Advertisement

The Influence of Pressure on the Viscosity of Polymer Melts. Viscosity and Molecular Weight

  • R. S. Lenk

Abstract

Polymer melts are compressible liquids of bulk modulus ⋃109Nm−2. Most polymer melt processes operate at pressures of 106 to 107 Nm−2 (10 to 100atm) with a bulk compression of less than 1%. However, in some— notably injection moulding—pressures of the order of 108 N m −2 (1000 atm) may be employed. Bulk compression then is becoming appreciable and the consequent reduction in free volume reduces the mobility of the molecules. This manifests itself as a viscosity increase. Large mouldings may require very high pressures indeed. In such cases allowance should be made for the reduced melt fluidity in the processing specifications.

Keywords

Intrinsic Viscosity Flow Unit Bulk Compression Linear Polyethylene Polymer Rheology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. N. Cogswell, Plastics & Polymers, 39 (Feb. 1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. K. van der Vegt and P. P. A. Smit, ‘Crystallisation phenomena in flowing polymers’, paper read at the Conference on Advances in Polymer Science and Technology, London, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. C. Schmieder, W. C. Carter et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 67, 959 (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. H. Müller, Kolloid-Z., 134 (2/3), 207 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. R. G. Treloar, The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, Oxford University Press (1958).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. G. Fox and S. Loshack, Rheology, R. F. Eirich (editor), 1, p. 431, Academic Press, New York and London (1956).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Bueche, J. Chem. Phys., 20, 1959 (1952) and 25, 599 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Bueche, Physical Properties of Polymers, pp. 67–83, Interscience, London and New York (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. S. Porter and J. F. Johnson, Trans. Soc. Rheol., 6, 107 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. M. Cross, paper presented at the autumn meeting of the British Society of Rheology, Glasgow, 1969, and subsequently published in Polymer.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. J. Flory, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 62, 1057 (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Locati, L. Gargani and A. De Chirico, Rheol. Acta, 13, 278 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Wesslau, Makromol. Chem., 20, 111 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Locati, L. Gargani and A. De Chirico, Polymer Letters, 11 (2), 95 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Applied Science Publishers Ltd 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Lenk
    • 1
  1. 1.Polytechnic of the South BankLondonUK

Personalised recommendations