Skip to main content

Cognitive Modelling: Experiences in Human-Computer Interaction

  • Chapter
  • 189 Accesses

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 83))

Abstract

This paper collates the experience of cognitive modelling in human-computer interaction into a view of why and how cognitive models should be constructed. Early promise that cognitive modelling would aid the design of computer interfaces has seen only minimal success. The view taken here is that cognitive modelling should be attempted only if the researcher’s primary objective is to increase understanding of user psychology. Practical applications may follow from an increased understanding, but this is not guaranteed.

If a cognitive model is to be constructed, then the researcher has the option of using one of a number of types of description. Two are illustrated with example models from the human-computer interaction literature. The first is a description of the competence, or knowledge, that a user brings to bear in order to perform a range of tasks. This is illustrated with a model called Task-Action Grammars (TAG; Payne and Green [39]). The second is a description of the learning mechanisms that people use in order to acquire knowledge of how to perform tasks. This is illustrated with a model called Ayn (Howes [16]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.R. (1993) Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnard, P.J. (1990) Bridging between basic theories and the artifacts of human-computer interaction. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.) Designing Interaction — Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnard, P.J., Hammond, N.V., Morton. J., Long, J. and Clark, I. A. (1981) Consistency and compatibility in human-computer dialogue. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 87–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Byrne, M.D., Wood, S.D., Sukaviriya, P., Foley, J.D., Kieras, D.E. (1994) Automating interface evaluation. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’94. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. and Newell, A. (1983) The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carroll, J.M. and Campbell, R.L. (1986) Softening up hard science: reply to Newell and Card. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 3. 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll, J.M. and Kellog, W.A. (1989) Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design. In Bric, K. and Lewis, C. (Eds.) CHI’89 Conference Proceedings: Wings for the Mind. ACM. 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carroll, J.M. and Rosson, M.B. (1987). Paradox of the Active User. In J.M. Carroll (ed) Interfacing Thought. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Churchill, E.F. and Young, R.M. (1991) Modelling representations of device knowledge in Soar. In L.Steels and B.Smith (Eds) AISB-91: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, 247–255. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duff, S.C. (1989) Reduction of action uncertainty in process control systems: The role of device knowledge. In Megaw, E. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics. Taylor and Frances. 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray, W.D, John, B.E. and Atwood, M.E. (1992) The precis of Project-Ernestine or an overview of a validation of GOMS. In P.Bauersfeld, J.Bennet, and G.Lynch (Eds.) Proceedings of CHI92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Addison Wesley. 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Green, T.R.G. (1990) Limited theories as a framework for human-computer interaction. In D. Ackermann and M.J. Tauber (Eds.) Mental Models and Human-Computer Interaction 1. Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Green, T.R.G., Bellamy, R.K.E. and Parker, J.M. (1987) Parsing and gnisrap: a model of device use. In G.M. Olson, S. Sheppard, and E. Soloway (Eds.), Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second Workshop. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holland, J.H. (1986) Escaping brittleness: the possibilities of general-purpose learning algorithms applied to parallel rule-based systems. In R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell and T.M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine Learning, an Artificial Intelligence Approach. Volume II. Los Altos, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Howes, A. (1993) Recognition-based problem solving. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boulder. 551–556.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howes, A. (1994) A Model of the acquisition of menu knowledge through exploration. In Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI94. Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Howes, A. and Payne, S.J. (1990a) Display-based competence: Towards user models for menu-driven interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33 (6), 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howes, A. and Payne, S.J. (1990b) Semantic analysis during exploratory learning. In J.C. Chew and J. Whiteside (Eds.) CHI’90 Conference Proceedings: Human Factors in Computing Systems (Special Issue of the SIGCHI bulletin). Seattle, Washington: ACM Press. 399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howes, A. and Payne, S.J. (1990c) Supporting exploratory learning. In D. Diaper, D. Gilmore, G. Cockton and B. Shackel (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT’90. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. 881–885.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Howes, A. and Young, R.M. (1991) Predicting the learnability of task-action mappings. In S.P. Robertson, G.M. Olson and J.S. Olson(Eds.) Reaching Through Technology — CHI’91 Conference Proceedings:Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, Louisiana.Addison-Wesley. 113–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. John, B.E. (1989) Cumulating the science of HCI: From S-R compatibility to transcription typing. Proceedings of CHI’89 Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kieras, D.E. and Poison, P.G. (1985) An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitajima, M. and Poison, P.G. (1992) A computational model of skilled use of a graphical user interface. In Proceedings of CHI92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lansdale, M.W. (1991) Remembering about documents: memory for appearance, format, and location. Ergonomics, 34 (8), 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Larkin, J.H. (1989) Display-based problem solving. In D. Klahr, and K. Kotovsky, Complex Information Processing; The Impact of Herbert A. Simon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, W.O. (1993) Adapting to interface resources and circumventing interface problems: knowledge development in a menu search task. In J.L. Alty, D.Diaper and S.Guest (eds) People and Computers VIII Proceedings of the HCI’93 Conference. Cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis, C.H. (1988) Why and how to learn why: Analysis-based generalisation of procedures. Cognitive Science, 12, 211–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis, C.H. and Rieman, J. (1993) Task-Centered User Interface Design. Shareware book available via anonymous ftp from ftp.cs.colorado.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Long, J. (1989) Cognitive ergonomics and human-computer interaction. In J.Long and A.Whitefield (Eds.) Cognitive Ergonomics and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mayes, J.T., Draper, S.W., McGregor, M.A. and Oatley, K. (1988) Information flow in a user interface: The effect of experience and context on the recall of MacWrite screens. In D.M. Jones and R. Winder (Eds.) People and Computers IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K. (1960) Plans and the Structure of Behaviour. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Monk, A.F. and Wright, P. (1991) Observations and inventions: new approaches to the study of human-computer interaction. Interacting with Computers, 3, 2. 204–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Newell, A. (1980) The problem space as a fundamental category. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, N.J:Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Newell, A. (1990) Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. .

    Google Scholar 

  35. Newell, A. and Card, S.K. (1985) The prospects of psychological science in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, I (3), 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nygren, E., Lind, M., Johnson, M., and Sandblad, B. (1992) The art of the obvious. In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennet, G. Lynch (Eds.) Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’92. Addison Wesley. 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Payne, S.J. (1990) Looking HCI in the I: A simple notation for describing interactions at the user interface. In D. Diaper, D. Gilmore, G. Cockton and B. Shackel (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction -INTERACT’90. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 881–885.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Payne, S.J. (1991) Display-based action at the user interface. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Payne, S.J. and Green, T.R.G. (1986) Task-action grammars: A model of the mental representation of task languages. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 93–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Payne, S.J. and Green, T.R.G. (1989) The structure of command languages: an experiment on task-action grammar. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 30, 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Poison, P.G. and Lewis, C.H. (1990) Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Poison, P.G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J. and Wharton, C. (1992) Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 741–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Reisner, P. (1981) Formal grammar and design of an interactive system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. SE-5, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rumelhart, D.E. and Norman, D (1982) Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schiele, F and Green, T.R.G. (1990) HCI formalisms and cognitive psychology: The case of task-action grammar. In Harrison and Thimbleby (Eds.), Formal methods in HCI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Teitelbaum, R.C. and Granda, R.E. (1983) The effects of positional constancy on searching menus for information. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’83 (Boston). New York: ACM. 150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Young, R.M. and Simon, T. (1987) Planning in the Context of Human-Computer Interaction. In D.Diaper and R.Winder (Eds.) People and Computers III. Cambridge University Press. 362–370.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Young, R.M. and Whittington (1990) Using a knowledge analysis to predict conceptual errors in text-editor usage. In J.C. Chew and J.Whiteside (Eds.) Empowering People — CHI’90 Conference Proceedings: Human Factors in Computing Systems (Special Issue of the SIGCHI Bulletin). Seattle, Washington: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Young, R.M., Green, T.R.G. and Simon, T. (1989) Programmable user models for predictive evaluation of interface designs. In K.Bice and C.Lewis (Eds.) Proceedings of CHI’89 Human Factors in Computing Systems, . New York: ACM Press. 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  50. Young, R.M., Howes, A. and Whittington, J. (1990) A knowledge analysis of interactivity. In D. Diaper, D. Gilmore, G. Cockton and B. Shackel (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT’90. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. 881–885.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Howes, A. (1995). Cognitive Modelling: Experiences in Human-Computer Interaction. In: Nyerges, T.L., Mark, D.M., Laurini, R., Egenhofer, M.J. (eds) Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0103-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0103-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4049-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0103-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics