Advertisement

The Logic of Reductive Systematizations of Social and Behavioral Theories

  • Stefan Nowak
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 94)

Abstract

One of the basic tasks of every theoretically oriented discipline is to discover and to test empirically various laws which explain the mechanisms governing the structure and dynamics of the phenomena studied by the given science. Its further task is to systematize these laws as consistently as possible into systems of propositions called theories. Theories may be classified according to various criteria: by the kind of phenomena they describe (substantive systematization), by the formal character of the variables and the relationships they involve (qualitative and quantitative theories), by their interest in either static or dynamic aspects of reality, etc. One possible approach to the classification of theories is to classify them on the basis of relations between the propositions which constitute the given theory. It seems especially worthwhile to distinguish two groups of theories from this point of view:
  1. (I)

    Theories in which some of the laws explain other laws, i.e. in which some laws may be logically derived from the others.

     
  2. (II)

    Theories which are systems of propositions ‘put together’ in a way that does not permit such derivation.

     

Keywords

Contextual Variable Elementary Level Reductive Systematization Sociological Theory Reductive Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Adorno, et al., The Authoritarian Personality, New York, 1950.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlers, H.R., ‘A Typology of Ecological Fallacies’ in: M. Dogan and S. Rokkan (eds.), Quantitative Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. Blalock, H., Causal Inference in Non-Experimental Research, Chapel Hill, 1961.Google Scholar
  4. Brodbeck, M., ‘Methodological Individualism. Definition and Reduction’, in: M. Brodbeck (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, New York, 1968, p. 283.Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, J., A. Etzioni, and J. Porter, Macrosociology, Research and Theory, Boston, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Dollard, J., and M. Miller, Personality and Psychotherapy, New York, 1950.Google Scholar
  7. Edel, A., ‘The Concept of Levels in Social Theory’, in: L. Gross (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theory, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Hochberg, H., ‘Axiomatic Systems, Formalization and Scientific Theories’, in: L. Gross (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theories, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  9. Homans, G., Social Behavior, Its Elementary Forms, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  10. Kümmel, and Opp, Sociology without Sociology Inquiry, vol. 11, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. Landeeker, W.S., ‘Types of Integration and Their Measurement’, in: P.F. Lazarsfeid and M. Rosenberg (eds.), The Language of Social Research, Glencoe, 1955.Google Scholar
  12. Latane, B., and J.M. Darley, ‘Social Determinants of Bystander Intervention in Emergencies’, in: J. Maculay and L. Berkowitz, (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Lazarsfeid P.F., and H. Menzel, ‘On the Relations between the Individual and Collective Properties’, in: P.F. Lazarsfeid, A. PasaneUa and M. Rosenberg (eds.), Continuities in the Language of Social Research.Google Scholar
  14. Malewski, A., O Zastosowaniach teorii zachowania (On the Applications of the Theory of Behavior), Warsaw, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. Malewski, A., ‘Tresc empiryczna teorii materializmu historycznego’ (The Empirical Content of the Theory of Historical Materialism), which was published in My si Filozoficzna, Warsaw, 1958.Google Scholar
  16. Meeh, P., ‘On the Tautology of the Law of Effect’, Psychological Bulletin, 1950.Google Scholar
  17. Menzel, H., ‘Comments on Robinson’s “Ecological Correlation and the Behavior of Individuals”’, American Sociological Review, 15, 1950.Google Scholar
  18. Nagel, E., The Structure of Science, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  19. Nowak, S., ‘Causal Interpretation of Statistical Relationships in Social Research’, in this volume, p. 165.Google Scholar
  20. Nowak, S., ‘Inductive Inconsistencies and the Problems of Probabilistic Predictions’, in this volume, p. 228.Google Scholar
  21. Olds, J., ‘Physiological Mechanism of Reward’, Nebrasca: Symposium on Motivation. 1965.Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, W.S., ‘Ecological Correlation and the Behavior of Individuals’, American Sociological Review 15, 1950.Google Scholar
  23. Schaffner, K., ‘Approaches to Reduction’, Philosophy of Science 34, 1967.Google Scholar
  24. Scheuch, E., ‘Cross-National Comparison Using Aggregate Data: Some Substantive and Methodological Problems’, in: R. Merrit and S. Rokkan, (eds.) Comparing Nations, New Haven, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Sils, D., J. Coleman, et al., Symposium on the “Climate of Opinion Variable”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 1961.Google Scholar
  26. Speier, H., ‘The American Soldier and the Sociology of Military Organizations’, in: R.K. Merton and P.F. Lazarsfeid (eds.), The American Soldier, Continuities in Social Research, Glencoe, 1950.Google Scholar
  27. Spinner, H.F., ‘Science without Reduction, A Criticism of Reductionism with Special Reference to Hummel and Opp’s “Sociology without Sociology”’, Inquiry, 16, 1973.Google Scholar
  28. Thibault, J.W., and H. Kelley, The Social Psychology of Groups, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  29. Zetterberg, H., ‘Axiomatic Theories in Sociology’, in: P.F. Lazarsfeid, and M. Rosenberg (eds.), The Language of Social Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Nowak

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations