Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 71))

  • 544 Accesses

Abstract

We argue that pursuing the aim of building satisfactory “views of quantum reality”, or “quantum ontologies”, is epistemologically legitimate and not subject to no-go theorems. The question as to what extent existing interpretations may be considered satisfactory from this point of view is dealt with on the basis of criteria elaborated within the post-Kantian philosophical tradition. The aim may also prove worth the effort from a purely scientific point of view, although it may imply such radical changes of the ordinary ways of thinking as to require very long times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accardi, L. (1988). Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: a Quantum Probabilistic Approach, in The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes ,edited by G.Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, J.S. (1987). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics ,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Dov, Yoav (1993). Local realism and crucial experiments, in Frontiers of Fundamental Physics ,Proceedings of the Olympia Conference, September 1993, to be edited by M. Barone and F. Selleri.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J. (1988). Nonlocality and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment as Understood through the Quantum-Potential Approach, in Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox ,edited by F. Selleri, Plenum Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J. (1993). The undivided universe — An ontological interpretation of quantum mechanics ,Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology, Revue Internationale de philosophic ,4, pp. 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cushing, J.T., McMullin, E. (1989). Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. Reflections on Bell’s Theorem ,University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cushing, J.T. (1989). A background essay , in Cushing and McMullin 1989, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Witt, B.S. (1973). Quantum Mechanics and Reality, in The Many-Worlds Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics ,edited by B.S. De Witt and N. Graham, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Everett III, H. (1957). ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics, Reviews of Modem Physics 29, 454–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrero, M., Santos, E. (1985). Phys. Lett. 108A373.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrero, M., Van der Merwe, eds. (1994). Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics ,Proceedings of the Oviedo Conference, September 1993, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garuccio, A. (1994). On the validity of Clauser and Horne factorizability

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A., Weber, T. (1986). Phys. Rev. ,D34470.

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herbert, N. (1985). Quantum Reality ,Rider, London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard, D. (1989). “Holism, separability, and the metaphysical implications of the Bell experiments”, in Cushing and McMullin 1989, pp. 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Husserl, E. (1952). Phanomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution ,Husserliana IV, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jarrett, J.P. (1989). “Bell’s Theorem: A Guide to the Implications”, in Cushing and McMullin 1989, pp. 60–79.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kant, I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft ,B303.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kemp Smith, N. (1962). A Commentary of Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason” ,Humanities Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lakatos, I. (1968). “Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society ,69 pp. 149–86.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lambert, K. (1983). Meinong and the Principle of Independence ,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. London, F., and Bauer, E. (1939). “La théorie de l’observation en mécanique quantique”, No. 775 of Actualités scientifiques et industrielles: Exposés de physique générale ,P. Langevin ed., English translation in Wheeler and Zurek 1983, pp. 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mally, E. (1904). “Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandtheorie des Messens”, in A. Meinong (ed.), Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandtheorie und Psychologie ,Graz, pp. 121–262.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall, T.W., Santos, E., Selleri, F. (1983). Phys. Lett. ,98A (5).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marshall, T.W. (1983). Phys. Lett. ,99A (163); (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 26.Marshall, T.W. (1984) Phys. Lett ,100A (225).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marshall, T.W., Santos, E. (1985). Phys. Lett ,107A (164).

    Google Scholar 

  29. McMullin, E. (1989). “The explanation of distant action: Historical notes”, in Cushing and McMullin 1989, pp. 272–302.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson, E. (1966). Phys. Rev. ,150 (1079).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peat, F.D. (1990). Einstein“s Moon — Bell”s Theorem and the Curious Quest for

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson, E. (1966). Phys. Rev., 150 (1079).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peat, F.D. (1990). Einstein‘s Moon — Bell’s Theorem and the Curious Quest for Quantum Reality, Contemporary Books, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Penrose, R. (1987). “Newton, quantum theory and reality”, in Three hundred years of gravitation ,S.W.Hawking, W.Israel eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind ,Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Reichenbach, H. (1944). Philosophic Foundation of Quantum Mechanics ,Berkeley — Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roncadelli, M. (1991). “Langevin Formulation of Quantum Dynamics”, Europhysics Letters 16 pp. 609–615.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Roncadelli, M. (1992). “Langevin approach to quantum mechanics”, preprint FN/T-92/43.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Roncadelli, M., Defendi, A. (1992). I cammini di Feynman ,Quaderni di Fisica Teorica, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Roncadelli, M. (1993). “Approccio a cammini aleatori alla meccanica quantistica”, this conference.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Santos, E. (1992). “Does quantum mechanics predict violations of the Bell inequalities?”, in Bell’s Theorem and the Foundations of Modern Physics ,edited by A. van der Merwe, F. Selleri and G. Tarozzi, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Selleri, F. (1993). “On the Meaning of Special Relativity. If a Fundamental Frame Exists”, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shimony, A. (1989). “Search for a worldview which can accomodate our knowledge of mycrophysics”, in Cushing and Mc Mullin 1989, pp. 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stapp, H.P. (1989). “Quantum nonlocality and the description of nature”, in Cushing and McMullin 1989, pp. 154–174.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tarozzi, G. (1988). “The Italian Debate on Quantum Paradoxes”, in The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes ,edited by G.Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Teller, P. (1989). “Relativity, Relational Holism, and the Bell inequalities”, in Cushing and McMullin 1989, pp. 208–223.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik ,Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W.H., eds. (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement ,Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wigner, E. (1961). “Remarks on the mind-body question”, in The Scientist Speculates ,I.J. Good, ed., pp. 284–302, Heinemann, London; Basis Books, New York. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek 1983, pp. 168–181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergia, S., Fano, V. (1995). The Search for a Quantum Reality. In: Garola, C., Rossi, A. (eds) The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics — Historical Analysis and Open Questions. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4017-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0029-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics