Skip to main content

Topical Ethical Questions

  • Chapter
Ethics at Work

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 16))

  • 224 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses specific ethical issues which were raised and discussed by participants during the interviews and are indicative of some of the concerns of employees in participating organisations. The first three sections concern democracy, equal opportunities and discrimination and the role of unions. The final, more extended, section is a case study of how privatisation has affected ethical standards in some public-sector, or formerly public-sector, organisations. Privatisation has been a major moral and ideological issue in the UK and many other countries for over twenty years, and the arguments continue about the desirability of selling publicly owned services and assets to commercial companies. The moral issues raised are fundamental, and will be discussed at some length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Michels (1962) Political Parties (trans. E.Paul and C.Paul), Free Press, New York, pp. 342–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For discussion of the ‘paradox of democracy’ arguments see B. Goodwin (1997) Using Political Ideas, 4th edn., John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 286–288.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This section is based on my chapter, The ethical effects of privatisation, in R. Norman (ed.) (1999) Ethics and the Market, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 95–116. I am grateful to the Society for Applied Philosophy for permission to use the material.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Labour government elected in 1997 has pursued similar policies, by and large.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. H. Tawney (1969) Religion and the Rise of Capitalism Penguin, Harmondsworth, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Friedman (1962) Capitalism and Unfreedom, quoted in E. Sternberg (1994) Just Business, Little, Brown & Co., London, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sternberg op.cit., p. 41. In Anarchy, State and Utopia, 1974, Blackwell, Oxford, Robert Nozick argued that taxation is theft, in that it violates individual rights. The same argument might be applied to using business resources for ethical ends: it violates the rights of shareholders.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.S. Mill, op.cit., p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See J. Gray (1992) The Moral Foundations of Market Institutions, Institute of Economic Affairs, London, especially Plant’s response.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See also A. Buchanan (1985) Ethics, Efficiency and the Market, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Jacobs (1992) Systems of Survival, Hodder & Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. This contention is frequently repeated in his works: see C-H. de Saint-Simon (1966) Oeuvres de Claude-Henri de Saint-Simon, Anthropos, Paris, vols. I–VI, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Times, 13.8.1997, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Handy (1991) ‘What is a company for?’, Royal Society of Arts Journal, March 1991, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Although some might argue that the demand for water is elastic and people will use more if it is cheap, I believe ‘relatively inelastic’ is a reasonable description. I must have a certain minimum amount of water to live, whatever it costs me, but there is also a ‘natural’ maximum which I will use if cost is not a consideration. I am unlikely to use significantly greater amounts if the company reduces the unit cost of water. Demand inelasticity is, evidently, a mixed blessing for the monopoly supplier, as the privatised water companies in Britain have discovered. They have deliberately diversified into other activities, and sell have sold their engineering skills overseas, because there is a limit to the profits to be acquired from supplying ‘captive’ customers, especially as prices are regulated by Ofwat.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Times, 21.4.2000, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodwin, B. (2000). Topical Ethical Questions. In: Ethics at Work. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9331-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9331-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0363-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9331-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics