Abstract
We have already mentioned, in Section 4 of the last chapter, that von Freytag ascribes the same Struktur to quantitatively undetermined judgments in the plural like ‘Europäer sind Menschen’ as to individual judgments ‘Sokrates ist Mensch’. The former judgment lacks an indication of whether all Europeans are meant, or only some. According to him, individual judgments have, logically speaking, no quantity (1961/65). From this he infers: “Individual judgments like “Socrates is (a) human being” hence have logically the same structure as “Europeans are human beings” or “Sinners are human beings”” (65f., my italics).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barth, E.M. (1974). From the History of the Logic of Indefinite Propositions. In: The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy. Synthese Historical Library, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9866-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9866-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1187-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9866-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive