Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Richard A. Watson
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 250)

Abstract

Computationalialism, functionalism, and instrumentalism-behaviorism all appear to some philosophers to facilitate representation without utilizing resemblance. I show that in all these systems, some sort of isomorphic correlation, covariance, pattern, set of relations, etc. is maintained, an expression of a structure or order that is shared by or is the same in both the representation and the represented. Such resemblance is not sufficient, but it seems to be necessary for representation. Philosophers such as Goodman and Cummins base their denial that resemblance is needed on their restriction of the sense of “resemblance” so that many forms of likeness and similarity, such as that maintained by covariance, are not called resemblances. But that means that there is really only a vocabulary difference between, say, Cummins and me. From my broad-based viewpoint, Cummins in fact elaborates arguments that make my point. It is certainly important to distinguish the various ways in which things can be like one another — by sharing properties, by covarying, by being exemplifications of the same set of abstract relations, and so on. But the genus of all these species is that venerable sameness, which, coupled with difference, produces the variety of things in our world.

Keywords

Modern Philosophy Western Philosophy Abstract Relation Governing Principle Contemporary Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Watson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations