Skip to main content

On the Different Forms of Quantum Acausality

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 71))

Abstract

Four empirical formulations of the causality principle, due respectively to Laplace, Kant, John S. Mill and Hume, are discussed in relation to the philosophy of quantum mechanics, showing how they are all violated by the basic principles of the Copenhagen interpretation, whereas they are perfectly compatible, with the only exception of Laplacean determinism, with a realistic reinterpretation of the present theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. Jammer, M. (1966), The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics ,Mc Graw Hill, New York, pp.166–180;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forman, P. (1971), Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory (1918–1927)“, in Historical Studies in the Physical Science ,University of Pennsylvania Press, Pittsburgh, vol.III, p.1;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Filippini, G. and Tarozzi, G. (1991–92), “D rifiuto della causalità nella filosofia della fisica prequantistica”, Mem. Accad. Naz. Sc. Lett. Arti di Modena, VII, IX ,p.97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Selleri, F. (1989), La causalità impossible ,Jaca Book, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kant, I. (1781), Kritik der reinen Vernunft; English edition of N. K. Smith, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason ,Macmillan, London, 1929, p.218.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tarozzi, G. (1981), “Réalisme d’Einstein et mécanique quantique: un cas de contradiction.entre une théorie physique et une hypothèse philosophique clairement définie”, Revue de Synthése, 101–102 ,pp. 125–158; (1980), “Realism as A Meaningful Philosophical Hypothesis”, Mem. Acc. Sc.Ist. Bologna, XIII, VII ,p.l; (1988), “Science, Metaphysics, and Meaningful Philosophical Principles”, Epistemologia, XI ,p.97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schlick, M. (1949). Philosophy of Nature ,Philosophical Library, New York, pp. 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tarozzi, G. (1988), Probability and Determinism in Quantum Theory , in E. Agazzi (ed.), Probability in the Sciences ,Kluwer, Dordrecht, p.237.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Enriques, F. (1945). Causalità e determinismo nella filosofia e nella storia della scienza ,Atlantica, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tarozzi, G. (1985), “A Unified Experiment for Testing Both the Interpretation and the Reduction Postulate of the Quantum Mechanical Wave Function”, in Open Questions in Quantum Physics ,ed. by G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kant, I. see 2,p.221.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ibid., p.222. 10 ibid.,p.227.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bohr, N. (1928), “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory”, Nature 121 ,pp. 580–590, reprinted in Quantum Theory and Measurement ,ed. by J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek, University Press, Princeton, 1983, p.89.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tarozzi, G. (1982). “Two Proposals for Testing Physical Properties of Quantum waves”, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 35 ,p.53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mill, J.S. (1872). A System of Logic ,Longmans, London, bk 3, p.186.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ibid.,p.l85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ibid.,p.203. 17 ibid.,p.201.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ibid.,p.213.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hume, D. Treatise ,p.107.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mill, J.S. see 11, p.213.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Selleri, F. (1990). Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality ,Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp.33-–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Tarozzi, G. (1992). “On the Implications of Generalised EPR States for the Completeness and Consistency of Quantum Formalism”, Proceedings of the Conference The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Where Do We Stand? ,New York, April.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Selleri, F. and Tarozzi, G. (1981). “Quantum Mechanics, Reality and Separability”, Rivista Nuovo Cimento ,vol. 4(2), pp.1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Selleri,F. (1990). Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality ,Kluwer, Dordrecht, p.116.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tarozzi, G. (1995). On the Different Forms of Quantum Acausality. In: Garola, C., Rossi, A. (eds) The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics — Historical Analysis and Open Questions. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4017-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0029-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics