Advertisement

Meaning and Measurement in Comparative Studies

  • Stefan Nowak
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 94)

Abstract

The development of comparative social research seems to be one of the most characteristic features of contemporary sociology. The idea of broad, cross-cultural, cross-regional or cross-historical comparisons is, of course, not a new one in the social sciences. In fact it is as old as the tendency to base theoretical generalizations about social phenomena upon broad inductive, empirical evidence. It can be traced in the history of social sciences from Aristotle and Thucydides, through Machiavelli, Ibn Khaldun and Montesquieu, to Marx, Comte, Spencer, Durkheim and Weber. There are nevertheless some special features in contemporary comparative sociology. One is that the studies called ‘comparative’ are usually those which collect and analyze data from more than one society — or perhaps better, from more than one nation-state — trying at the same time to apply the same degree of standardization of research techniques which until one or two decades ago could be found in the studies conducted within one national sample.1

Keywords

Relational Concept Phenomenal Property Initial Indicator Behavioral Sequence Relational Counterpart 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Jacob, Ph., et al., Values and the Active Community, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. Jacobson, E., ‘Methods Used for Producing Comparable Data in the OCSR Seven Nations Attitude Study’, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. I, 1956.Google Scholar
  3. Lazarsfeld P.F., and H. Menzel, ‘On the Relations between Individual and Collective Properties’, in P.F. Lazarsfeld, A. Pasanella, and M. Rosenberg (eds.), Continuities in the Language of Social Research, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Merrit, R.L., and S. Rokkan (eds.), Comparing Nations; The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research, New Haven, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Nowak, S., ‘Correlational Control of Meaning of Attitudinal Variables in Cross-Cultural Survey’, The Polish Sociological Bulletin 5–6, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. Nowak, S., ‘Factors Determining Egalitarian Attitudes of Warsaw Students’, The American Sociological Review, April 1960.Google Scholar
  7. Nowak, S., ‘Social Attitudes of Warsaw Students’, The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 1–2(3–4), 1962.Google Scholar
  8. Nowak, S., ‘The Strategy or Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory’: paper presented at the International Conference on Cross-National Survey Research experienced in Budapest in 1973 by Centre Europeen de Coordination de Recherche et de Documentation en Sciences Sociales in Vienne.Google Scholar
  9. Nowak, S., ‘Concepts and Indicators in Humanistic Sociology’, in this volume, p. 1.Google Scholar
  10. Osgood, Ch. E., G.J. Suci, and F.H. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning, Urbana, Ill., 1957.Google Scholar
  11. Przeworski, A. and H. Teune, ‘Equivalence in Cross-National Research’, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 30 (1966–67).Google Scholar
  12. Przeworski, A., and H. Teune, The Logic of Comparative Social Enquiry, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Verba, S., ‘Cross-National Survey Research, The Problem of Credibility’, in J. Vallier (ed.), Comparative Method in Sociology, Univ. of California Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Nowak

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations