The Effect of Melt Elasticity on Extrusion and Other Melt Processing Operations

  • R. S. Lenk


It has long been known that grossly irregular extrudate is obtained at excessively high extrusion pressures, especially at low melt temperatures when the viscosity is very high. The gross irregularities suggest that an elastic effect is superimposed on the viscous effect. The stress history of the emerging extrudate must have involved a major flow disturbance— departure from laminar flow, turbulence, ‘melt fracture’—and the die channel was too short to give the melt sufficient dwell time to enable it to relax and recover and to re-establish fully laminar flow. Tordella1 has pointed out that the site of major disturbance must be the die inlet region, where a fat and sluggish flow is converted to a thin and fast flow. Kendall2 studied the effect of the die inlet taper angle on the degree of distortion and found that the elastic stresses in the melt and the severity of the extrudate defects were much reduced when the taper was gentle. It was also possible to estimate the relaxation time of the melt, taking it as the minimum dwell time in the die which is necessary to eliminate the elastic memory and obtain good extrudate.


Polymer Rheology Minimum Dwell Time High Output Rate Draw Resonance Elastic Memory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. P. Tordella, J. Appl. Phys., 27, 404 (1956); SPE Journal, 36 (Feb. 1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. G. Kendall, Trans, & J. Plast. Inst., 31 (99), 49 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. P. Tordella, J. Appl. Poly. Sci., 7, 215 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. J. M. A. Mieras, paper presented at the autumn conference of the British Society of Rheology, Shrivenham (1967).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Clegg in The Rheology of Elastomers, p. 174, Welwyn Garden City Conference, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1958).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. P. Schreiber, A. Rudin and E. B. Bagley, J. Appl. Poly. Scl., 7, 887 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. P. Schreiber and D. C. Storey, Polymer Letters, B3 (9), 723 (Sept. 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. F. Busse, Physics Today, 17, 32 (Sept. 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. N. Cogswell and P. Lamb, Trans. & J. Plast. Inst., 35 (120), 809 (Dec. 1967).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. J. Benbow and P. Lamb, SPE Trans., 3, 7 (1963).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. P. Tordella, J. Appl. Phys., 27, 454 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. L. White and Y. Ide, Rheology and Dynamics of Fiber Formation from Polymer Melts, Univ. Tenn. (Knoxville), May 1975, with 158 references, also Appl. Poly. Symp., 27 (1975).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. D. Han, Rheology in Polymer Melt Processing, Chs. 5, 6 and 8, Academic Press, New York and London (1976).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. S. Lenk, A unified concept of melt flow instability during extrusion, J. Appl. Poly. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. D. Han, Rheology in Polymer Processing, Academic Press, New York and London (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. N. Cogswell and P. Lamb, Trans. & J. Plast. Inst. (Dec. 1967).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Vlachopoulos, Rheol. Acta, 13, 223 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Applied Science Publishers Ltd 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Lenk
    • 1
  1. 1.Polytechnic of the South BankLondonUK

Personalised recommendations