Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 71))

  • 542 Accesses

Abstract

Starting from Rothstein’s analysis of the EPR paradox, the logical incompleteness of quantum mechanics and non-separability which implies “the death of atomism” (Primas) are discussed from both physical and logico-epistemological points of view. Indeed, the indeterminacy of the microphysical, simple-elementary entities as fundamental ground of physis involves the breakdown of any kind of reductionism. Reductionism presupposes the possibility of such a determinacy, and so it is nothing else than a particular form of “determinism”. The indeterminate universe of physical processes is non-separable and a physics of the universe as a whole seems to be needed. Furthermore, from a historical and philosophical point of view the principle of separability is shown to be related to the meta-physical project of the technical dominion over nature and the emergence of non-separability in physical theories is analysed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. For these issues, see for example: Giannetto, E. La logica quantistica tra fondamenti della matematica e della fisica , in Foundations of Mathematics & Physics ,ed. by U. Bartocci and J. P. Wesley, Wesley, Blumberg 1990, pp.l07-–127

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giannetto, E. Toward a Quantum Epistemology , in Atti del Convegno S.I.L.F.S. Temi e Prospettive della Logica e della Filosofia della Scienza ,ed. by M.L. Dalla Chiara and M.C. Galavotti, CLUEB, Bologna 1988, pp.121–124

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giannetto, E. (1991), L’epistemologia quantistica come metafora antifondazionistica , in Immagini Linguaggi Concetti ,ed. by S. Petruccioli, Theoria, Roma, pp.301-–322

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giannetto, E. On Truth: A Physical Inquiry , in Atti del Congresso ’Nuovi problemi della logica e della filosofia della scienz; ,I, ed. by C. Cellucci and M. Dalla Chiara, CLUEB, Bologna 1991, pp.221–228

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giannetto, E. Il crollo del concetto di spazio-tempo negli sviluppi della fisica quantistica: l’impossibilità di una ricostruzione razionale nomologica del mondo , in Aspetti epistemologici dello spazio e del tempo ,ed. by G. Boniolo, Borla, Roma 1987, pp. 169–224.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heidegger, M. Die Frage nach der Technik , in Vortr äge und Aufsätze ,Neske, Pfullingen 1954

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heidegger, M. Wissenschaft und Besinnung , in Vorträge und... ,op. cit.; Giannetto, E. Heidegger and the Question of Physics ,Proceedings of the “Conference on Science and Hermeneutics” (Veszprém 1993), ed. by O. Kiss and L. Ropolyi, Reidel, Dordrecht (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giannetto, E. Note sulla complessit à : Max Born e la nascita della nuova fisica del caos , in Atti del congresso S.I.L.F.S. Logica e filosofia della scienza: problemi e prospettive ,ed. by C. Cellucci, M.C. Di Maio and G. Roncaglia, Edizioni ETS, Pisa 1994, pp.317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See notes 1,2, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rothstein, J. Physics of Selective Systems: Computation and Biology ,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 (1982), pp.327–350

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Primas, H. in Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty ,edited by A. I. Miller, Plenum Press, New York, 1990, p.233

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Primas, H. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism ,Springer Verlag, Berlin 1983

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Primas, H. Time-Asymmetric Phenomena in Biology: Complementary Exophysical Descriptions Arising from Deterministic Quantum Endophysics ,preprint 1988, LFC-Zürich; for a general overview

    Google Scholar 

  14. D’Espagnat, B. Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics ,Benjamin, Menlo Park, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bohm D. and Hiley, J.B. The Undivided Universe ,Routledge, London 1993

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Kitchener (ed.), The World View of Contemporary Physics ,State University of New York Press, Albany 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, for example: Giannetto, E. The Epistemological and Physical Importance of G ödel’s Theorems , in First International Symposyum on Gödel’s Theorems ,ed. by Z. W. Wolkowski, World Scientific, Singapore 1993, pp. 136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See references given in the paper quoted in the previous note 6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See papers quoted in note 5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See also the demonstration of the impossibility to attribute a wave function to a single (one-particle) well-defined physical system in quantum mechanics, given in the following paper: Preparata, G. What is Quantum Physics? Back to the QFT of Planck, Einstein and Nernst ,lecture given at the DC Winter School on Hadron Physics, Folgaria (Italy) 6–13 February 1994, MI-TH 94/3 preprint. However, in my opinion, it is not enough to realize a many-particle theory to deal with the non-separability problem.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See for example: Caderni, N. and Martellini, M. (1984), “Third Quantization Formalism for Hamiltonian Cosmologies”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. ,23 p.223.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Giannetto, E. (1992), Teoria quanto-relativistica delle fasi macroscopiche delta materia condensata: la transizione fluido-solido ,ph. d. thesis, University of Messina, Messina

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giannetto, E. and Giaquinta, P.V. (1993), “Towards a Quantum-Relativistic Understanding of the Phases of Matter: The Fluid-Solid Transition”, Physics Essays698–109.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. See note 11 and Kugo, T. and Ojima, I. (1979), Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. ,66 p.1.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Finkelstein, D. The Universal Quantum , in R. Kitchener (ed.), The World View... ,op. cit., pp.75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mach, E. (1883), Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung historisch-kritisch dargestellt ,Brockhaus, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  27. Poincaré, H. (1912), “L’éspace et le temps”, Scientia ,12 pp.159-–171; Giannetto, E. (1994), Henri Poincaré and the rise of special relativity ,lecture delivered in Protvino (Russia), 27 June 1994, at the International Seminar Devoted to the 140th Birthday of Henri Poincar ,in press

    Google Scholar 

  28. Giannetto, E. (1993), Lectures on Relativity ,mimeographed paper, University of Pavia, Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Giannetto, E. (1993), Mach’s Principle and Whitehead’s Relational Formulation of Special Relativity ,conference delivered at the International Congress on ’Mach’s Principle’, Tubingen, July 1993 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Whitehead, A.N. (1919), An Enquiry on the Principles of Natural Knowledge ,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Whitehead, A.N. (1920), The Concept of Nature ,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Whitehead, A.N. (1922), The Principle of Relativity with applications to Physical Science ,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Giannetto, E. (1992), On Relativity Theories and Leibniz ,conference delivered at the International Conference ’Albert Einstein’, Ulm, March 1992 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Giannetto, E. Heidegger and... ,op. cit.; Giannetto, E. Note sulla... ,op. cit.; Davis, M. (1977), “A Relativity Principle in Quantum Mechanics”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. ,16 p.867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leibniz, G.W. Mathematische Schriften ,ed. by C. G. Gerhardt, Halle 1850–63

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cassirer, E. Leibniz System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen ,Elwert, Marburg 1902 and Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1962

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cassirer, E. Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neuren Zeit ,Berlin 1911–1920

    Google Scholar 

  36. Giannetto, E. (1988), Lectures on Leibniz ,mimeographed paper, University of Messina, Messina

    Google Scholar 

  37. Giannetto, E. (1991), Lectures on the History of Energy Concept ,mimeographed paper, University of Messina, Messina.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See references given in note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See references given in note 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giannetto, E. (1995). Some Remarks on Non-Separability. In: Garola, C., Rossi, A. (eds) The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics — Historical Analysis and Open Questions. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4017-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0029-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics