Advertisement

Equity in the Mathematics Classroom: Beyond the Rhetoric

Chapter
  • 93 Downloads
Part of the Science & Technology Education Library book series (volume 2)

Abstract

(T)he Australian colonies were among the earliest to emancipate women politically, to offer girls equal educational opportunities, and along with other pioneering societies of the American and Canadian West, and New Zealand, they were seen as promoting female behaviour and personality which allowed assertiveness, friendliness and independence. (Grimshaw, 1982, p. 3)

Keywords

Mathematics Classroom Mathematics Class Mathematics Lesson Australian Council Favourite Subject 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Council for Educational Research (1977). Operations test, Melbourne, Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  2. Brophy, J. & Good, T. (1970). ‘Teacher-child dyadic interaction: A manual for coding classroom behavior’, in A. Simon and E. Boyer (eds.), Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (1970 supplement Vol. A), Philadelphia, PA, Research for Better Schools, 83.2-1-83.2–103.Google Scholar
  3. Eccles, J.S. & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). ‘Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter?’, in L.C. Wilkinson and C.B. Marrett (eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction, New York, Academic Press, 79–114.Google Scholar
  4. Grimshaw, P. (1982). ‘Introduction’, in P. Grimshaw and L. Strahan (eds.), The half open door, Sydney, Marie and Iremonger, 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. Harris, M.J. & Rosenthal, R. (1985). ‘Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta analyses’, Psychological Bulletin (97), 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Leder, G.C. (1986, April). Gender linked differences in mathematics learning: Further explorations, paper presented at the Research Presession to the 64th annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Leder, G.C. (1987). ‘Teacher-student interaction: A case study’, Educational Studies in Mathematics (18), 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leder, G.G. (1988). ‘Teacher-student interactions: The mathematics classroom’, Unicorn (14), 161–166.Google Scholar
  9. Leder, G.C. (1989). ‘Gender differences in mathematics learning revisited’, in G. Vergnand, J. Rogalski and M. Astique (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2), Paris, GRD, dactique CNRS, 218–225.Google Scholar
  10. Leder, G.C. (1992). ‘Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives’, in D.A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, New York, Macmillan, 597–622.Google Scholar
  11. Leder, G.C. (1993). ‘Teacher-student interactions, mathematics, and gender’, in E. Fennema and G.C. Leder (eds.), Mathematics and gender, Brisbane, University of Queensland Press, 149–168.Google Scholar
  12. Leder, G.C. & Fennema, E. (1993). ‘Gender differences in mathematics: A synthesis’, in E. Fennema and G.C. Leder (eds.), Mathematics and gender, Brisbane, University of Queensland Press, 188–199.Google Scholar
  13. Leder, G.C. & Gunstone, R.F. (1990). ‘Perspectives on mathematics learning’, International Journal of Educational Research (14), 105–120.Google Scholar
  14. Leder, G.C., Taylor, P.J. & Fullarton, S. (1994). ‘Australian mathematics competition questionnaire’, work in progress, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
  15. Leinhardt, G. & Putnam, R.T. (1987). ‘The skill of learning from classroom lessons’, American Educational Research Journal (24), 557–587.Google Scholar
  16. Romberg, T.A. (1988 November). Principles for an elementary mathematics program for the 1990s, Revised paper prepared for the California Invitational Symposium in Elementary Mathematics Education, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Rowe, M.B. (1974a). ‘Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables that influence language, logic, and fate control, part one: Wait-time’, Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching(11), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rowe, M.B. (1974b). ‘Relation of wait-time and rewards to the development of language, topic, and fate control, part II: Rewards’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching (11), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sampson, S.N. (1989). ‘Introduction’, in G.C. Leder and S.N. Sampson (eds.), Educating girls: Practice and research, Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1–11.Google Scholar
  20. Steffe, L.P. & Cobb, P. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies, New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.La Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations