Abstract
Some new ideas or other sorts of innovative developments in science are recognized as more important than others, as highly significant, even “revolutionary.” With regard to such ideas or developments, however, we find at least at first look two very different sorts of situations. On the one hand, some of those acknowledgedly important ideas or developments seem to have had recognizable antecedents: the Copernican idea that the earth goes around the sun had been thought of by Aristarchus; the idea that species evolve had been around for a long time before the “Darwinian revolution.” In such cases, it seems that it was not the idea itself that was “new,” but some sort of impact it had. On the other hand, there are “new” ideas (or more general sorts of developments) which do seem again, at least at first glance to have been wholly unanticipated, without recognizable precedent. Paradigm cases usually cited as having these characteristics come from relativity, quantum mechanics, and their cosmological and field-theoretic offshoots. In this essay, I will examine this distinction: its legitimacy, and its basis and consequences to the extent that it is or is not legitimate. I will refer to important innovative ideas which seemprima facieto be of the first type as cases ofregular newnessand those which similarly seem to be of the second as examples ofradical newness.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allègre, C. (1988)The Behavior of the Earth: Continental Drift and Seafloor MobilityCambridge: Harvard University Press.
Avery, O. T., C. M. MacLeod and M. McCarty (1944), “Studies on the Chemical Transformation of Pneumococcal Types”Journal of Experimental Medicine79, 137–158.
Bethe, H. A. (1939), “Energy Production in Stars”Physical Review55; reprinted in Lang and Gingerich (1979), pp. 320–338.
Bowler, P. J. (1989)Evolution: The History of an IdeaBerkeley: University of California Press.
Browder, F. (1988), “Mathematics and the Sciences”, in D. Pines (ed.)Emerging Syntheses in ScienceNew York: Addison-Wesley, pp. 191–203.
Brown, G. C., C. J. Hawkesworth, and R. C. L. Wilson (eds.) (1992)Understanding the EarthCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, G. C. and A. E. Mussett (1981)The Inaccessible EarthBoston: Allen and Unwin.
Burke, J. G. (1986)Cosmic Debris: Meteorites in HistoryBerkeley: University of California Press.
Carey, S. W. (1988)Theories of the Earth and Universe: A History of Dogma in the Earth SciencesStanford: Stanford University Press.
Carlson, E. A. (1966)The Gene: A Critical HistoryLondon: Saunders.
Cohen, M. and E. Nagel (1934)An Introduction to Logic and Scientific MethodNew York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
Cole, G. H. A. (1978)The Structure of PlanetsLondon: Wykeham.
Condie, K. C. (1989)Plate Tectonics and Crustal EvolutionNew York: Pergamon.
Copernicus, N. (1978)Complete WorksVol. II.On the RevolutionsLondon: Macmillan (edited by Jerzy Dobrzycki, translation and commentary by Edward Rosen).
Coradini, A. and M. Fulchignoni (eds.) (1982)The Comparative Study of the PlanetsDordrecht: Reidel.
Cox, A. (ed.) (1973)Plate Tectonics and Geomagnetic ReversalsSan Francisco: Freeman.
Darwin, C. (1959)The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for LifeLondon: Murray.
Dyson, F. (1964), “Mathematics in the Physical Sciences”Scientific AmericanSeptember 1964, p. 249.
Einstein, A. (1905), “On a Heuristic Point of View about the Creation and Conversion of Light”Annalen der Physik17; translated in ter Haar (1967), pp. 91–107.
Einstein, A., H. A. Lorentz, H. Weyl and H. Minkowski (1923)The Principle of RelativityNew York: Dover.
Fischer, E. P. and C. Lipson (1988)Thinking about Science: Max Delbrück and the Origins of Molecular BiologyNew York: Norton.
Glen, W. (1982)The Road to Jaramillo: Critical Years of the Revolution in Earth ScienceStanford: Stanford University Press.
Greene, M. T. (1982)Geology in the Nineteenth Century: Changing Views of a Changing WorldIthaca: Cornell University Press.
Gribbin, J. (1985)In Search of the Double HelixNew York: McGraw-Hill.
Hallam, A. (1974), ARevolution in the Earth Sciences: From Continental Drift to Plate TectonicsOxford: Clarendon.
Hershey, A. D. and M. Chase (1952), “Independent Functions of Viral Proteins and Nucleic Acid in Growth of Bacteriophage”Journal of General Physiology36, 39–56.
Holmes, A. (1944)Principles of Physical GeologyLondon: Thomas Nelson and Sons.
Jammer, M. (1966)The Conceptual Development of Quantum MechanicsNew York: McGraw-Hill.
Judson, H. F. (1979)The Eighth Day of CreationNew York: Simon and Schuster.
Klein, M. (1964), “Einstein and the Wave-Particle Duality”The Natural PhilosopherVol. III, New York: Blaisdell, pp. 3–49.
Klein, M. (1963), “Einstein’s First Paper on Quanta”The Natural PhilosopherVol. II, New York: Blaisdell, pp. 59–86.
Kuhn, T. S. (1978)Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894–1912Oxford: Clarendon.
Lang, K. R. and O. Gingerich (eds.) (1979), ASource Book in Astronomy and AstrophysicsCambridge: Harvard.
Lavoisier, A. (1965)Elements of ChemistryNew York: Dover.
LeGrand, H. E. (1988)Drifting Continents and Shifting TheoriesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyell, C. (1990)Principles of GeologyChicago: University of Chicago Press (facsimile of the first edition, London: Murray, 1830).
MacLane, S. (1986)Mathematics: Form and FunctionNew York: Springer-Verlag. Meadows, A. J. (1972)Science and Controversy: A Biography of Sir Norman LockyerCambridge: MIT Press.
Miller, A. I. (1976), “On Einstein, Light Quanta, Radiation, and Relativity in 1905”American Journal of Physics44.
Olby, R. (1974)The Path to the Double HelixLondon: Macmillan.
Pauling, L. (1939)The Nature of the Chemical BondNew York: Oxford.
Pimentel, G. C. and R. D. Spratley (1970)Chemical Bonding Clarified Through Quantum MechanicsSan Francisco: Holden-Day.
Popper, K. (1962), “Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Knowledge”, inConjectures and RefutationsNew York: Basic Books, pp. 215–250.
Portugal, F. H. and J. S. Cohen (1979), ACentury of DNACambridge: MIT Press.
Shapere, D. (1985), “Objectivity, Rationality, and Scientific Change”, in P. Kitcher and P. Asquith (eds.), PSA 1984, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
Shapere, D. (1984)Reason and the Search for KnowledgeDordrecht: Reidel.
Shapere, D. (forthcoming 1), “Scientific Change”, to appear in W.H.Newton-Smith (ed.)A Companion to the Philosophy of ScienceOxford: Blackwell. Shapere, D. (forthcoming 2), “The Origin and Nature of Time”.
Steuwer, R. (1975)The Compton Effect: Turning Point in PhysicsNew York: Science History Publications.
Swerdlow, N. M. (1973), “The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’s Planetary Theory. A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary”Proceedings of the American Philosophical SocietyVol. 117.
Swerdlow, N. M. (1976), “Pseudodoxia Copernicana¡”Archives internationales d’histoire des sciencesVol. 26.
Swerdlow, N. M. and O. Neugebauer (1984)Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’s De RevolutionibusNew York: Springer-Verlag, 2 vols.
Taylor, S. R. (1992)Solar System EvolutionCambridge: Cambridge University Press. ter Haar, D. (1967)The Old Quantum TheoryOxford: Pergamon.
von Weizsäcker, C. F. (1938), “Element Transformation Inside Stars”, Physikalische Zeitschrift 38, 633; Part II reprinted in Lang and Gingerich (1979), pp. 309–319.
Watson, J. D. (1980)The Double Helix: Text Commentary Reviews Original Papers(edited by G. Stent), New York: Norton.
Watson, J. D. and F. H. C. Crick (1953a), “Genetical Implications of the Structure of Desoxyribonucleic Acid”Nature171, 964–967.
WatsonJ.D. and F. H. C. Crick (1953b), “Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids. A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid”Nature171, 737–738.
Wegener, A. (1966)The Origin of the Continents and OceansNew York: Dover, 1966 (translation of the fourth [1929] edition).
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1969)Towards an Understanding of the Mechanism of HeredityNew York: St. Martin’s Press.
Wood, R. M. (1985)The Dark Side of the EarthLondon: George Allen and Unwin, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shapere, D. (1995). On the Introduction of New Ideas in Science. In: Leplin, J. (eds) The Creation of Ideas in Physics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 55. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0037-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0037-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4021-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0037-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive