Abstract
Adhesion between rubber and more rigid materials is of importance for tyres and many other rubber articles. Although there have been notable advances in recent years, the mechanics of adhesion failure is still far from fully understood. Practical systems are often difficult to study in this respect because of complications such as uncertainty about the locus of failure. In the present studies a system in which vulcanized rubber is simply placed in contact with a rigid substrate (glass or coated glass) is being used as a model. This gives essentially interfacial failure. An energetics approach has proved very helpful in the study of various cohesive failure properties of rubber [1], In earlier work with the present adhesion system it was shown, through peel tests at various angles, that an energetics approach could be used to describe the peel behaviour with the results being independent of peel angle provided this was 30° or more. At lower angles the peel energy was found to increase with decrease in angle. This was attributed to energy losses due to elastic instability in the peel front zone arising from extension of the peeled leg and sometimes giving rise to the occurrence of waves of detachment and reattachment [2,3].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A fairly recent review of various aspects of fatigue and fracture of rubber is given in Prog. Rubb. Technol., 1983, 45, 89–143.
Lake, G.J. and Stevenson, A., J. Adhesion, 1981, 12, 13–22.
Lake, G.J. and Stevenson, A., in Adhesion 6, Applied Science, Barking, 1981, pp.41–52.
Counsell, P.J.C., in Aspects of Adhesion 7, Transcripta Books, London, 1973, pp.202–231.
Bates, R., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1976, 20, 2941–2954.
Roberts, A.D. and Othman, A.B., Wear, 1977, 42, 119–133.
Barquins, M., in Microscopic Aspects of Adhesion and Lubrication, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982, pp.369–387.
Lindley, P.B., J. Inst. Rubb. Ind., 1971, 5, 243–248.
Hata, T., Gamo, M. and Doi, Y., Kobunshi Kagaku, 1965, 22, 152–159.
Lake, G.J. and Lindley, P.B., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1965, 9, 1233–1251.
Lake, G.J. and Thomas, A.G., Proc. Roy. Soc, 1967, A300, 108–119.
Treloar, L.R.G., The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 3rd Edition, 1975.
See, for example: Tabor, D. and Winterton, R.H.S., Proc. Roy. Soc, 1969, A312, 435–450.
Furukawa, J., Yamashita, S., Kotari, T. and Kawashima, M., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1969, 13, 2527–2540.
Jacobasch, H.J., in Physiocochemical Aspects of Polymer Surfaces, Volume 2, Plenum Press, New York, 1983, p.641.
See Shanahan, M.E.R., Schreck, P. and Shultz, J: ‘Role of Molecular Dissipation in Elastomer Adhesion’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fuller, K.N.G., Lake, G.J. (1989). Adhesion of Rubber to Rigid Substrates: Memory Effects and the Threshold Energy. In: Allen, K.W. (eds) Adhesion 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9082-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9082-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-9084-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9082-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive