Skip to main content

Citizens’ Advisory Committee as a Model for Public Participation: A Multiple-Criteria Evaluation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 10))

Abstract

Public involvement in environmental decisions in Western democracies has continuously increased in recent decades. There has been a growing demand for evaluating and comparing public participation processes. Webler (this volume) developed a set of evaluation criteria for fair and competent discourse where fairness is defined as the sufficiency of opportunities that affected citizens have to protect their interests, and competence is related to the adequacy of knowledge selection tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Gloria, Final Report to US Ecology on the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Site Selection Citizens Advisory Committee (Sacramento, California, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, Audrey, Opting for Cooperation: An Innovative Approach to Facility Siting. Manuscript (York University: North York, Ontario, Canada, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Jane L., Opportunities for Public Involvement in Environmental Policy Making Unpublished Manuscript (Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe: Budapest, Hungary, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Ned, “American Citizen Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions,” (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, Peter and Renn, Ortwin, “Planning Cells: A Gate to Fractal Mediation,” (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Law Institute, Public Participation in Environmental Regulation, Draft Working Paper, (Washington, D.C., 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Arie Y., and John W. Minton, “Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research,” Management Science 32(5): 514–538 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Frances M., and Jack D. Kartez, “The Redemption of Citizen Advisory Committees: A Perspective from Critical Theory” (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Midden, Caes, “Direct Participation in Macro-Issues: A Multiple Group Approach: An Analysis and Critique of the Dutch National Debate on Energy Policy, Fairness, Competence, and Beyond” (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumpower, Jeryl L., “The Dutch Study Groups Revisited,” (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkova, Elena, “Public Participation: Opportunities and Constraints: The Case of the Troyan Environmental Action Project,” in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: A Challenge for Central and Eastern Europe (Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe: Budapest, Hungary, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lawrence D., “Requisite Decision Modeling: A Case Study.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33: 303–311 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lawrence D., “A Theory of Requisite Decision Models.” Acta Psychologica, 56: 29–48 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Robert E., Beyond Rational Management (Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA,1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Robert E., and John W. Rohrbaugh, “A Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis.” Public Productivity Review, 5: 141–159 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Robert E., and John W. Rohrbaugh, “A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Effectiveness.” Management Science, 29: 363–377 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, Patricia, and John W. Rohrbaugh, “Group Decision Process Effectiveness: A Competing Values Approach.” Group and Organizational Studies, 15(1): 20–43 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh, John W., “Assessing the Effectiveness of Expert Teams,” in: Jeryl L. Mumpower, Lawrence D. Phillips, Ortwin Renn, and V.R.R. Uppuluri (eds.), Expert Judgment and Expert Systems. (Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Authority, Report to the Public on the Site Selection Process and Other Analyses (Austin, Texas, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vari, Anna, “Approaches Towards Conflict Resolution in Decision Processes,” in: Charles Vlek and George Cvetkovich (eds), Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 79–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vari, Anna, Jeryl L. Mumpower, and Patricia Reagan-Cirincione, Planning for the Management of Low-Level Radioactive Waste in New York State: A Case Study. Research Report (Center for Policy Research, State University of New York at Albany: Albany, NY, 1993/a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vari, Anna, Jeryl L. Mumpower, and Patricia Reagan-Cirincione, Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility Siting Processes in the United States, Western Europe, and Canada. Research Report (Center for Policy Research, State University of New York at Albany: Albany, NY, 1993/b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasarhelyi, Judit, and Susanna Mcllwane, “Collaborative Environmental Planning on the Community Level: An Adaptation of the Comparative Risk Model in Two Hungarian Communities,” in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: A Challenge for Central and Eastern Europe (Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe: Budapest, Hungary, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webler, Thomas, “‘Right’ Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick”, (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vari, A. (1995). Citizens’ Advisory Committee as a Model for Public Participation: A Multiple-Criteria Evaluation. In: Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3518-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0131-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics