Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structuring the Phenomenological Field: Reflections on a Daubert Manuscript

  • Chapter
Phenomenology in Practice and Theory

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 92))

Abstract

Even among phenomenologists, the name of the Munich philosopher, Johannes Daubert (1877–1947) is practically forgotten today. Up to now, his life and thought were shrouded in deep darkness. But thanks to Herbert Spiegelberg’s efforts to rescue his posthumous papers, it has become possible to publish here for the first time a text written by this highly original and extraordinary personality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Zum anderen Ufer (Remagen: Otto Reichl, 1960), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 7, ed. Manfred S. Frings (Bern and München: Francke, 1973), p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960), I, 218.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eberhard Avé-Lallemant, Die Nachlässe der Münchener Phänomenologen in der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek ( Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1975 ), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This MS is reproduced in Avé-Lallemant, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Die neue Wissenschaft vom Recht. Eine phänomenologische Untersuchung (Berlin: Grünewald: Dr. Walther Rothschild, 1930), p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Urteil und Anschauung. Ein Beitrag zur Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis (Parchim: Hermann Freise, 1914), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Die künstlerische Darstellung als Problem der Ästhetik (Hamburg and Leipzig: Leopold Voss, 1907), p. v.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erinnerungen an Husserl”, in H.L. Van Breda, ed., Edmund Husserl 1859–1959 (La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff, 1959), p. 22. Schapp’s demand is met here for the first time.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This well-confirmed story was already published by Franz G. Schmucker in his 1956 Munich dissertation on Phänomenologie als Methode der Wesenerkenntnis, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zur Wesenlehre des psychischen Lebens und Erlebens (Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968), p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Alexander Pfänders methodische Stellung”, in the Pfänder Festschrift, Neue Münchener philosophische Abhandlungen ( Leipzig: A. Barth, 1933 ), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spiegelberg, I, 174. For a detailed report on this event, see my Husserl über Pfänder ( Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973 ), pp. 128–183.

    Google Scholar 

  14. “Erinnerungen an Franz Brentano”, in Oskar Kraus, ed., Franz Brentano ( München: C.H. Beck, 1919 ), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brentano’s report on his meeting with “the main protagonist” of phenomenology in Munich (as he apostrophizes Daubert) is contained in a letter to Hugo Bergmann of July 30, 1907, published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 7 (1946), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avé-Lallemant, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a first note on this fact, see my article “Ein Brief Husserls an Theodor Lipps”, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 39 (1977), p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Daubert’s own footnote at this point is reproduced below at p. 16, n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Doing Phenomenology. Essays on and in Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Daubert treated Urphänomenologie in a text (MS Daubertiana A I 1/49) which is closely connected with the one published here.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Platos Ideenlehre. Eine Einführung in den Idealismus (Leipzig: Felix Meiner, 1902), pp. 382–384. It should be noted that Daubert’s choice of this work was particularly appropriate, because this book already had been meant by its author to serve a double purpose. On the one hand, it elucidated a purely historical topic, while at the same time it sought to introduce the reader to Natorp’s own idealist philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mikrokosmus. Ideen zur Naturgeschichte und Geschichte der Menschheit, 5th edition (Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1896), I, 179.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Doing Phenomenology, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Edmund Husserl, Ideen I, Husserliana III/1 (Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977 ), p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Tractatus logico-philosophicus, 5.632 and 5.641.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Analysis of Matter (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1927), p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Logische Untersuchungen, Vol. II, 1st Investigation, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Doing Phenomenology, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Karl Schuhmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

William S. Hamrick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schuhmann, K. (1985). Structuring the Phenomenological Field: Reflections on a Daubert Manuscript. In: Hamrick, W.S. (eds) Phenomenology in Practice and Theory. Phaenomenologica, vol 92. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9612-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9612-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3197-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9612-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation