Surpassing The Swedish Model of Road Management Liberalisation?

Finland’s use of patience and selectivity in adopting foreign models
  • Martin De Jong
Part of the The GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 74)


Since the 1980s a wave of institutional and policy reforms, starkly coloured by an Anglo Saxon lens of economic theory, has raged across the globe. Several chapters in this book bear witness to this phenomenon. These chapters include countries one would not immediately regard as culturally affiliated to either Britain or the United States.


Public Choice Nordic Country Public Management Private Party Road Maintenance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arthur Andersen & LSE (2000). Value for money drivers in the Private Finance Initiative. Report commissioned by the Treasury Task Force, 17 January 2000. London, < pfi/series_l/andersen.7tech_contents.html>.Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, P.J., & Michie, J. (1996). Firms, organizations and contracts. Oxford: Oxford Management Series, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Byggandets Kontraktskommitte (BKK, 1996). General conditions of contract for building, civil engineering and installation of works, AB92, revised 1995. Vamamo: AB Faiths Truckeri.Google Scholar
  4. Dagens Industri (2002). Karellbevisen, Asfaltharvan nar fler bolag, pages 6–7.Google Scholar
  5. De Jong, M, & Aijo, J. (2001). Infrastratego; Strategic behaviour shown by actors in a liberalised road design. Construction and maintenance market. Report produced for the Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications. Delft: Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
  6. Derry, T.K. (1979). A history of Scandinavia. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dixit, A.K., & Nalebuff, B.J. (1991). Thinking strategically. The competitive edge in business, politics and every day life. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  8. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Santa Monica, California: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Duke, R.D. (1984). Gaming; The future’s language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice: Economic explanations in political science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Eggertson, T. (1990). Economic behaviour and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fellner, W. (1949). Competition among the few; oligopoly and similar market structures. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  14. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foss, N.J. (Ed.) (1997). Resources, firms and strategies, A reader in the resource-based perspective. Oxford: Oxford Management Readers, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, J. (1983). Oligopoly theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen, M.C. (2000). A theory of the firm; Governance, residual claims and organizational forms. Harvard, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kokko, J.M. (1999). Asfalttialan Markkinat, in: Asfaltt?, Asfaltulutto ryn Julkaisu, Kesakuu 1999, 63, page 6.Google Scholar
  20. Lane, J.-E. (2000), New Public Management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Micheletti, M. (2000). End of big government: is it happening in the Nordic Countries? Governance: An Internationaljournal of Policy and Administration, 13(2), 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of Transport and Communications (2001). Reform of Structures on the Purview of the Ministry of Transport and Communications 1990-2000, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  23. Mueller, D.C. (1989). Public choice II, A revised edition of Public Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. NCC (2002). NCC confirms Cartel Suspicions, Press Release from NCC, 31 January 2002, <http:/>.Google Scholar
  25. Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aidine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  26. Parantainen, J. (1998). Indicators for general objectives of the transport system, Study report, Ministry of Transport and Communications, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  27. Pakkala, P. (2002). Innovative project delivery methods for infrastructure; An international perspective, Helsinki: Finnish Road Enterprise.Google Scholar
  28. Savas, E.S. (1982). Privatizing the public sector; how to shrink government? Chatham (NJ): Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Savas, E.S. (1987). Privatization; The key to better government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  30. Scharpf, F. (1997). Games real actors play; Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shepherd, W.G. (1985). The economics of industrial organization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Teppo, M. (1998). Development of the Finnish Road Administration in the 1990s, unpublished paper, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  33. Teppo, M. (1999). The global change of road organizations, paper presented at the Bicentenary Jubilee Seminar of the Finnish National Road Administration, 10-11 June 1999, Turku, Finland.Google Scholar
  34. Vagverket (2001). Annual Report 2000, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  35. Van Twist, M., & Veeneman, W. (Eds.) (1999). Marktwerking op weg; over concurrentiebevordering in infrastructctuurgebonden sectoren. Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
  36. Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, A study in the economics of internal organization, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law, Third Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin De Jong

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations