Abstract
Environmental conflict is frequently bome of differences in individual and group values. Other important contributors to conflict include contrasting beliefs and differences in the distribution of costs and benefits. Societal choices made in an attempt to fulfill human needs and wants can eventually produce unanticipated outcomes, exposures, and undesirable consequences. The severity of these effects are often highly disputed by the scientific community and interpreted over widely varying measures of significance by affected parties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bingham, Gail, “Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience,” in: Robert W. Lake (ed.), Resolving Locational Conflict (Center For Urban Policy Research, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey, 1987), pp. 314–323.
Cormick, Gerald W., “The Myth, the Reality, and the Future of Environmental Mediation,” in Robert W. Lake (ed.), Resolving Locational Conflict (Center For Urban Policy Research, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey, 1987), pp. 302–313.
Dryzek, John S., and Susan Hunter, “Environmental Mediation for International Problems,” International Studies Quarterly 31:87–102 (1987).
Fisher, R., and W. Ury, Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Houghton Mifflin: Boston 1981).
Pruitt, Dean G., and Kenneth Kressel, “The Mediation of Social Conflict: An Introduction,” Journal of Social Issues 41(2):1–10 (1985).
Stephenson, Max O., Jr., and Gerald M. Pops, “Conflict Resolution Methods and the Policy Process,” Public Administration Review 3: 463–473 (September/October 1989).
Raiffa, Howard, The Art and Science of Negotiation (Cambridge: Belknap 1982).
Stulberg, “The Theory and Practice of Mediation: A Reply to Professor Susskind,” Vermont Law Review (6): 85–88 (1981).
Susskind, Lawrence, and Connie Ozawa, “Mediating Public Disputes: Obstacles and Possibilities,” Journal of Social Issues (41)2: 145–159 (1985).
Susskind, Lawrence, and Jefferey Cruikshank, Breaking The Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes (Basic Books: New York 1987).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baughman, M. (1995). Mediation. In: Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3518-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0131-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive