Abstract
At the 6th annual Maximum Entropy Workshop Carlos Rodrigues presented an amusing problem in decision theory. In this problem the normal application of expected utility theory leads to an unacceptable conclusion. We restate the problem, and the “paradox.” We then give an “almost but not quite exactly unlike” formulation in which the paradox is resolved. We then pursue the new formulation to show how adopting a mixed strategy makes it possible to “certainly” gain while playing the game. We next show that in a suitable limit the “expected gain” goes to zero. Finally, we speculate on the possible application of these ideas to situations with “great uncertainty.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
RODRIGUEZ [ 1986 ], Carlos, “title?” in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop on Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, ed. C. Ray Smith and Gary Erickson. Reidel. Year?
KANTOR [ 1977 ], Frederick W. Information Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons. NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kantor, P.B., Kantor, M.J. (1988). Decision Making with Barely Any Information: The Role of Mixed Strategies. In: Erickson, G.J., Smith, C.R. (eds) Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Science and Engineering. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 31-32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9054-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9054-4_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-9056-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9054-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive