Skip to main content

Dimensions and Components of Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities

  • Chapter
Intelligence and Cognition: Contemporary Frames of Reference

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 38))

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to review advances in the study of individual differences in spatial abilities and to consider some of the practical implications of this work. There are many reasons for the study of spatial cognition in general and spatial ability in particular. First, it is of theoretical and practical significance to understand how individuals represent the physical world in which they operate. Evidence exists for a theoretical separation of spatial representations and semantic representations. Second, there is a substantial literature suggesting the existence of several spatial abilities which are differentiable from general ability and from verbal abilities. Third, there appear to be important sex differences in some spatial abilities. Fourth, measures of spatial ability frequently add unique variance to the prediction of performance in certain courses such as engineering design or graphics and occupations such as mechanic, architect, or pilot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alderton, D.L. & Pellegrino, J.W. (1984). Analysis of mental paper-folding. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Earbara, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderton, D.L., Pellegrino, J.W., & Lydiatt, S. (1984). Effects of extended practice on spatial processing ability. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averbach, E., & Coriell, A.S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, E.S. (1953). An analysis of verbal reports of solving spatial problems as an aid in defining spatial factors. Journal of Psychology, 36, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, O.K., Seashore, H.G & Wesman, A.G. (1974). Manual for the Differential Aptitude Test (5th ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzum, W.A. (1951). A factorial study of reasoning and closure factors. Psyehometrika, 16, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. (1949). The structure of the mind: A review of the results of factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 100–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B. (1976). Psychometric tests as cognitive tasks: A new “structure of intellect”. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 27–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A criticial experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christal, R.E. (1958). Factor analytic study of visual memory. Psychological Monographs, 72 (13, Whole No. 466).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, R., & Lohman, D.F. (1976). Characteristics of a facet-designed measure of memory for pictures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L.A., & Shepard, R.N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W.G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 75–176). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J., & Snow, R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D.E. (1978). Characterizing spatial ability: Different mental processes reflected in accuracy and latency scores. Unpublished manuscript, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., & Harman, H.H. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, J.C., & Smith, I.M. (1983). An international directory of spatial tests. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H.J. (1967). Intellectual assessment: A theoretical and experimental approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 01–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J.W. (1951). The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Psychometric Monographs, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J.W. (1965). The relationship of problem-solving styles to the factor composition of tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J.W., Ekstrom, R.B., & Price, L.A. (1963). Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E.E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 26, 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, E.J., & Cooper, L.A. (1978). Spatial comprehension and comparison processes in verification tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 391–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P., Fruchter, B., & Zimmerman, W.S. (1952). Factor analysis of the Army Air Forces Shepard Field battery of experimental aptitude tests. Psychometrika, 17, 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P., & Hoepfner, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P., & Lacey, J.I. (Eds.) (1947). Printed classification tests. AAF aviation psychology research program reports (No. 5). Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P.F. Lazarfield (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences, 216–257. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K.I., Guilford, J.P., Hoepfner, R., & Doherty, W.J. (1968). A factor analysis of the figural-cognition and figural-evaluation abilities (Rep. No. 40). Psychological Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, K.J., & Harman, H.H. (1938). Comparison of two factorial analyses. Psychometrika, 3, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J.L. (1976). Human abilities: A review of research and theory in the early 1970’s. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 437–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J.L., & Bramble, W.J. (1967). Second-order ability structure revealed in right and wrongs scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 115–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J.L., & Cattell, R.B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L.G. (1962). The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17, 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. & Pellegrino, J.W. (in press). Expanding intelligence testing with interactive computer terminals: A critique and prospectus. Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, H.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Reviev, 92, 137–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (1983). Growth functions for information processing parameters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Diego, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). Image and Hind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M. (1981). The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory. Psychological Review, 88, 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M., Brunn, J.L., Cave, C.R. & Wallach, R.W. (1983). Components of mental imagery representation (Technical Report No. 1). Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koussy, A.A.H. El (1935). The visual perception of space. British Journal of Psychology, 20. (Monograph supplement)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P.C. (1984.). Information processing analysis of spatial ability. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D.F., & Snow, R.E. (1984). Effects of aptitudes, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 130–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P.C., Lohman, D.F., &.Woltz, D.J. (1984). Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansman, M. (1981). Ability factors and the speed of information processing. In M.P. Friedman, J.P. Das and N. O’Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and learning (pp. 441–457). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. & Quasha, W.H. (1970). Manual for the revised Minnesota paper form board test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D.F. (1979a). Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlational literature (Tech. Rep.. Mo. 8). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Aptitude Research Project, School of Education. (NTIS HO. AD-A075 972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D.F. (1979b). Spatial ability: Individual differences in speed and level (Tech. Rep. No. 9). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Aptitude Research Project, School of Education. (NTIS NO. AD-A075 973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D.F. (1977). Eye movement differences reflecting aptitude processes. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Framcisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D.F., & Kyllonen, P.C. (1983). Individual differences in solution strategy on spatial tasks. In R.F. Dillon & R.R. Schmeck (Ms.), Individual Differences in cognition, 1, 105–135. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, C.M. (1953). Analysis of the Relative Movement test by a method of individual interviews (ETS RM 53–08). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshalek, B., Lohman, D.F., & Snow, R.E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, M. (1925). A study of practical ability. British Journal of Psychology, 8. (Monograph supplement)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGree, M.G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neuroligcal influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGree, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities; Sources of sex differences. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1964). Lost: Our intelligence? Why? American Psychologist, 19, 871–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S., & French, J.W. (1975). Dimensions of cognitive closure. Multivariate 3ehavioral Research, 1, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, V.B., Zimmerman, W.S., & Guilford, J.P. (1950). An investigation of two hypotheses regarding the nature of the spatial relations and visualization factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 187–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumaw, R.J. & Pellegrino, W.J. (in press). Individual differences in complex spatial processing. Journal of Educational Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumaw, R.J., Pellegrino, J.W., Kail, R.V. & Carter, P. (in press). Different slopes for different folks: Process analysis of spatial aptitude. Memory and Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J.W. & Glaser, R. (1979). Cognitive correlates and components in the analysis of individual differences. Intelligence, 3, 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J.W. & Mumaw, R.J. (1980). Multicomponent models of spatial ability. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, C. (1952). The closure factors related to other cognitive processes. Psychometrika, 17, 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child’s conception of space. NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poltrock, S.S. & Brown, P. (1984). Individual differences in visual imagery and spatial ability. Intelligence, 8, 93–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regian, J.W. & Pellegrino, J.W. (1984). Practice and transfer effects in two-dimensional mental rotation.. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, T.C (1962). Progressive matrices. London: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, W.F., & Snow, R.S. (1965). Studies in cine-psychometry I: Preliminary factor analysis of visual cognition and memory. Audio Visual Center, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. & Feng, C. (1972). A Chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental Rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I.M. (1964). Spatial ability. San Diego: Knapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E. (1980). Aptitude processes. In R.E. Snow, P.A. Rederico, & W.E. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, 1, Cognitive process analyses of aptitude, 27–64. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E. (1981). Toward a theory of aptitude for learning: Fluid and crystallized abilities and their correlates. In M.P. Friedman, J.P. Das, & N. O’Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and Learning, 345–362. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1939). Thurstone’s work re-worked. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. (1921). Symposium on intelligence and its measurement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. (1938a). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. (1938b). The perceptual factor. Psychometrika, 3, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. (1944). A factorial study of perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. (1951). Analysis of mechanical aptitude (Rep. No. 62). Psychometric Laboratory, University of Chiacago, Chicago, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L., & Thurstone, T.G. (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B.J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P.E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1955). Wechsler adult intelligence scale. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry, R.J. (1959). Hierarchical factor solutions without rotation. Psychometrika, 24, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H.A., Dyk, R.B., Faterson, H.G., Goodenough, D.R., & Karp, S.A. (1962). Psychological differentation. New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S.A. (1971). Embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, W.S. (1953). A revised orthogonal rotation solution for Thurstone’s original primary mental abilities test battery. Psychometrika, 18, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, W.S. (1954). The influence of item complexity upon the factor composition of a spatial visualization test, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lohman, D.F., Pellegrino, J.W., Alderton, D.L., Regian, J.W. (1987). Dimensions and Components of Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities. In: Irvine, S.H., Newstead, S.E. (eds) Intelligence and Cognition: Contemporary Frames of Reference. NATO ASI Series, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9437-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9437-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3523-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9437-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics