Abstract
After 40 years of psychosurgery, some agreement on the matter of its efficacy might reasonably be expected. It is clear, however, that no such consensus exists. While several factors have contributed to the continuing controversy surrounding psychosurgery (many of these will be discussed in later chapters), the equivocal nature of psychosurgical data is surely of crucial importance. In the absence of adequately controlled and evaluated studies, contention is inevitable. As The British Medical Journal (1971) observed:
Prefrontal leucotomy is a subject on which opinions are divergent and firmly held. The divergence is not surprising in view of the lack of knowledge. It is an astonishing fact that in the 25-year history of leucotomy, during which more than 100000 patients must have been operated on, no prospective controlled trial has been carried out to compare its effectiveness with non-surgical treatment, (p. 595)
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 M. A. J. O’Callaghan and D. Carroll
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Callaghan, M.A.J., Carroll, D. (1982). Quantitative evaluation of operative procedures. In: Psychosurgery. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9703-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9703-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-9705-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9703-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive