Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 83))

Abstract

Human spatial cognition appears to operate differently in manipulable (small scale) spaces and in geographic (large scale) spaces. Although some fundamental spatial concepts may apply for both kinds of spaces, the relative salience of the concepts may be quite different. Geographic information systems (GIS) represent geographic spaces and the entities in them, but users interact with these systems as if they were manipulable, through representations that appear in manipulable spaces. This difference in scales of representation and action is not new, as people have long reasoned about geographic spaces while looking at or remembering graphical maps, which, like GIS displays and equipment, are manipulable entities. Part of the power and utility of maps comes from their natural space-in-space representations, but since geographic and manipulable spaces are different in how people think and reason about them, graphical maps to some extent misrepresent the geographic spaces that they show. Montello captured the essence of this dilemma when he asserted:

Maps represent [geographical] spaces, but are themselves instances of [manipulable] space...[he] therefore expect[s] the psychological study of map use to draw directly on the psychology of [manipulable] space rather than on the psychology of [geographical] space. [14, p. 315]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Downs, R. M. and Stea, D., 1977. Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freundschuh, S. M., 1991. Spatial Knowledge Acquisition of Urban Environments from Maps and Navigation Experience, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geography, State University of New York at Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gaile, G. L. and Willmott, C. J., 1989. Geography in America. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gärling, T. and Golledge, R. G., 1987. Environmental perception and cognition. In E. H. Zube and G. T. Moore (Eds.), Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum, pp. 203–236.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ittelson, W. H., 1973. Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory. In W. H. Ittelson (Ed.), Environment and Cognition. New York: Seminar, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, M., 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lloyd, R., 1989. Cognitive maps: Encoding and decoding information. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 79:1, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch, K., 1960. Image of The City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mandler, J. M., 1983. Representation. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. III (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 420–494.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mark, D. M., 1989. Cognitive image-schemata for geographic information: Relations to user views and GIS interfaces. Proceedings, GIS/LIS’89, Orlando, Florida, v. 2, pp. 551–560.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mark, D. M., 1992. Spatial metaphors for human-computer interaction. Proceedings, Fifth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, v. 1, 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montello, D., 1993. Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space. In A. U. Frank and I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 312–321.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Muehrcke, P. and Muehrcke, J., 1992. Map Use; Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation. Madison, Wisconsin: JP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosch, E., 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York, Academic Press, pp. 111–144.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosch, E., 1978. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (editors) Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pederson, E., 1993. Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In Frank, A. U., and Campari, I (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences No. 716.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pinxten, R., van Dooren, I. and Harvey, F., 1983. Anthropology of Space. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siegel, A. W., 1981. The externalization of cognitive maps by children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In L. S. Liben, A. H. Patterson, and N. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span, New York: Academic Press, pp. 167–194.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Talmy, L., 1983. How language structures space. In H. Pick and L. Acredolo (editors) Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, 2nd Edition Deluxe, 1975. William Collins and World Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zubin, D., 1989. Oral presentation, NCGIA Initiative 2 Specialist Meeting, Santa Barbara, CA. Reported in Mark, D. M., Frank, A. U., Egenhofer, M. J., Freundschuh, S. M., McGranaghan, M. and White, R. M., Languages of Spatial Relations: Initiative Two Specialist Meeting Report. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Report 89-2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mark, D.M., Freundschuh, S.M. (1995). Spatial Concepts and Cognitive Models for Geographic Information Use. In: Nyerges, T.L., Mark, D.M., Laurini, R., Egenhofer, M.J. (eds) Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0103-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0103-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4049-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0103-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics