Abstract
If a man looks towards and sees a table, what he experiences or directly perceives will not be a table, but (as we should say) a table-shaped patch of color. Yet, nonetheless, the man may be such that he knows that there is a table before him. Some philosophers — Empiricists — have suggested that what happens is this: (1) there is a real table, which the man is in front of; (2) there are real perceptions, distinct from the table, which the man is experiencing; (3) the perceptions are table-perceptions, and not chair-perceptions, or door-perceptions, or window-perceptions; that is to say, the perceptions which the man is experiencing exemplify certain properties, because of the kind of perceptions they are, which many other perceptions, because of the kinds of perceptions they are, do not exemplify; and (4) those properties are such that, if, at a given time, a man is experiencing perceptions which exemplify those properties, then he is justified in believing, at that time, the proposition: ‘There is a table before me’. Many, I feel, would take issue with (4), suggesting that (4) is wrong and that the self-presenting can never — in any real sense — be made to justify belief in the non-self-presenting. But, unless I am mistaken, the doubtful step in the above formulation is not (4), but (3). For I think that when we have examined the question as to what properties they are in fact which are such that if certain perceptions exemplify those properties then it is reasonable to believe the proposition: ‘There is a table before me’, we will discover that we can find no such properties, and hence that the proposed view is unjustified.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In the present paper I use certain technical expressions. By the term ‘the self-presenting’, I mean those states of affairs or experiences which constitute the immediate contents of a person’s mind. (See A. Meinong, Über emotionale Präsentation,Alfred Holder, Vienna, 1917, Sec. 1. See also Roderick M. Chisholm, Theory of Knowledge,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966, pp. 27–29.) Thus, in the present sense of the term, the self-presenting may be seen to include such things as sense impressions, what one seems to see or to hear or to remember, and ordinary mental states like wanting and feeling sorry for. By ‘direct experience’, I mean that experience which is self-presenting in nature. By an ‘appearance’, and, sometimes, a ‘perception’, I mean what Moore and others have called a ‘sense-datum’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steel, T.J. (1975). Knowledge and the Self-Presenting. In: Lehrer, K. (eds) Analysis and Metaphysics. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9098-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9098-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1193-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9098-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive