Abstract
Philosophers of logic and language often make a distinction between three types of linguistic items:
-
(i)
singular terms, including names;
-
(ii)
predicates;
-
(iii)
sentences.
There is a corresponding distinction between three types of objects:
-
(i′)
particulars;
-
(ii′)
properties;
-
(iii′)
propositions.
Of course, this is a prima facie ontological division. Some persons have argued, for example, that there are no propositions, that propositions can be eliminated in favor of particulars having certain properties. Others have argued that there are no properties, that properties can be eliminated in favor of specifiable groupings of particulars. In any case, the tripartite division (i′)-(iii′) is a plausible working hypothesis, if not ultimately defensible.
I have received helpful comments on an earlier draft from Daniel Berger, F. Robert Bohl, Jr., Hector-Neri Castañeda, Alex Michalos, John Norman, Paul Teller, Irving Thalberg, and others. Work on this project has been partially supported by an NEH, 1974 Summer Stipend.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Davidson, ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, The Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963), 685–700. Reprinted in Brand; see pp. 68–69, including note 2.
Prichard, H. A., Moral Obligation, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1949, pp. 187–198. Reprinted in Brand (ed.), The Nature of Human Action, pp. 41–49. This view has recently been defended by Hugh McCann, ‘Volition and Basic Action’, The Philosophical Review 83 (1974), 451–73.
Cf. Brand, Myles, ‘Action and Behavior’, in Brand (ed.), The Nature of Human Action, pp. 3–21, esp. pp. 8–13.
See Arthur Danto, Analytical Philosophy of Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973, Chapters 1–5. Cf. my review, forthcoming in Metaphilosophy.
Cf. Annette Baier, ‘The Search for Basic Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1971), 161–170, and her ‘Intention, Practical Knowledge, and Representation’ in this volume. Also see McCann, op. cit.
‘Agency’ in Binkley, Robert, Bronaugh, Richard and Marras, Ausonio (eds.), Agent, Action, and Reason, Basic Blackwell, Oxford, 1971, pp. 3–25, esp. pp. 20ff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brand, M. (1976). Particulars, Events, and Actions. In: Brand, M., Walton, D. (eds) Action Theory. Synthese Library, vol 97. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9074-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9074-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1188-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9074-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive