Skip to main content

Aggregating economic knowledge for use at national, regional, sector, and farm level

  • Chapter
Eco-regional approaches for sustainable land use and food production

Part of the book series: Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development ((SAAD,volume 4))

Abstract

Decisions concerning land use, agricultural production and environmental management are taken at many different levels, ranging from the national to the farm level. For proper decision making, policy makers at each level should dispose of relevant, reliable and consistent information. National or regional policy makers require information on what happens at farm or regional level. Can such information be supplied by aggregating farm level knowledge into sector, regional or national models? The author explores this question in three steps.

First the methodological issues in aggregation of knowledge are discussed. Aggregation problems for individual data, response functions and systems models are described and conditions for correct aggregation are formulated. Spatial and temporal aggregation is discussed and juxtaposed with the exploration and analysis of disaggregated data. Five frequently occurring aggregation biases are discussed.

Secondly the use of knowledge by policy makers is treated. Different levels of policy making and their specific requirements are distinguished. Problems of integrating farmers and policy makers perspectives are reviewed. Political and agro-ecological boundaries for aggregation purposes are compared and the friction between more detailed model specification and the user perspective is explored.

Finally six suggestions for improving the integration of policy making and (dis)aggregated analysis are made: early interactions between policy makers and analysts; more empirical studies on policy making; a shift from theory development to empirical application; the adoption of participatory action research elements in agro-ecological research; a focus on interventions instead of (eco)systems; and the integration of disciplines along the different hierarchical levels.

The author has received useful suggestions for literature search and has benefitted from discussions with Sjoerd Duiker, Louise Fresco, Peter Goldsworthy, Larry Harrington, Peter Jones, Arie Kuyvenhoven, Jean Francois Merlet, Roger Norton and Steve Vosti. Their help is greatly appreciated. Some of the comments made by Roger Norton during the symposium have been incorporated in the final version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alfaro R, Bouma J, Fresco L O, Jansen D M, Kroonenberg, S B, Van Leeuwen A C J, Schipper R A, Sevenhuysen R J, Stoorvogel, J J, Watsen, V (1994) Sustainable land use planning in Costa Rica: a methodological case study on farm and regional level. Pages 183–202 in Fresco L O, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, Van Keulen H (Eds.) The future of the land: mobilizing and integrating knowledge for land use options. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen W, Fresco L O, Van Duivenbooden N, Windmeijer P N (1994) Multi-scale characterization of inland valley agro-ecosystems in West Africa. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 42:159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle J M (1983) Sequential decision making in production models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65:282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt H W (1993) Sustainable development and the discount rate. Economic Development and Cultural Change 1993:651–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter S E (1988) The design of crop specific micro regions and their contribution to agricultural research and rural development initiatives in South America: the case of cassava. PhD dissertation. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter S E, Jones P (1990) A model of cassava distribution in Africa. In Janssen W. (Ed.) Trends in CIAT commodities 1990. CIAT working document no. 74. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter S E, Bradley, P N, Franzel, S, Lynam J K (1994) Dealing with spatial variation in research for natural resource management, mimeo, TSBF-Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaño J (1994) Market system effects on the sustainability of agricultural systems in Andean hillsides. PhD research proposal, Dept. of Marketing and Market Research, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosson P, Anderson J (1993) Concerns for sustainability. ISNAR Research report no. 4. International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day R H (1963) On aggregating linear programming models of production. Journal of Farm Economics 45:797–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent J B, Blackie M J (1979) Systems simulation in agriculture. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco L O (1994) Planning for the people and the land of the future. Pages 395–398 in Fresco L O, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, Van Keulen H (Eds.) The future of the land: mobilizing and integrating knowledge for land use options. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresco L O, Huizing H, Van Keulen H, Luning H A, Schipper R A (1992) Land evaluation and fanning systems analysis for land use planning. FAO working document. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresco L O, Kroonenberg S B (1992) Time and spatial scales in ecological sustainability. Land Use Policy, July 1992:155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin G (1992) Science, technology and the ecological future of Latin America. World Development 20:1391–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle M, Thomas J (1991) Public Choices and Policy Change. John Hopkins, Baltimore ML, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington L, Ashby J (forthcoming) Research strategies for Natural Resource Management. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F. and CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell P B R (1993) New challenges for resource and environment data for policy research. In Von Braun J, Puetz D (Eds.). Data needs for food policy in developing countries: new directions for household surveys. Occasional Paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell P B R, Norton R D (1986) Mathematical programming for economic analysis in agriculture. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks J R (1946) Value and Capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izac A-M N, Palm C, Vosti S (1993) Procedural guidelines for characterization and diagnosis: alternatives to slash and burn project. Mimeo, International Centre for Research in Agroforesty (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen W G (1986) Market impact on cassava&s development potential in the Atlantic Coast region of Colombia. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen W G (1993) An analysis of the decision process in agricultural research. Paper presented at the ISNAR-EDI seminar on structural adjustment and agricultural research. Nairobi, Kenya, March 21-26, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen W G, Goldsworthy P (1994) Multidisciplinary research programs: What, why and how? mimeograph. International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P G, Robison D M, Carter S E (1991) A GIS approach to identifying research problems and opportunities in natural resource management. In: CIAT in the 1990s and beyond: a strategic plan, supplement. CIAT publication no. 198. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARI (1994) Priority setting into the 21st century: a position paper by the priority setting working group. Discussion paper. KARI, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropff M J, Penning de Vries F W T, Teng P S (1994) Capacity building and human resource development for applying systems analysis in rice research. Pages 323–339 in Goldsworthy P, Penning de Vries F W T (Eds.) Opportunities, use and transfer of systems research methods in agriculture to developing countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewbel A (1994) Aggregation and simple dynamics. American Economic Review, 1994:905–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynam J K, Janssen W (1992) Commodity research programs from the demand side. Agricultural Systems 39:231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynam J K (1994a) Integrating research planning, priority setting and input evaluation within the CGIAR. In Collinson M P, Wright Platais K (Eds.) Social science in the CGIAR. CGIAR Study paper no. 28, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynam J K (1994b) Sustainable growth in agricultural production: the links between production, resources, and research. Pages 3–27 in Goldsworthy P, Penning de Vries F W T (Eds.) Opportunities, use and transfer of systems research methods in agriculture to developing countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Monke E A, Pearson S R (1989) The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Cornell University Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson J A (1991) Quality variation and quantity aggregation in consumer demand for food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73:1204–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton R D (1995) Comments on: “Aggregating economic knowledge for use at national, regional, sector and farm level” (pages 333–351 in this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce D W, Barbier E, Markandya A (1990) Sustainable development: economics and environment in the third world. Edgar Algar, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinstrup-Andersen P (1993) Policy issues and problems of data collection. In Von Braun J, Puetz D (Eds.) Data needs for food policy in developing countries: new directions for household surveys. Occasional Paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg J D (1990) Labor, markets and agricultural production. Westview Press, Boulder CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbinge R, Van Ittersum M K (1994) Tension between aggregation levels. Pages 31–40 in Fresco L O, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, Van Keulen H (Eds.) The future of the land: mobilizing and integrating knowledge for land use options. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae A N (1977) Crop management economics. Granada Publishing, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling N (1994) Platforms for decision making about ecosystems. Pages 385–393 in Fresco L O, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, Van Keulen H (Eds.) The future of the land: mobilizing and integrating knowledge for land use options. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper R A, Jansen HGP, Stoorvogel J J, Jansen D M (1995). Evaluating policies for sustainable land use: a sub-regional model with farm types in Costa Rica (pages 377–395 in this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stomph T J, Fresco L O, Van Keulen H (1994). Land use system evaluation: concepts and methodology. Agricultural Systems 44:243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil H (1954) Linear aggregation of economic relations. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp R, Buckles D, Van Nieuwkoop M, Harrington L (1993) Land classification, land economics and technical change: awkward issues in farmer adoption of land-conserving technologies. Paper presented at: “Seminario/taller internacional para la definicion de una metodologia de evaluacion de tierras para una agriculture sostenible en Mexico. El Batan, Mexico, August 10-13, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeneklaas F R, Van Keulen H, Cissé S, Gosseye P, Van Duivenbooden N (1994) Competing for limited resources: options for land use in the fifth region of Mali. Pages 227–247 in Fresco L O, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, Van Keulen H (Eds.) The future of the land: mobilizing and integrating knowledge for land use options. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte W F (Ed.) (1991) Participatory Action Research. Sage Publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, Pardey P G (1994) Supporting agricultural research policy and priority decisions: an economic-ecological systems approach. Pages 45–66 in Goldsworthy P, Penning de Vries F W T (Eds.) Opportunities, use and transfer of systems research methods in agriculture to developing countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wossink A (1993) Analysis of future agricultural change: a farm economics approach applied to Dutch arable fanning. PhD-dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR (Wetenschappelijke Raad Regeringsbeleid) (1992) Ground for choices: four perspectives for rural areas in the European Community. Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, Sdu Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Janssen, W.G. (1995). Aggregating economic knowledge for use at national, regional, sector, and farm level. In: Bouma, J., Kuyvenhoven, A., Bouman, B.A.M., Luyten, J.C., Zandstra, H.G. (eds) Eco-regional approaches for sustainable land use and food production. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0121-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0121-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4058-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0121-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics