Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is twofold. First, we present a cross-national comparison of the implementation of a gender equity initiative in Australia and the USA. Second, we provide an example of the ways in which both teaching and research in science education can be informed through the development and implementation of gender equity initiatives. The chapter documents the stages in a collaborative and evolving process involving two almost identical studies, one in Australia and one in the USA, and uses the combined results of the two studies in developing an explanatory model of the relationship between gender and science in schools and classrooms. Both studies used inservice workshops not only to address primary school teachers’ lack of background knowledge and skill in teaching physical science, but also to give them training in gender-equitable teaching strategies. Both interventions were monitored and evaluated in terms of student and teacher attitudes, beliefs and behaviours in relation to science.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bailey, B. (1992). ‘The effect of teacher inservice on students’ attitude and participation’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oxford, Ohio, Miami University.
Kahle, J.B., Anderson, A. & Damnjanovic, A. (1991). ‘A comparison of elementary teacher attitudes and skills in teaching science in Australia and the United States’, Research in Science Education (21), 208–216.
Kahle, J.B. & Damnjanovic, A. (1994). ‘The effect of inquiry activities on elementary students’ enjoyment, ease and confidence in doing science: An analysis by sex and race’, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering (1), 17–28.
Kahle, J.B., Parker, L.H., Rennie, L.J. & Riley, D. (1993). ‘Gender differences in science education: Building a model’, Educational Psychologist (28), 379–404.
Kahle, J.B. & Rennie, L.J. (1993). ‘Ameliorating gender differences in attitudes about science: A cross-national study’, Journal of Science Education and Technology (2), 321–333.
Kelly, A. (1978). Girls and science, IEA Monograph Studies No. 6, Stockholm, Almqvist & Wicksell.
Kelly, A (1981). The missing half: Girls and science education, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Linn, M.C. & Hyde, J.S. (1989). ‘Gender, mathematics and science’, Educational Researcher 18(8), 17–19, 22-27.
McMillan, J.H. & May, M. (1979). ‘A study of the factors influencing attitudes towards science of junior high school students’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching (16), 217–222.
Ormerod, M.B. & Duckworth, D. (1975). Pupils’ attitudes to science: A review of research, Slough, National Foundation for Educational Research.
Parker, L.H. & Rennie, L.J. (1985). ‘Teacher inservice as an avenue to equality in science and technology education’, Contributions to the Third GASAT Conference, London, Chelsea College, University of London, 226–234.
Parker, L.H. & Rennie, L.J. (1986). ‘Sex-stereotyped attitudes about science: Can they be changed?’, European Journal of Science Education (8), 173–183.
Rennie, L.J. & Parker, L.H. (1987). ‘Detecting and accounting for gender differences in mixed-sex and single-sex groupings in science lessons’, Educational Review (39), 65–73.
Rennie, L.J., Parker, L.H. & Hutchinson, P. (1985). The effect of inservice training on teacher attitudes and primary school science classroom climate (Report to the Commonwealth Schools Commission), Perth, The University of Western Australia.
Shrigley, R.L. (1983). ‘Persuade, mandate and reward: A paradigm for changing the science attitudes and behaviours of teachers’, School Science and Mathematics (83), 204–215.
Simpson, R.D. (1978). ‘Relating student feelings to achievement in science’, in M.B. Rowe (ed.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 1), Washington, DC, National Science Teachers’ Association.
Stevenson, H.W. & Stigler, J.W. (1992). The learning gap, New York, Summit Books.
Vockell, E.L. & Lobonc, S. (1981). ‘Sex role stereotyping by high school females in science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching (18), 209–219.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rennie, L.J., Parker, L.H., Kahle, J.B. (1996). Informing Teaching and Research in Science Education Through Gender Equity Initiatives. In: Parker, L.H., Rennie, L.J., Fraser, B.J. (eds) Gender, Science and Mathematics. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0143-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0143-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3582-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0143-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive