Abstract
It is a common observation that the considerable effort invested in historical and philosophical study of the work of James Clerk Maxwell in electromagnetic theory has not been handsomely repaid: the effort seems not to have been cumulative, generating rather more questions than answers. Characteristically, trenchantly — and perhaps a bit extravagantly — Paul Forman has “described the [Maxwell] enterprise as a vortex in a draining sink that continually sweeps in new intellects and new ideas, which just as continually vanish.”1 (The allusion is to Maxwell’s vortex theory of electricity and magnetism;2 I shall have more to say both about allusions in various kinds of discourse and about Maxwell’s vortex theory.)
Department of the History of Science, Helen C. White Hall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706. An early form of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the History of Science Society, Seattle, October 1990.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siegel, D.M. (1995). Text and Context in Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Theory. In: Kox, A.J., Siegel, D.M. (eds) No Truth Except in the Details. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 167. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0217-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0217-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4097-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0217-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive