Skip to main content
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

Suggestions for a better achievement of the ideas and potential of algebra as well as a productive use of the algebraic code have been given by many researchers from different perspectives. Observing students’ behaviour has also induced a reflection on the nature of algebraic thinking and of its underlying dynamics. Algebraic thinking is analysed here in a semiotic perspective: the question “What does a sign represent?” is at the center of the problem between the signifier and the signified. We assume a triadic model, in which the relationship between the object and the subject is mediated by a third entity. Only by means of a semiotic act (which has an essentially triadic nature) one can really grasp the meaning of mathematical objects, but it is also by means of a semiotic act that the subject can evolve his personal senses towards a scientific and socially shared knowledge (in the sense of Vigostsky). This approach seems to be adequate for our purposes, since it is able to integrate these different standpoints into a holistic framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arzarello F., L.Bazzini, Chiappini G. P.: 1993, Cognitive processes in algebraic thinking, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. I, pp.l38–145, Tsukuba, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello F., L.Bazzini, Chiappini G.P.: 1994, The process or naming in algebraic thinking, in J.P. da Ponte and J.F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp.40–47, Lisbon, Portugal: PME Program Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello F., L.Bazzini, Chiappini G.P.: 1995. The construction of algebraic knowledge: towards a socio-cultural theory and practice in L.Meira (Ed.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 119–134, Recife, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelo, P.: 1994, About the role of algebraic language in Mathematics and related difficulties, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico, Universita di Torino, 52,(2), 161–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford. L.: 1999. The rethoric of generalization, in O. Zaslavsky, Proceedings of the 23th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, pp.89–96, Haifa, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bazzini, L. (2004). Cognitive Processes in Algebraic Thinking and Implications for Teaching. In: Fujita, H., Hashimoto, Y., Hodgson, B.R., Lee, P.Y., Lerman, S., Sawada, T. (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9046-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9046-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7902-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9046-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics