Skip to main content

Mild-to-moderate hypertension — to treat or not to treat?

  • Chapter
Common Dilemmas in Family Medicine

Abstract

Hypertension is a sphygmomanometric diagnosis of uncertain causes and nature. Within the spectrum of hypertension there are likely to be different at-risk groups with differing prognoses and differing requirements for treatments. In asking who should be treated, how, where and why, three questions can be asked: Should the elderly, the middle-aged and the young be treated in the same ways? What are the most effective regimes of treatment? What are the objectives of treatment?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Fry, J. (1974). Natural history of hypertension: a case of selective non-treatment. Lancet, 2, 431–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Page, I. H. (1979). Two cheers for hypertension. J. Am. Med. _Assoc., 242, 2559 2561

    Google Scholar 

  • Relman, A. S. (1980). Mild hypertension: no more benign neglect. N. Engl. J. Med., 302, 293–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coope, J. (1982). Article in Tutorials in Postgraduate Medicine - General Practice. E. Gambrill, (ed.). ( London: Heinemann )

    Google Scholar 

  • Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program Cooperation Group (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Five year findings of the HDFUP. y. Am. Med. Assoc,242 23, 2562 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (1961). Blood Pressure: Insurance Experi-ence and its Implications. (New York: Metropolitan Life)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, R. (Chairman) Management Committee (1980). The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Lancet, 1, 1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of General Practitioners (1980). Hypertension in Primary Care, Occasional paper.No. 12. (London: Royal College of General Practitioners) Society of Actuaries (1959). Build and Blood Pressure Study, Volume 1. ( Chicago, Ill.: Society of Actuaries )

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeling-Smith, G. (1980). Office of Health Economics Briefing, JVo. 1Z, London, November

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Hart, J. (1980). Hypertension. ( London: Churchill Livingstone )

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannan, L. T., Beevers, D. G. and Jackson, S. H. D. (1981). Detecting hypertensive patients. Br. Med. J., 1, 1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. (1979). Common Diseases. 2nd edn. ( Lancaster: MTP Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. (1974). Natural history of hypertension, a case for selective non-treatment. Lancet, 2, 431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. (1975). Long surviving hypertension - a 15 year follow up. 3. R. Coll. Gen. Practit., 25, 481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. (1981). Self-check: high blood pressure. Update, 22, 1681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aagaard G.N. (1981). Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program: An alternative interpretation. Am. Heart J., 102, 300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hames, O.G. (1974). Natural history of essential hypertension in Evans County, Georgia. Postgrad. Med., 56 (6), 119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeland, A. (1980). Treatment of mild hypertension: a five-year controlled drug trial: the Oslo Study. Am. y. Med., 69, 725

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group (1979). Five-year findings of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program: Reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. y. Am. Med. Assoc., 242 (23), 2562

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, N.M. (1981). Whom to treat: the dilemma of mild hypertension. Am. Heart j., 101, 867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Management Committee. (1980). The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Lancet. 1, 1261

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, K., O’Brien, E. (1980). Management of hypertension in the elderly. N. Engl. y. Med., 302 (25), 1397

    Google Scholar 

  • US Public Health Service Hospitals Cooperative Study Group. (1977). Treatment of mild hypertension. Results of a ten-year intervention trial. Circ. Res., 40 (Suppl I), 98

    Google Scholar 

  • Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. (1980). Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II: Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mmHg. y. Am. Med. Assoc., 213, 1143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barr, D.M., Gambrill, E., Fry, J., Geyman, J.P. (1983). Mild-to-moderate hypertension — to treat or not to treat?. In: Fry, J. (eds) Common Dilemmas in Family Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9192-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9192-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-9194-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9192-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics