Skip to main content

Particulars, Events, and Actions

  • Chapter
Action Theory

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 97))

Abstract

Philosophers of logic and language often make a distinction between three types of linguistic items:

  1. (i)

    singular terms, including names;

  2. (ii)

    predicates;

  3. (iii)

    sentences.

There is a corresponding distinction between three types of objects:

  1. (i′)

    particulars;

  2. (ii′)

    properties;

  3. (iii′)

    propositions.

Of course, this is a prima facie ontological division. Some persons have argued, for example, that there are no propositions, that propositions can be eliminated in favor of particulars having certain properties. Others have argued that there are no properties, that properties can be eliminated in favor of specifiable groupings of particulars. In any case, the tripartite division (i′)-(iii′) is a plausible working hypothesis, if not ultimately defensible.

I have received helpful comments on an earlier draft from Daniel Berger, F. Robert Bohl, Jr., Hector-Neri Castañeda, Alex Michalos, John Norman, Paul Teller, Irving Thalberg, and others. Work on this project has been partially supported by an NEH, 1974 Summer Stipend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Davidson, ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, The Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963), 685–700. Reprinted in Brand; see pp. 68–69, including note 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prichard, H. A., Moral Obligation, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1949, pp. 187–198. Reprinted in Brand (ed.), The Nature of Human Action, pp. 41–49. This view has recently been defended by Hugh McCann, ‘Volition and Basic Action’, The Philosophical Review 83 (1974), 451–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Brand, Myles, ‘Action and Behavior’, in Brand (ed.), The Nature of Human Action, pp. 3–21, esp. pp. 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Arthur Danto, Analytical Philosophy of Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973, Chapters 1–5. Cf. my review, forthcoming in Metaphilosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Annette Baier, ‘The Search for Basic Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1971), 161–170, and her ‘Intention, Practical Knowledge, and Representation’ in this volume. Also see McCann, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ‘Agency’ in Binkley, Robert, Bronaugh, Richard and Marras, Ausonio (eds.), Agent, Action, and Reason, Basic Blackwell, Oxford, 1971, pp. 3–25, esp. pp. 20ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brand, M. (1976). Particulars, Events, and Actions. In: Brand, M., Walton, D. (eds) Action Theory. Synthese Library, vol 97. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9074-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9074-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1188-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9074-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics