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0317-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive